Skip to main content

War helps terrorists, not nations: Why India and Pakistan must choose peace over provocation

By Arundhati Dhuru, Saeeda Diep,  Sandeep Pandey 
On 22 April, the attack on tourists in Pahalgam was carried out by the terrorist organisation The Resistance Front. In the early hours of 7 May, Indian security forces launched strikes on nine sites believed to be camps of Lashkar-e-Taiba, Hizbul Mujahideen, and Jaish-e-Mohammad. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh claimed that at least 100 terrorists were killed. These strikes have been followed by counter-offensives and attempted or foiled attacks from both sides. The number of civilians being killed is now adding to the 26 who lost their lives on 22 April. It remains to be seen when this chain reaction will end. By then, many more civilian lives will likely be lost on both sides.
India initially aimed to precisely target only terrorist camps. However, the Pakistani strike on a Gurudwara and a Masjid in Poonch has expanded the scope of the attacks. A fight against terrorism has now turned into a conflict between two countries. The terrorists have achieved their objective.
Hopefully, the war will stop before it reaches a point where one side gets desperate and considers using nuclear weapons.
The goal of eliminating terrorism will remain a distant dream. It is more likely that additional 'jihadists' will be provoked to take up arms in retaliation for the killing of their brethren. The destruction of the Babri Masjid, which resulted in the first major terrorist attack in India—the serial bomb blasts in Mumbai in early 1993—has already shown that acts of destruction lead to reaction.
Dr. Manmohan Singh resisted the temptation to attack Pakistan after the much larger Mumbai attack in 2008. His government pursued the legal route against the accused, leading to some being punished while others await their verdicts. After a hiatus of more than a year, Kuldeep Nayar led the first delegation of Indian civil society to Pakistan, and the peace process adopted by the government subsequently delivered dividends. This process at least ensured that no repeat incident occurred during the remaining six years of Manmohan Singh’s tenure. India-Pakistan relations had shown visible signs of improvement when he stepped down as Prime Minister.
The wisdom of using peace as a tool to resolve the entangled relationship between the two countries has not been lost. However, the incumbent government of India, instead of insisting on a joint inquiry—with the involvement of third parties if necessary—to identify and prosecute the culprits, has chosen a populist, politically expedient approach of unilaterally attacking Pakistan. Without just means, the stated objective is unlikely to be achieved.
At the end of this war, we’ll be left with more bitterness. Communal hatred on both sides has already reached the level of madness. The narrative driven by a frenzied media will destroy whatever possibilities for rapprochement existed. Trust has been completely eroded. And lastly, there will be no guarantee that another terrorist attack won’t take place several years down the line.
A possible solution lies in friendly relations with Pakistan. At some point, someone has to take the first step. A dialogue between the two countries, followed by confidence-building measures, should ultimately lead to both governments working together to eliminate the threat of terrorism. We must remember that Pakistan has paid a heavier price in terrorist incidents. As recently as March, a train from Quetta to Peshawar with 380 passengers was hijacked by the Balochistan Liberation Army, resulting in many casualties during the subsequent shootout. We must begin with the premise that not everyone in Pakistan supports terrorism. Hence, India’s priority should be to strengthen the saner voices in Pakistan, enabling a democratically elected government to take charge, without military or ISI interference. The support extended to Imran Khan’s party during the last elections proves that people desire democratic rule.
Imran Khan will always be remembered for opening the Kartarpur Sahib corridor for Indian pilgrims—an act that was even praised by Narendra Modi at its inauguration. As a confidence-building measure, India could have reciprocated by opening a corridor to the Ajmer Sharif Dargah for Pakistani pilgrims. This single act could have generated immense goodwill for India within Pakistan. Strong people-to-people ties are the only way to diminish whatever support terrorist organisations may still have in Pakistan.
How long will we continue viewing Pakistan as an enemy? It was part of India until 1947. Many Indians have migrated and settled there. Many families remain connected across borders. How can a husband and wife, married across the border, be expected to pledge loyalty to only one country? Shared history, customs, culture, family, and language—India and Pakistan have been artificially divided. India is living proof that Hindus and Muslims can coexist, even after more than a decade of sustained attempts to divide them through various governmental and non-governmental actions. This political division has been imposed on a social unity that persists at the grassroots. Hindus and Muslims cannot be divided the way the Meiteis and Kukis have been in Manipur. If Hindus and Muslims can coexist, why can’t India and Pakistan?
Going forward, there are only two options: either we live as good neighbours, or we perish together by dropping nuclear bombs on each other.
If the former chiefs of RAW and ISI, A.S. Dulat and Asad Durrani, can write a book together, and if Narendra Modi can make a surprise visit to Lahore to attend Nawaz Sharif’s family function and present a shawl to his mother, why shouldn’t common Indians and Pakistanis be allowed to live in an atmosphere of trust, peace, and friendship?
We hope wisdom prevails among the civilian population, good sense guides political ideologies on both sides, and visionary leadership takes steps in the right direction to solve the problem of terrorism once and for all.
---
Arundhati Dhuru is with the National Alliance of People’s Movements in India, Saeeda Diep is with the Centre for Peace and Secular Studies in Lahore, Pakistan, and Sandeep Pandey is General Secretary of the Socialist Party (India). They, along with their children—Maryam, Ayesha, Bakht, Chaitanya, and Anandi—refuse to consider citizens of the other country as their enemies

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”