Ceasefire or spectacle? Unpacking the India-Pakistan peace narrative

By Vishwas Bhamburkar*

Ceasefire = Peace?

When India and Pakistan announced their ceasefire, my phone lit up—as expected. The headlines screamed “peace,” but the undercurrents hummed a different tune—grittier, more calculated, and far from altruistic.

Let’s not kid ourselves—this wasn’t two nuclear neighbours stepping back from the brink of all-out war. It had the makings of a choreographed spectacle, with scripts drafted in Washington, Rawalpindi, New Delhi… and Palo Alto. I’m no analyst, have no PhD in South Asian politics, and I don’t binge conspiracy podcasts.

This is just me, observing and reporting.

Zoom out, and you start to see the fingerprints of the 2024 American election, Silicon Valley’s quiet capital, and a defence-industrial symphony playing just beneath the noise. The media said things were spiralling—Pahalgam’s terror attack, killing 26 civilians, sparked India’s strikes on Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba camps. Pakistan’s response, calibrated and furious, bore a Chinese stamp. The internet churned out misinformation by the terabyte, feeding faux war hawks and keyboard generals.

Enter Donald Trump—back in the White House, back with a vengeance, and back to claiming credit. While India retaliated and Pakistan flexed, Trump stayed quiet. Then, just as the stage was set, he swooped in, claiming the “historic peace” he brokered. Never mind that regional fatigue, India’s domestic resolve post-Pahalgam, Pakistan’s crumbling economy, and backchannels—greased by U.S. pressure and a $1 billion IMF loan tied to compliance—did the heavy lifting.

“This conflict’s been going on for centuries,” he quipped days ago, oblivious to the 2025 calendar. I’m sure it played well in Ohio and made a killer ad spot.

But here’s the kicker: this wasn’t just a geopolitical timeout. It’s a techno-political realignment. Behind the scenes, Silicon Valley’s heavyweights—Palantir, Anduril, and Elon Musk’s Starlink—were quietly shaping events. Starlink, already used in conflict zones, reportedly helped stabilise communications in the region. No official confirmation, but the overlap between military needs and tech innovation has never been more blatant. Palantir’s AI-driven surveillance, Anduril’s autonomous drone tech, and Musk’s satellite empire—backed by billions in defence contracts—were likely stress-tested in this South Asian flare-up.

I don’t see how the Trump administration, whose 2024 campaign was flush with tech-lobby cash from these very players, could claim to not have its eyes on this theatre—especially since this was the first major test of the Chinese defence industry, a direct competitor. Please remember, the latter's growth rate has been staggering in the past few years.

The defence sector—energised by the cross-border escalation—now eyes long-term contracts. Indian firms like Bharat Dynamics, which supplies drones and missiles, are cashing in. The Nifty Defence Index didn’t tank—rather, it climbed. Investors aren’t betting on a quick peace. They’re betting on India’s military modernisation. Turkey establishes itself in new markets. Pakistan, meanwhile, gets to splurge $1 billion, with billions to follow—maybe not for peace, but for survival.

The ceasefire was all about timing. It handed Trump a foreign policy “win” to flaunt. It gave the ruling party here a nationalist boost ahead of elections. Pakistan’s military—battered by domestic chaos and empty coffers—needed a breather to save face. China, Pakistan’s ally, likely nudged for de-escalation to protect its regional chessboard. Big Tech got its footprint, defence giants got their margins, and Trump got his messiah moment.

The media’s cashing in, too. Indian outlets, framing Operation Sindoor as a bold strike, turn nationalist fervour into ad dollars. Pakistan’s press distracts from internal collapse. But Kashmir? Cross-border terrorism? Those stay untouched. The Indus Waters Treaty remains in limbo—a reminder that India’s not softening on Pakistan’s “terror machine.”

So yeah, diplomacy gets its photo op. But we’ll have to wait and watch, as we still don’t know if this is peace—or just a pause. War in 2025 isn’t just bullets; it’s a well-timed Truth Social post, a satellite link, and a smug press release.

The real winners? Corporations, governments, and tech titans. The rest of us get a front-row seat to the fine print.

Now that Sindoor is done, it’s time to stay indoors and find some sense of normalcy in the bleakness that remains.

