Skip to main content

PharmEasy: The only online medical store which revises prices upwards after confirming the order

By Rajiv Shah 
For senior citizens — especially those without a family support system — ordering medicines online can be a great relief. Shruti and I have been doing this for the last couple of years, and with considerable success. We upload a prescription, receive a verification call from a doctor, and within two or three days, the medicines are delivered to our doorstep.
Given the stiff competition among online pharmacies, many of them offer rebates. Some even suggest switching to generic alternatives after we place the order. We sometimes agree, but we always make it clear that we won’t change brands for important medicines without consulting our doctor.
However, with competition has come unethical price manipulation.
In our experience, PharmEasy stands out as the worst offender. They initially attract you with a 27% discount. But after finalizing the cart, it drops to 24%. Even then, we’ve placed orders (we prefer cash on delivery). But after getting a confirmation, and just before dispatching the shipment, they increase the price of the medicines.
This happened to us in late April. We had ordered medicines worth over ₹5,000. While enjoying dosa at our favourite Chennai Express restaurant in Ahmedabad, I received an SMS informing me that the prices had been revised upward. Shocked, I canceled the order and left this review on the PharmEasy app:
> “After I ordered medicines at a certain price, PharmEasy hours later updated and revised the prices upward. Unethical — decided to cancel the order.”
They responded, asking us to email the order number. To our surprise, not only was the order canceled, but PharmEasy also removed the entire order history from our account! Still, on May 1, we emailed them with our phone number to find out if it had been an error.
Since then, we’ve received two responses. One, from Sandhya Nackwal on May 2, explained the revised pricing:
> “The products listed in the app are not linked to a fixed price. Thus, we share the estimated cost at the time of order placement, which can be either higher or lower than the actual price. We send you an SMS or push notification for the total discounted amount once your medicines are procured...”
The reply urged us to be patient and reorder. It added:
> “Sometimes, the MRP of medicines may vary depending on the stock received by the chemist. This variation is always due to manufacturer price changes. However, if the price on the packaging differs from the bill, please share an image highlighting the batch number so we can resolve the issue.”
Later, we received a phone call assuring us that this wouldn’t happen again and urging us to reorder. So we did, on May 3. I also sent another email on May 6:
> “Yours is the only platform that updates the price upwards after the order is placed and billed. Very strange, to say the least. We had to cancel the order twice, and now your representative tells us it won’t happen again, so he revived the cancelled order at the original price. Let’s see what happens now!”
But again, the prices were revised upward. After canceling the second order, we got another phone call with the same assurance. So we placed a third order — tempted by the best rebate.
This time, the total payable amount had gone down. Suspicious, I checked and realized they had simply reduced the quantity of medicines we had ordered while raising the prices of the rest. We canceled again and left this updated review:
> “Am forced to edit my review. Twice, after I ordered medicines, PharmEasy revised prices upward before delivery. Third time, they reduced the total amount but also reduced the number of medicines, while increasing some prices. Unethical, untrustworthy. Have canceled for the third time...”
It’s now been two weeks, and we keep getting calls from PharmEasy representatives. We hang up the moment we realize it’s them.
Out of curiosity, I browsed the app’s review section. To my dismay — but not surprise — many others have faced the same issue.
Prashant Arya (April 23):
> “I recently purchased a pharmaceutical product from this platform, and unfortunately, my experience was disappointing. The listed price was ₹80, but the final bill showed ₹100. Plus, additional platform fees made the overall cost even higher. The advertised price does not reflect the actual cost at checkout. Misleading and frustrating.”
M Mohan (January 18):
> “Prices changed between adding items to the cart and checkout. Discounts were shown initially but vanished later. Customer support was poor and unhelpful.”
Namrata Behera (April 30):
> “Most products are listed at a fair price, but at checkout, the price increases…”
Vedant Mule (May 12):
> “Don’t use this app. There’s a huge difference in the price shown on the product page and the cart…"
Each of these users gave a one-star rating. I don’t know whether PharmEasy is losing customers. Maybe not — they claim to have over four crore “satisfied” customers. Perhaps that’s why they don’t care about negative reviews.
But I still wonder: has PharmEasy ever tried to find out why no other app makes such bizarre upward price revisions after confirming an order?

Comments

TRENDING

10,000 students deprived of classes as Ahmedabad school remains shut: MCC writes to Gujarat CM

By A Representative   The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) has written to Gujarat Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel, urging him to immediately reopen the Seventh Day Adventist School in Maninagar, Ahmedabad, where classes have been suspended for nearly two weeks. The MCC claims that the suspension, following a violent incident, violates the constitutional right to education of thousands of children.

Gujarat minority rights group seeks suspension of Botad police officials for brutal assault on minor

By A Representative   A human rights group, the Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat,  has written to the Director General of Police (DGP), Gandhinagar, demanding the immediate suspension and criminal action against police personnel of Botad police station for allegedly brutally assaulting a minor boy from the Muslim community.

On Teachers’ Day, remembering Mother Teresa as the teacher of compassion

By Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ   It is Teachers’ Day once again! Significantly, the day also marks the Feast of St. Teresa of Calcutta (still lovingly called Mother Teresa). In 2012, the United Nations, as a fitting tribute to her, declared this day the International Day of Charity. A day pregnant with meaning—one that we must celebrate as meaningfully as possible.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative   A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey  visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification. 

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

'Govts must walk the talk on gender equality, right to health, human rights to deliver SDGs by 2030'

By A Representative  With just 64 months left to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), global health and rights advocates have called upon governments to honour their commitments on gender equality and the human right to health. Speaking ahead of the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), experts warned that rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushes are threatening hard-won progress on SDG-3 (health and wellbeing) and SDG-5 (gender equality).

Is U.S. fast losing its financial and technological edge under Trump’s second tenure?

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra*  The United States, along with its Western European allies, once promoted globalization as a democratic force that would deliver shared prosperity and balanced growth. That promise has unraveled. Globalization, instead of building an even world, has produced one defined by inequality, asymmetry of power, and new vulnerabilities. For decades, Washington successfully turned this system to its advantage. Today, however, under Trump’s second administration, America is attempting to exploit the weaknesses of others without acknowledging how exposed it has become itself.

What mainstream economists won’t tell you about Chinese modernisation

By Shiran Illanperuma  China’s modernisation has been one of the most remarkable processes of the 21st century and one that has sparked endless academic debate. Meng Jie (孟捷), a distinguished professor from the School of Marxism at Fudan University in Shanghai, has spent the better part of his career unpacking this process to better understand what has taken place.