Skip to main content

Migrants, multiculturalism, and the masking of capitalist crisis

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 
Migrants play a vital role in sustaining essential services across Europe. They work as doctors and nurses, keeping healthcare systems running. They teach in schools, colleges, and universities, helping to develop and share knowledge.
Migrants also work as chefs and cooks in restaurants and hotels, contributing to leisure and hospitality. They operate trains, buses, and taxis, maintaining transport networks. Others serve as scientists, engineers, construction workers, cleaners, and agricultural labourers, producing the food we eat.
Many serve as soldiers or shine on football fields and cricket pitches. From basketball to badminton courts, they entertain and inspire sports lovers around the world. Migrants bring national and international recognition while contributing a wide range of skills that sustain the European economy.
Their diverse cultural backgrounds enrich democratic diversity and deepen multicultural society in Britain and Europe. Yet, they are often unfairly blamed for persistent social and economic issues.
Anti-migrant propaganda has become widespread across much of Western Europe. It undermines migrants' contributions and fuels dangerous stereotypes. Political narratives target multiculturalism and migrants to construct a false national identity in Britain and a fabricated European identity across the continent.
In reality, the historical foundations that link Britain with other Western European countries include feudalism, colonialism, racism, capitalism, and imperialism—often romanticised as a collective legacy of a so-called golden past.
Recently, British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer warned that the UK risks becoming an "island of strangers" due to migration, calling for stricter visa rules. Many were surprised by the conservative tone of his speech during a Downing Street press conference ahead of the immigration white paper.
His remarks echoed Enoch Powell’s infamous 1968 "Rivers of Blood" speech, which portrayed multiculturalism as a threat. Similarly, former Prime Minister David Cameron used the 47th Munich Security Conference to claim that "state multiculturalism" had failed, linking migrants and Muslims to radicalisation and terrorism.
Such anti-migrant sentiment is deeply embedded across the political spectrum in both Britain and Europe.
Sir Keir Starmer’s speech is not an anomaly. It panders to white supremacist sentiments, both domestically and in a racialised European context. Political leaders frequently scapegoat migrants and secular multiculturalism to distract from their own failures.
This strategy deflects attention from leadership shortcomings, shields capitalism from criticism, and obscures its inherent crises. These conditions enable far-right and reactionary politics to thrive.
Contrary to popular narratives, it is not migration or multiculturalism that destroys livelihoods or incomes. Capitalism—despite state support—has failed to create sufficient jobs and secure income for most people across Europe.
The relentless targeting of migrants serves only to distract from this truth: capitalism has failed to deliver prosperity. Instead, it has created an illiberal social, political, economic, and cultural order that promotes authoritarianism while claiming to defend liberal European values.
Migration is not simply a matter of individual choice. It is shaped by the legacies of colonialism, war, conflict, and neocolonial resource extraction. These systemic forces push people to seek safety, stability, and the means to survive.
Yet, in a capitalist society marked by alienation and individualism, many migrants are denied meaningful paths to assimilation. As a result, they turn to their cultural identities as coping mechanisms.
This cultural reliance is then misrepresented to construct stereotypes that further marginalise migrants and devalue their contributions to modern Britain and Europe. This creates fertile ground for blaming multiculturalism and obscuring capitalism's failures.
European capitalism reduces migrants to mere economic units—data points in spreadsheets and surveillance systems. This dehumanising approach erodes the dignity that binds people together.
The disdain for migrants is not accidental. It is a product of capitalism’s utilitarian culture of exclusion. The fight against anti-migrant politics is, fundamentally, a fight against capitalism itself.
As reactionary forces fuel global anti-migrant sentiment, it is more urgent than ever to build solidarity among workers. Workers have no national refuge—only one another.
This solidarity is key to building unity and advancing the ideals of workers’ internationalism.

Comments

TRENDING

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The selective memory of a violent city: Uttam Nagar and the invisible victims of Delhi

By Sunil Kumar*  Hundreds of murders take place in Delhi every year, yet only a few incidents become topics of nationwide discussion. The question is: why does this happen? Today, the incident in Uttam Nagar has become the centre of national debate. A 26-year-old man, Tarun Kumar, was killed following a dispute that reportedly began after a balloon hit a small child. In several colonies of Delhi, slogans such as “Jai Shri Ram” and “Vande Mataram” are being raised while demanding the death penalty for Tarun’s killers. As a result, nearly 50,000 residents of Hastsal JJ Colony are now living in what resembles a state of confinement. 

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.