---

*RTI activist. Source: socialist-party-india@googlegroups.com

Comments

How natural and organic farming can be a key to combating the climate crisis

By Raj Kumar Sinha* On July 9, while addressing the “Sahkar Samvad” in Ahmedabad with women and workers associated with cooperatives from Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan, Union Home Minister Amit Shah emphasized that natural farming is essential for both our health and the health of the soil. This is a significant statement in the context of addressing the climate change crisis. Natural farming can play a crucial role in combating climate change. Also known as organic farming, it is a system of agriculture that can increase food production without harming the environment. Natural farming has the potential to reduce carbon emissions by 35% to 50%.

100 yrs of RSS as seen by global media house: Power, controversy, push for Hindu-first India

By Rajiv Shah On a blistering summer evening in Nagpur, nearly a thousand men in brown trousers, white shirts, and black caps stood in formation as a saffron flag was raised, marking a graduation ceremony for Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) workers. This vivid scene, described in a recent FT Weekend Magazine article, “A hundred years after it was founded, India's Hindu-nationalist movement is getting closer to its goal of a Hindu-first state,” captures the enduring presence of the RSS, a century-old Hindu-nationalist organization.

Why is India’s cheetah project under fire? Study flags ecological, social, species injustices

By Rajiv Shah A recent peer-reviewed study has sharply criticized Project Cheetah—India’s high-profile initiative to reintroduce African cheetahs into the wild—as ethically compromised, scientifically flawed, and socially unjust. Titled “Delineating the Environmental Justice Implications of an Experimental Cheetah Introduction Project in India”, the paper is authored by Yashendu C. Joshi, Stephanie E. Klarmann, and Louise C. de Waal, and was published in Frontiers in Conservation Science.

Another 'honor' killing in Tamil Nadu: Caste pride has murdered love, again

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* Once again, Tamil Nadu has witnessed a brutal so-called 'honor' killing. This time, it is Kevin Selvaganesh, a 27-year-old software engineer from the Scheduled Caste community, who has been hacked to death by the family of the girl he loved since childhood. Kevin, a brilliant student employed at Tata Consultancy Services, was in a relationship with Subashini, his schoolmate and girlfriend. The couple, both well-educated and professionally qualified, had plans to marry. Yet, that love story ended in bloodshed — sacrificed at the altar of caste pride.

The myth of population decline: India’s real challenge is density, not fertility

By N.S. Venkataraman* India’s population in 2025 stands at approximately 1.4 billion. In 1950, it was 359 million, rising sharply to 1.05 billion by 2000. The population continues to grow and is projected to reach around 1.7 billion by 2050.

Siang dam project sparks debate over security, development, and displacement in Arunachal

By Aarna Gupta* The proposed Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP) in Arunachal Pradesh, India, has emerged as a contentious initiative shaped by strategic, environmental, and social concerns. Indian officials, including Union Minister Kiren Rijiju and Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu, have voiced strong support for the project. One of the primary motivations is China’s plan to build a 60,000 MW hydropower dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo River (the upper stretch of the Brahmaputra) in Tibet, which Indian authorities see as a threat to water and national security. In response, the 11,000 MW Siang Dam, with its 9 billion cubic meter reservoir, is viewed as a necessary countermeasure to manage water flow and reduce vulnerability.

Shanghai Textbook reassessed: Between revolutionary rhetoric and economic reality

By Harsh Thakor "Maoist Economics and the Revolutionary Road to Communism: The Shanghai Textbook on Socialist Political Economy" (1975) presents a detailed exposition of the Chinese perspective on socialist political economy under Mao . Developed during the Cultural Revolution, it outlines a theoretical framework for the functioning of a socialist alternative to capitalism. The book was formulated under the direction of Zhang Chunqiao, who played a central role in discussions, content planning, and final reviews of the draft.

Trump’s tariff tactics are a geopolitical bully move that may backfire

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent move to impose high tariffs on Indian goods is yet another example of his aggressive, unilateralist economic policy—an attempt to pressure and punish rather than to negotiate. This is not an isolated action. Trump has shown similar hostility toward other countries aligned with the BRICS bloc—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—reflecting his disdain for multipolar global cooperation and his desire to maintain American economic supremacy at all costs.

Search This Blog