Skip to main content

From grief to hatred: The dangerous shift after Pahalgam

By Ram Puniyani* 
The killing of 26 tourists in Baisaran near Pahalgam stands as one of the worst tragedies in recent times. Baisaran, a scenic spot accessible only by horseback or on foot, became the site of brutal violence. The terrorists targeted victims after confirming their religion. A local Muslim escort who tried to resist was killed, while other Kashmiri porters carried tourists to safety, opening their homes and mosques to them. Kashmir observed a bandh, and processions raised slogans of Hindu-Muslim unity. Across the country, Muslims and other communities held candle marches and offered condolences for the victims.
Prime Minister Modi was scheduled to be in Kashmir at the time but cancelled his trip a few days before the attack. He was in a Gulf country when the tragedy occurred. Cutting his trip short, he returned to India—but instead of going to Kashmir, he attended a rally in Bihar, where he issued a stern warning to terrorists. The underlying message, subtly conveyed in much of the coverage, was that the terrorists were Muslims and the victims Hindus.
While U.S. President Donald Trump declared a ceasefire, Modi offered a different interpretation. Meanwhile, the Godi media seized the moment, spreading hate and broadcasting imaginary victories over Pakistani cities from the comfort of their studios. The media plumbed new depths, abandoning even the pretense of journalistic ethics.
The worst fallout of this tragedy has been the further escalation of hatred against Muslims. Islamophobia in India is reaching terrifying levels. In Latur, a Muslim man was branded Pakistani and Kashmiri and beaten brutally. Humiliated, he later died by suicide. Kashmiri students were thrown out of a hostel in Uttarakhand in the dead of night and forced to camp outside Dehradun Airport. In perhaps the most disgraceful episode, Vijay Shah, a minister in the BJP-led Madhya Pradesh government, called Indian Army spokesperson Colonel Sophia Qureshi the "sister of terrorists." Though he later apologized, the damage was done.
Mithila Raut, who works with the Centre for Study of Society and Secularism in Mumbai, wrote in Dainik Loksatta (Marathi) listing multiple hate incidents reported in newspapers following the Pahalgam attack. In one shocking case, in Shamli’s Toda village (Uttar Pradesh), a man named Sarfaraz was attacked by Govind, who reportedly said, “You killed our 26, we will kill your 26!” In Punjab’s Dera Bassi, Kashmiri students were attacked in a hostel of the Universal Group of Institutes.
In Masoori, a Kashmiri named Shabbir Dhar who sold shawls was assaulted along with his assistant and told not to return, as they were accused of being behind the Pahalgam killings. In Rohtak, Haryana, Muslim residents were threatened and asked to leave their village by May 2.
These reports, sourced from various newspapers, clearly indicate how the atmosphere of hate has intensified. The social climate has been deteriorating steadily. The Hindu right-wing has systematically cultivated animosity against Muslims, initially through distorted narratives of medieval history, with RSS shakhas, the Godi media, and social media working together to paint Muslims as the eternal "other."
The creation of Pakistan gave communal politics further ammunition to push the narrative that Muslims were responsible for the partition—a gross misrepresentation. The reality is that the partition was the result of a combination of British divide-and-rule policies, Muslim communalism, and Hindu communalism. Notably, the two-nation theory was first articulated by Hindutva ideologue Vinayak Damodar Savarkar.
The post-partition narrative blamed Muslims for the country’s division, despite the simultaneous creation of India and Pakistan, with the latter intended for Muslim-majority regions. The Kashmir conflict added fuel to the fire. The exodus of Kashmiri Pandits in 1990 is frequently weaponized against Muslims. However, it occurred under the V.P. Singh government, supported by the BJP, and under pro-BJP governor Jagmohan. Despite this, the communal angle continues to dominate discourse.
Over time, more and more issues have been exploited to target Indian Muslims. Voices of harmony have been drowned out, and every national crisis is used to further polarize society. The RSS-BJP combine leverages these situations to advance their vision of a Hindu Rashtra.
The Pahalgam tragedy also highlights a shift in Indian diplomacy. As per the 1971 Shimla Agreement between Indira Gandhi and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, India-Pakistan issues were to be resolved bilaterally, without third-party intervention. But with Donald Trump taking a more assertive role and Modi avoiding confrontation, the dynamics appear to be changing. International support for India has also been muted.
What is urgently needed is a return to Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s doctrine of Insaniyat, Kashmiriyat, and Jamhooriyat (Humanity, Kashmiri Identity, and Democracy). As Vajpayee once said, “Friends can change, but not neighbors.” The politics of hating Pakistan, amplified by the Hindu right wing and echoed by hate-filled media, only ends up hurting Indian Muslims. It destroys the possibility of peace at home.
We must understand how the Pahalgam incident has deepened communal divisions and resist the war-mongering and hate campaigns if we want peace and progress for our nation. Once, "Pakistani" was the go-to slur for Indian Muslims—now, "Kashmiri" has also become a target of hatred.
---

Comments

TRENDING

When nostalgia becomes a memory we never lived: The 80s AI trend

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan  The retro hair, vintage clothes and analogue grain are not the real attraction. The real fascination is that AI can now manufacture something technology has always struggled to reproduce: the tactile, imperfect feeling of memory.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Dolly Parton: From a mountain cabin to a library for the world

By Suresh Deman  Born in a one-room cabin in the Tennessee mountains, Dolly Parton turned poverty into poetry, heartbreak into song, and her father's inability to read into a programme that has given more than 300 million books to children. Her remarkable journey suggests that a life is measured not only by how far one travels, but by what one sends back *** Dolly Parton was born into poverty, but never into a poverty of imagination. She entered the world on 19 January 1946 in the mountains of East Tennessee, the fourth of twelve children. The Parton family had little money and few of the comforts that much of America would eventually take for granted. Her father, Robert Lee Parton, farmed, built and laboured wherever work could be found. Her mother, Avie Lee, possessed a different kind of wealth. She filled the crowded home with Appalachian songs, stories, faith and the conviction that hardship need not extinguish beauty. Dolly's childhood poverty was not something later inven...