Skip to main content

'Silencing critics': Apex Court view 'brain is more dangerous' revoking Saibaba acquittal

Counterview Desk 

Taking strong exception to the Supreme Court observing that “brain is more dangerous” in order verdict suspending the Bombay High Court’s acquittal order in Prof GN Saibaba and others, a civil rights group has blamed the Apex Court for coming under pressure of what it called “Brahmanical Hindutva fascist” government to overturn its refusal to stay their acquittal order.
In a statement, the group, calling itself Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM), based in New Delhi, said, “The trial court’s argument of ‘they are anti-development’ while convicting Saibaba and others and the argument of the Supreme Court that ‘brain is more dangerous' is reflective of the state-corporate nexus’s approach to silence every conscious mind that speaks against rampant corporate loot of people’s resources done by brute military might.”

Text:

Professor GN Saibaba, journalist Prashant Rahi, student and cultural activist Hem Mishra, Pandu Narote, Mahesh Tirki and Vijay Tirki had been acquitted by the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court on 14th October 2022 on the ground that the sanctions were irregular. They were all convicted by the sessions court in 2017.
Despite getting acquittal from High Court, the Brahmanical Hindutva fascist government, hell-bent on keeping Saibaba and others in jail to kill them like Pandu Narote, like Stan Swamy, approached the Supreme Court to stay the acquittal order.
The Supreme Court refused to stay the acquittal order but later, succumbing under the pressure of BJP-RSS led state, constituted a ‘special bench’ for a special sitting, on the very next day on 15th October, to hear a Special Leave Petition of Brahmanical Hindutva fascist Maharashtra government to overturn the acquittal order of Bombay High Court.
The Supreme Court bench of MR Shah and Bela M Trivedi held that the acquittal was not based on the merits of the case and irregular sanction is not sufficient ground to acquit the accused in such a case of “grave nature”. The SC remarked that the “brain is more dangerous” in such cases and granting acquittal in such case of grave nature is a “threat to national security”.
The reason behind this state repression of GN Saibaba is not unknown and it is well understood that he was incarcerated to suppress the voices against Operation Green Hunt, which was a war waged by the Indian state on its own populace, to facilitate unprecedented corporate loot of resources.
The trial court’s argument of “they are anti-development” while convicting Saibaba and others and the argument of the Supreme Court that “brain is more dangerous” is reflective of the state-corporate nexus’s approach to silence every conscious mind that speaks against rampant corporate loot of people’s resources done by brute military might.
It is pertinent to mention that, due to the struggles spearheaded by GN Saibaba and other pro-people democratic forces and the people, the state had to roll back Operation Green Hunt. But the hunger for corporate exploitation was never doused and the state brought forth its new Genocidal Military Operation Samadhan-Prahar, an intensified and more brutal form of Operation Green-Hunt to facilitate the loot of resources by crushing every people’s resistance against it.
Justices Bela Trivedi, MR Shah
This desperation to loot resources, by any means necessary, is reflective of the imperialist crisis throughout the world and its onslaught on our country and its resources to solve its crisis. This is the reason that the state wants to keep “dangerous minds” like Saibaba to carry on its war without witnesses, without any scrutiny by conscious pro-people minds.
Therefore, to address the question of corporate looting of resources and crushing of people’s resistance against it by using brute military force, there is a need to fight for the release of Saibaba and others; those arrested in the Bhima Koregaon case; gain inspiration from the struggles of those who fought against Operation Green-Hunt, the struggles of GN Saibaba and others, and intensify the struggle against Operation Samadhan-Prahar, which is a genocidal Military Operation to break people’s democratic resistance against corporate loot of resources.
While we condemn this order of Supreme Court to suspend the acquittal, even after years of imprisonment and struggling in prison for basic amenities of healthcare, it is also important to remember the sacrifice of Pandu Narote, murdered by denying medical care. It is important to understand the cause for which they paid the price in liberty, their precious years and, above all, life itself, and sadly, will continue to pay now.
We should also remember the thousands of people’s activists, Adivasis, Dalits, oppressed minorities, and working-class people languishing in jail for demanding their basic democratic rights. This overturning of the acquittal order should only increase our resolve to fight for their release and for the repeal of draconian laws like UAPA which provides such arbitrary power to suppress the people.

Comments

TRENDING

Why Venezuela govt granting amnesty to political prisoners isn't a sign of weakness

By Guillermo Barreto   On 20 May 2017, during a violent protest planned by sectors of the Venezuelan opposition, 21-year-old Orlando Figuera was attacked by a mob that accused him of being a Chavista. After being stabbed, he was doused with gasoline and set on fire in front of everyone present. Young Orlando was admitted to a hospital with multiple wounds and burns covering 80 percent of his body and died 15 days later, on 4 June.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Pace bowlers who transcended pace bowling prowess to heights unscaled

By Harsh Thakor*   This is my selection and ranking of the most complete and versatile fast bowlers of all time. They are not rated on the basis of statistics or sheer speed, but on all-round pace-bowling skill. I have given preference to technical mastery over raw talent, and versatility over raw pace.

When a lake becomes real estate: The mismanagement of Hyderabad’s waterbodies

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  Misunderstood, misinterpreted and misguided governance and management of urban lakes in India —illustrated here through Hyderabad —demands urgent attention from Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), the political establishment, the judiciary, the builder–developer lobby, and most importantly, the citizens of Hyderabad. Fundamental misconceptions about urban lakes have shaped policies and practices that systematically misuse, abuse and ultimately erase them—often in the name of urban development.

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes. 

When grief becomes grace: Kerala's quiet revolution in organ donation

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Kerala is an important model for understanding India's diversity precisely because the religious and cultural plurality it has witnessed over centuries brought together traditions and good practices from across the world. Kerala had India's first communist government, was the first state where a duly elected government was dismissed, and remains the first state to achieve near-total literacy. It is also a land where Christianity and Islam took root before they spread to Europe and other parts of the world. Kerala has deep historic rationalist and secular traditions.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Beyond the conflict: Experts outline roadmap for humane street dog solutions

By A Representative   In a direct response to the rising polarization surrounding India’s street dog population, a high-level coalition of parliamentarians, legal experts, and civil society leaders gathered in the capital to propose a unified national framework for humane animal management. The emergency deliberations were sparked by a recent Suo Moto judgment that has significantly deepened the divide between animal welfare advocates and those calling for the removal of community dogs, a tension that has recently escalated into reported violence against both animals and their caretakers in states like Telangana.

'Paradigm shift needed': Analyst warns draft electricity policy ignores ecological costs

By A Representative   The Ministry of Power’s Draft National Electricity Policy (NEP), 2026 has drawn sharp criticism from power and climate policy analyst Shankar Sharma, who has submitted detailed feedback highlighting what he calls “serious omissions” in the government’s approach to energy transition.