Skip to main content

Supreme Court seeks Centre’s response on unethical clinical trials in Gujarat

By A Representative 
The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday directed the Union Government to respond to serious allegations regarding unethical and illegal clinical trials conducted in Ahmedabad and other parts of the country. The directive came while hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Swasthya Adhikar Manch (SAM), which exposed the exploitation of vulnerable populations in drug trials.
Senior advocate Sanjay Parikh, representing the petitioners, told the court that approximately 500 patients were subjected to clinical trials in a public hospital managed by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation. These trials, allegedly conducted without mandatory oversight by an Ethics Committee as required under the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019, involved 58 pharmaceutical companies—both national and international—since 2021.
According to the petition, private drug companies allegedly transferred Rs 17 to 20 crore into the personal accounts of doctors involved in the trials. Meanwhile, trial participants were paid meagre sums between Rs 200 to Rs 500 and reportedly received no compensation in cases of death or serious adverse effects (SAEs). Between 2005 and 2020, India recorded 34,390 cases involving clinical trial-related deaths and SAEs, including 6,500 deaths.
Activists from across the country also raised alarms. ND Jayprakash noted that survivors of the Bhopal Gas Tragedy were exploited in similar trials in Bhopal, resulting in multiple deaths and SAEs. In Indore, some doctors allegedly earned over Rs 5 crore while conducting unethical trials, with 81 adverse events reported. In Rajasthan, out of 213 clinical trials, 95 deaths were recorded, including several in Jaipur in 2018.
The Supreme Court instructed the Government to respond specifically to the affidavit filed on April 23, 2025, by Swasthya Adhikar Manch, and address multiple issues raised regarding clinical trial regulation.
Amulya Nidhi of SAM stated that the organization, in collaboration with Jan Swasthya Abhiyan India, Rajasthan Nagrik Manch, Drug Trial Peedit Sangh, and others, would continue its campaign to ensure justice for clinical trial victims.

Comments

TRENDING

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Rani Laxmi Bai, Tatya Tope 'martyred' by East India Company, Scindia's forefathers

Jiyaji Rao Scindia By  A  Representative In an email alert to Counterview, well-known political scientist Shamsul Islam has said that was “shameful for any political party in democratic India to keep children of Sindhias in their flock” given their role during the First War of Indian Independence (1857). In a direct commentary on Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia moving over to BJP, Prof Islam has quote from a British gazetteer to prove his point.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”