Skip to main content

PUCL questions legality of Rohingya refugees’ detention and deportation

By A Representative 
The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has raised serious concerns over the Indian government’s deportation of 40 Rohingya refugees, alleging the process was illegal, inhumane, and violated both domestic and international laws. In a statement, the organization claims the refugees, registered with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) India, were detained in Delhi and abandoned in international waters near the Myanmar-Thailand border.
On May 6, 2025, 43 Rohingya refugees from Muslim and Christian communities, including children as young as 15, female minors as young as 16, senior citizens up to 66 years old, and individuals with serious illnesses such as cancer, were detained by Delhi Police under the pretext of collecting biometric data. After being held for over 24 hours at various police stations, they were transferred to the Inderlok Detention Center in Delhi. Subsequently, 40 of them were covertly flown to Port Blair in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands aboard an army aircraft. There, they were allegedly blindfolded, bound, and placed on naval ships. Survivors reported being tortured, beaten, and accused of involvement in a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. Women among the group faced sexual harassment and abusive language. The refugees were then abandoned in conflict-ridden waters near Myanmar’s Tanintharyi region, close to Thailand.
A recent report confirms the 40 refugees are now under the protection of Myanmar’s National Unity Government (NUG) in exile, though their exact whereabouts remain undisclosed. Three others remain detained at the Inderlok Detention Center. Additionally, 14 other refugees from two families, detained at Vikaspuri Police Station on May 6, faced illegal detention. While the women were released on May 7, the men were held, relocated on May 8, and reportedly beaten in custody. Some have been released following orders from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dwarka.
PUCL argues the deportation violated India’s obligations under international law, including the UN Convention Against Torture, the 1948 Genocide Convention, and the principle of *non-refoulement*, which prohibits returning individuals to places where they face persecution. The Rohingya, recognized as one of the world’s most persecuted minorities, have faced decades of violence and discrimination in Myanmar, with over a million living as stateless refugees in Bangladesh and others seeking refuge in India, Malaysia, and Thailand. In India, approximately 22,500 Rohingya hold UNHCR Asylum Seeker Certificates, as reported by Refugees International in December 2024.
The organization also claims the actions contravened domestic laws, including constitutional protections under Articles 14 (equality) and 21 (right to life and liberty), as well as the Foreigners Act, which outlines deportation procedures. PUCL criticized the government for ignoring these legal safeguards and noted that the Supreme Court, during a May 8, 2025, hearing on a petition to stop the deportations, declined to intervene, while the government argued that the right to residence under Article 19(1)(e) applies only to citizens. PUCL called this argument misleading, asserting that the Rohingya, as refugees fleeing genocidal violence, are entitled to Article 21 protections available to all persons in India.
PUCL has urged the government to investigate the alleged human rights violations, ensure future deportations adhere to due process, and disclose the whereabouts of detainees for their release to their families. The organization emphasized that India’s actions contradict its historical tradition of offering refuge to persecuted groups, such as the Parsis, and urged adherence to legal and humanitarian standards in the treatment of refugees.

Comments

TRENDING

US-China truce temporary, larger trade war between two economies to continue

By Prabir Purkayastha   The Trump-Xi meeting in Busan, South Korea on 30 October 2025 may have brought about a temporary relief in the US-China trade war. But unless we see the fine print of the agreement, it is difficult to assess whether this is a temporary truce or the beginning of a real rapprochement between the two nations. The jury is still out on that one and we will wait for a better understanding of what has really been achieved in Busan.

When growth shrinks people: Capitalism and the biological decline of the U.S. population

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Critically acclaimed Hungarian-American economic historian and distinguished scholar of economic anthropometric history, Prof. John Komlos (Professor Emeritus, University of Munich), who pioneered the study of the history of human height and weight, has published an article titled “The Decline in the Physical Stature of the U.S. Population Parallels the Diminution in the Rate of Increase in Life Expectancy” on October 31, 2025, in the forthcoming issue of Social Science & Medicine (SSM) – Population Health, Volume 32, December 2025. The findings of the article present a damning critique of the barbaric nature of capitalism and its detrimental impact on human health, highlighting that the average height of Americans began to decline during the era of free-market capitalism. The study draws on an analysis of 17 surveys from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (...

Justice for Zubeen Garg: Fans persist as investigations continue in India and Singapore

By Nava Thakuria*  Even a month after the death of Assam’s cultural icon Zubeen Garg in Singapore under mysterious circumstances, thousands of his fans and admirers across eastern India continue their campaign for “ JusticeForZubeenGarg .” A large digital campaign has gained momentum, with over two million social media users from around the world demanding legal action against those allegedly responsible. Although the Assam government has set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT), which has arrested seven people, and a judicial commission headed by Justice Soumitra Saikia of the Gauhati High Court to oversee the probe, public pressure for justice remains strong.

Gujarat civil society to move Supreme Court against controversial electoral roll revision

By Rajiv Shah    A recent, well-attended meeting of Gujarat civil society activists in Ahmedabad , held to discuss the impact of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, has decided to file a petition in the Supreme Court against the controversial exercise initiated by the Election Commission of India (ECI) across the country. Announcing this, senior High Court advocate Anand Yagnik , who heads the Gujarat chapter of the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), said that a committee has already been formed to examine the pros and cons of SIR. “While the SIR exercise began in Gujarat on November 4 and is scheduled to continue for a month, we will file a supporting petition in the case against SIR in the Gujarat High Court or the Supreme Court after observing how it proceeds in the state,” he said. Yagnik’s announcement followed senior advocate Shahrukh Alam —who is arguing the SIR case in the Supreme Court—urging Gujarat’s civil society to also file ...

Mergers and privatisation: The Finance Minister’s misguided banking agenda

By Thomas Franco   The Finance Minister has once again revived talk of merging two or three large public sector banks to make them globally competitive. Reports also suggest that the government is considering appointing Managing Directors in public sector banks from the private sector. Both moves would strike at the heart of India’s public banking system . Privatisation undermines the constitutional vision of social and economic justice, and such steps could lead to irreversible damage.

Why PESA, a Birsa Munda legacy, remains India’s unfulfilled commitment to its tribal peoples

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  Nearly three decades ago, the Indian Parliament enacted a landmark law for tribal regions — the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, better known as PESA. This legislation sought to restore the traditional autonomy of tribal societies and empower them to use local resources according to their customs and needs. However, such decentralization never sat well with today’s developmental politicians, capitalists, and bureaucrats. The question therefore arises — what makes PESA so important?

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Trump escalates threats of war against Venezuela, as millions in US set to lose essential benefits

By Manolo De Los Santos   The United States government is in the grips of one of its longest-running funding gaps in history. The ongoing government shutdown has already stretched beyond 30 days and now, the food security of millions of Americans is at risk as the funding to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is drying up and Trump officials have refused to tap into contingency funds . Approximately 42 million individuals per month rely on SNAP benefits and are set to lose them beginning on November 1.

Is vaccine the Voldemort of modern medicine to be left undiscussed, unscrutinised?

By Deepika*    Sridhar Vembu of Zoho stirred up an internet storm by tweeting about the possible link of autism to the growing number of vaccines given to children in India . He had only asked the parents to analyse the connection but doctors, so called public health experts vehemently started opposing Vembu's claims, labeling them "dangerous misinformation" that could erode “vaccine trust”!