Skip to main content

Rediscovering 'Ghadar': The forgotten first Hindi novel on the 1857 rebellion

By Prem Singh 
The rebellion of 1857 had spread over a vast area of the Indian subcontinent, but its main focus was the Hindi heartland. The effect of the rebellion on Hindi literature, therefore, is expected to be considerable. The first four novels in Hindi were written by authors residing in Delhi and the surrounding areas. Gauridutt, the author of Devrani Jethani Ki Kahani (1870), was from Meerut. Ishwari Prasad and Kalyan Rai, the authors of Vama Shikshak (1872), were also from Meerut. The author of Bhagyawati (1877), Sradha Ram Phillory, came from Punjab, and the author of Parikshaguru (1882), Lala Sriniwas Das, lived in Delhi. 
But these texts do not indicate any impact of the rebellion which started from Meerut, where a fierce battle took place in Delhi between the rebellious Indians and the British forces. In contrast, the folk literature of this period depicts the rebellion on a large scale. This is despite the fact that novels were being written in considerable numbers in the pre-Premchand era. The detective novel may be exempted, but even in social and historical novels, no substantial impact of the rebellion is to be found.
Surprisingly, several British writers wrote more than 50 novels and fictional accounts based on the 'Mutiny' between 1859 to 1964, as mentioned by Shailendradhari Singh in his book Novels on the Indian Mutiny. Gautam Chakravarty includes and analyses 70 such novels written from 1859 to 1947 in his book The Indian Mutiny and the British Imagination. The first Hindi novel on the rebellion, titled Ghadar (1930), was published by a Delhi-based writer, Rishabh Charan Jain, after a long wait of 73 years. In fact, this is the first full-fledged novel based on the rebellion written in any Indian language. The novel was confiscated immediately by the British government.
This novel is neither easily available now nor does it find any special mention in the history of the Hindi novel. P.J.O. Taylor, in his book on the 'Mutiny' titled What Really Happened During the Mutiny, gives a reference list of novels and books written on the rebellion in Hindi, Urdu, Bangla, Marathi, and other languages. He makes no mention of this first novel in Hindi written on the rebellion. Dr. Ramvilas Sharma, too, has not mentioned this novel while analysing the impact of the rebellion on Hindi literature. Scholars who have worked on modern Hindi prose or political consciousness in fiction have also overlooked this novel. This indicates a trend of ignoring fiction based on the rebellion, both by writers and scholars. As late as 1976, Bhagawandas Mahore, in his Ph.D. thesis 1857 Ke Swadhinata Sangram Ka Hindi Sahitya Par Prabhav, for the first time made a special reference to Ghadar, acknowledging its significance as the first novel written on the rebellion. After Ghadar came Jhansi Ki Rani Lakshmibai (1946) by Vrindavan Lal Verma. This novel can be termed a trend-setter, as it marked the beginning of an intermittent process of writing novels on the rebellion of 1857—one that continues till today.
Ghadar, divided into ten episodes with an epilogue, contains only 88 pages. However, its brevity does not diminish its significance. The plot of the novel is based on the incidents that took place in Bithoor and Kanpur during the rebellion. The novel deals with the period from May 10, 1857—the day of the revolt by the soldiers of Meerut—to July 17, 1857, when Nana Saheb was defeated by the army of Havelock.
The author plays it safe while writing the novel, as there was an obvious fear of the wrath of British rule. Further, it was a challenging task for him to write a novel based on the incidents of Kanpur, which witnessed two 'infamous' incidents—Satichaura Ghat and Bibighar. These are described by British officers and historians as the most barbaric and deceitful acts of massacre by the rebels. However, there are controversial and contradictory versions of the events.
The writer makes a daring attempt by choosing these two incidents as the subject matter of his novel. In the narrative, when the flames of the rebellion engulf Kanpur and Nana assumes leadership of the rebels, the British take shelter in the Entrenchment with their families. After a month-long encampment, they strike a deal with Nana. As per the agreement, Nana agrees to provide a safe passage to the British to leave Kanpur for Allahabad by arranging boats for them. As they are about to board the boats, firing starts, the boats are set ablaze, and most people—including Army Chief Sir Hugh Wheeler—die on the spot.
Historians are not entirely clear about what exactly happened that day and who was responsible for the massacre. If the rebels had planned it, why then did they bring the British on elephants and 'palkis' to the riverbank when they could have killed them outside the Entrenchment? Was it a 'conspiracy' hatched by Nana? Was it an impulsive reaction by the soldiers provoked by British firing on a boatman? Or was it instigated by the mob present at the site in response to General Neil’s atrocities?
The writer mainly focuses on two characters: Nana Saheb and Azimullah Khan. The representation of Nana does not emerge as strong or vibrant. He is shown as pro-British, lacking the will to revolt and unaware of the revolutionaries’ plans. Jain's portrayal of Nana contradicts both the general Indian perception that views him as a prominent hero of 1857 and the British portrayal of him as a cruel villain. The author likely aimed to present an image distinct from the negative or marginal depictions found in British fictional and historical accounts.
This bias—perhaps even abhorrence—against Nana seen in British literature is likely rooted in the massacres at Satichaura Ghat and Bibighar, where not only British men but also women and children were killed. The British believed Nana was responsible. But in the novel, Nana is portrayed as innocent. Jain goes a step further: toward the end of the novel, he describes a distraught Nana suffering emotionally as he considers himself morally responsible for the massacre. The novel concludes with Nana, along with his family, rowing down a river and voluntarily embracing death by sinking into the water—an act of moral repentance.
Twenty-seven years after the publication of Ghadar, came Surendra Nath Sen’s 'objective and factual' history of the rebellion, 1857. Abul Kalam Azad, in his Preface to the book, emphatically felt that the time had come for both Indians and British to view the rebellion objectively and factually to wipe away the feelings of hatred. Whether the author of Ghadar shared this sentiment or not, the novel minimizes the potential for further provocation of hatred between Indians and British. In fact, the writer confesses that he did not want to tarnish his fictional representation by commenting on the religious-racial revenge undertaken by the British in Kanpur after the rebels' defeat. It need not be emphasized that this first novel on the rebellion can also be read from the perspective of other characters and incidents, besides the notable characterization of Nana Saheb.
***
P.S. A detailed analysis of Ghadar can be found in my article ‘1857 in the Hindi Novel: The Character and the Spirit of the Rebellion’ compiled in the book Literary Resistance: India 1857, Ed. G.K. Das, Sushma Arya, Primus Books, Delhi, 2009.
---
The author, associated with the socialist movement, is a former teacher of Delhi University and a former fellow of the Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimla

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”