Skip to main content

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

By Ram Puniyani 
​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 
Yet, in the midst of these talks, the "I-A" (Israel-America) axis launched a campaign that has inflicted severe damage. The human cost has been staggering: the reported killing of Khamenei and his family members, the bombing of a school resulting in the deaths of 165 young girls, and the targeting of numerous civilians. In a move that directly impacted regional maritime security, an Iranian naval ship—present in Indian waters for joint exercises—was reportedly torpedoed by a U.S. submarine. While Iran has retaliated, the cycle of violence only deepens the humanitarian crisis.
​For India, these events serve as a sobering eye-opener regarding the evolution of its foreign policy. Historically, India championed Non-Alignment, maintaining amicable and culturally rich relations with Iran. However, the recent shift is palpable. Prime Minister Modi’s visit to Israel on the eve of this conflict, where he pledged solidarity "through thick and thin," stands in stark contrast to India’s traditional neutrality. 
The Prime Minister’s subsequent silence on the demise of Iran’s leadership, coupled with a "blank statement" that equated the aggressor with the aggrieved, signals a departure from India's role as a moral arbiter in the Global South. This transition—from a neutral partner to a silent collaborator with the American-Israeli axis—is a watershed moment in Indian diplomacy.
​To understand this current crisis, one must view it through the lens of U.S. foreign policy since the 1950s. For decades, Washington has interfered in the sovereign affairs of nations under various ideological banners. In the 1960s, the "containment of Communism" led to a horrific war in Vietnam. The U.S. deployed chemical weapons like Napalm and Agent Orange, devastating the ecology and the population alike. Despite spending millions and deploying over 500,000 troops, the U.S. was eventually forced into a morale-crushing retreat by a young nation’s resolve. 
Iran itself has long been a target; in 1951, the democratically elected Mohammad Mosaddegh moved to nationalize Iran's oil, challenging British hegemony. In response, the UK and U.S. orchestrated a coup to install the Shah, a move that prioritized oil interests over Iranian democracy. A similar script was followed in Chile in 1973. When the Marxist leader Salvador Allende nationalized U.S.-controlled copper companies, the CIA backed a coup that installed the ruthless dictator Augusto Pinochet, destroying Chilean democracy for a generation.
​The scars inflicted on West Asia are perhaps the deepest. Following the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, the U.S. funded and trained the Mujahideen—the precursors to the Taliban and Al-Qaeda—to the tune of $8 billion. Following the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. used the "War on Terror" as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and later Iraq. The invasion of Iraq, built on the fabrication of "Weapons of Mass Destruction," was sold to soldiers as a mission of liberation. Instead of bouquets, the region found itself dismantled, giving rise to the horrors of the Islamic State (ISIS). Neither weapons of mass destruction could be located, nor were the soldiers welcomed as liberators.
​Colonialism and imperialism leave indelible marks on the world. Just as the British policy of "divide and rule" fostered the communalism that still haunts India today, the modern "War on Terror" and the coining of the term "Islamic terrorism" have led to the global demonization of Muslims. 
Imperialism continues to prioritize strategic dominance and resource control over human rights and international law. Both these phenomena remain the forces at the roots of the major problems the world faces today. True peace can only be promoted when we recognize these historical patterns and demand a world order based on sovereignty and genuine diplomacy, rather than the "claws" of imperial might.
---
​Ram Puniyani taught at IIT Bombay and is the President of the Center for Study of Society and Secularism

Comments

TRENDING

The farmer's burden: How oil, war, and climate are rewriting the price of food

By Vikas Meshram   The scorching flames of the Middle East conflict are now slowly reaching the kitchens of ordinary people. The true price of this war is paid in daily markets, vegetable shops, and in the shattered minds of farmers. Expensive crude oil, skyrocketing fertilizer prices, and rising agricultural costs are together creating the conditions for global food inflation — and this crisis is directly tied to what people eat and drink every day.

Economic nationalism under strain as Indian corporates turn to America

By Sandeep Pandey*  U.S. federal prosecutors withdrew a criminal case involving allegations that Gautam Adani had bribed officials in India to secure solar energy projects, stating that they lacked sufficient evidence. Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani also settled a civil fraud case with the Securities and Exchange Commission by paying a fine of around ₹180 crore without admitting wrongdoing. In addition, Adani Enterprises reportedly deposited around ₹2,750 crore into the U.S. Treasury to resolve allegations that it had violated U.S. sanctions on Iran through purchases of Iranian liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). 

India’s heatwave crisis: How concrete cities are fueling climate emergency

By Rajkumar Sinha*  According to recent studies, urban areas are witnessing a much sharper rise in temperatures than rural regions. The planet is currently heading toward an additional 1.9°C of warming — far beyond the target envisioned under the Paris Agreement . A team of climate scientists associated with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has noted that India’s average temperature increased by nearly 0.9°C during the decade between 2015 and 2024 compared to the early twentieth century (1901–1930). In western and northeastern India, the hottest day of the year has already become 1.5°C to 2°C warmer since the 1950s.