Skip to main content

Pakistan's toxic cocktail of money, military power, militancy, and religious extremism

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
The feudal foundations, British colonial legacies, American imperialist support aimed at containing China and India, and Chinese geopolitical ambitions continue to form the lifeblood of the Pakistani armed forces. The Pakistan Army not only controls the nation’s resources and dominates democratic politics but also undermines the conditions necessary for peace and prosperity. The people of Pakistan suffer under the unchecked power of the military and its politics of terror, which threaten both regional stability and global peace. The Pakistani army’s nuclear blackmail makes it a lethal force that keeps peace in chains for the sake of its own survival.
The authoritarian legal, political, and military framework in Pakistan aligns closely with the interests of landed elites, industrialists, corporate entities, political dynasties, and capitalist classes. The hegemonic rule of the Pakistani Army secures the dominance of both ruling and non-ruling elites, while consigning the working masses to persistent deprivation and marginalisation. Religion has been instrumentalised by the governing elites to deflect attention from the underlying causes of hunger, homelessness, poverty, and unemployment. The ideals of peace, prosperity, and progress remain hostage to the Pakistani military, which systematically sabotages all popular movements for democratic politics, human rights, and economic justice in the country.
The toxic cocktail of money, military power, militancy, and religious extremism has not only eroded Pakistan’s cultural, linguistic, religious and social diversities but has also undermined the foundations necessary for nurturing scientific and secular education—essential for building a society grounded in reason. The militarisation of public consciousness enables the ruling classes to maintain their grip over national resources, even as deprivation and inequality continue to deepen across the country. This creates fertile ground for reactionary forces to thrive, reinforcing the hegemony of the military, militants, and mullahs, while normalising crisis as a permanent feature of national life. 
The normalisation and naturalisation of crisis serve to domesticate the working masses through the instrumentalisation of religion, enabling the ruling classes to govern without facing democratic dissent. Such a framework provides the foundation for the Pakistani military to govern the country both directly and indirectly, with the support of mullahs and militants who can no longer be considered non-state actors. These forces live as neighbours and exercise control over the working masses, as if they are inseparable from everyday life of the country.
The terror wielded by the Pakistani military has not only served the interests of imperialist forces in the region but has also been turned against the very people it was ostensibly created to protect. Rampant, everyday terrorism in the country not only destroys lives and livelihoods but also undermines the fundamental conditions necessary for progressive social transformation and the advancement of the people. Today, terrorism has become a thriving industry in Pakistan—normalised by the military and naturalised by the mullahs. These conditions erode the dignity of the people, deepening their sense of powerlessness and disenfranchisement.
These internal nightmares—embodied by the presence of hostile 'neighbours' within Pakistan—extend across regions both within and beyond South Asia, making it increasingly difficult for people to engage meaningfully with the Pakistani state and government. The state, controlled by the military, is widely perceived as synonymous with terrorism. Therefore, any movement toward the democratisation of Pakistan’s military, society, state, and government must be rooted in the working people’s struggle against the influence of mullahs and militants.
The working people of Pakistan have a glorious history of leading successful anti-colonial struggles grounded in the ideals of socialism and secularism. This legacy can serve as a guiding force for contemporary working-class movements against the military, mullahs, and militants, aiming at the emancipation of the people and the deepening of democracy and citizenship rights in the country. These forces—along with their colonial, imperialist, and feudal patrons—can only be defeated through sustained working-class struggle. It is for this reason that, after independence, the Communist Party was banned and socialist voices were marginalised in public life, as reactionary forces led by the military and the mullahs consolidated power. These reactionaries understood that radical, socialist, and secular working-class movements posed a direct threat to the interests of Pakistan’s feudal elite.
In this context, it is time for the working people of Pakistan to reclaim their proud legacy and rise in struggle—not only for their present survival, but for a future grounded in prosperity, peace, and justice. The struggle for Pakistan is, at its core, a battle against all forms of feudalism, colonialism, imperialism, and terrorism at work within the country. The true interests of the working masses can be safeguarded only through working class struggle.

Comments

TRENDING

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative   The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs. 

A balancing act? Global power rivalry over Iran challenges India’s foreign policy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A stable Iran is clearly in India’s interest. While US President Donald Trump has so far avoided a direct attack, the situation remains deeply uncertain. The central problem is that few governments take Trump’s words at face value. His actions have revealed a clear pattern: Washington targets adversaries even while pretending to negotiate with them.