Skip to main content

Complaint filed against Amul for alleged violation of IMS Act in infant formula promotion

By A Representative 
The Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI) has filed a formal complaint against dairy giant Amul, alleging violations of the Infant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles, and Infant Foods (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 (IMS Act). The complaint has been addressed to the Ministry of Women and Child Development, the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), the Food Safety Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), and the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.  
Dr. Arun Gupta, Chief Coordinator of BPNI, has raised concerns regarding Amul’s recent launch of its liquid ready-to-feed infant formula, branded as Amulspray. BPNI argues that this constitutes a direct violation of the IMS Act, which prohibits the promotion of infant milk substitutes. The organization cites Section 2(g) and Section 2(i) of the Act, which define infant milk substitutes and restrict promotional activities. Reports from media outlets such as The Tribune and Agrimoon.com indicate that Amul’s press release emphasized the product’s convenience for working mothers and its nutritional benefits, which BPNI claims amounts to unlawful marketing.  
Further concerns have been raised regarding Amul’s use of a teddy bear graphic on the product packaging. BPNI asserts that this violates Section 6(2) of the IMS Act, which prohibits the use of imagery designed to enhance product saleability. In response, the organization has urged authorities to take action, including directing Amul to cease all promotional activities related to infant milk substitutes, removing the teddy bear graphic from the product label, establishing a monitoring mechanism to ensure compliance with the IMS Act, and issuing advisories to media outlets to vet press releases for legal compliance before publication.  
BPNI, which has been actively monitoring compliance with the IMS Act since its notification by the Government of India in 1994, claims to remain committed to safeguarding infant feeding practices from commercial influence. As the complaint gains attention, stakeholders await the response from government agencies regarding potential regulatory action against Amul.  

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.
1 comment
»

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.  
Post a Comment
»

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.
Post a Comment
»