Skip to main content

'Silencing critics': Apex Court view 'brain is more dangerous' revoking Saibaba acquittal

Counterview Desk 

Taking strong exception to the Supreme Court observing that “brain is more dangerous” in order verdict suspending the Bombay High Court’s acquittal order in Prof GN Saibaba and others, a civil rights group has blamed the Apex Court for coming under pressure of what it called “Brahmanical Hindutva fascist” government to overturn its refusal to stay their acquittal order.
In a statement, the group, calling itself Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM), based in New Delhi, said, “The trial court’s argument of ‘they are anti-development’ while convicting Saibaba and others and the argument of the Supreme Court that ‘brain is more dangerous' is reflective of the state-corporate nexus’s approach to silence every conscious mind that speaks against rampant corporate loot of people’s resources done by brute military might.”

Text:

Professor GN Saibaba, journalist Prashant Rahi, student and cultural activist Hem Mishra, Pandu Narote, Mahesh Tirki and Vijay Tirki had been acquitted by the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court on 14th October 2022 on the ground that the sanctions were irregular. They were all convicted by the sessions court in 2017.
Despite getting acquittal from High Court, the Brahmanical Hindutva fascist government, hell-bent on keeping Saibaba and others in jail to kill them like Pandu Narote, like Stan Swamy, approached the Supreme Court to stay the acquittal order.
The Supreme Court refused to stay the acquittal order but later, succumbing under the pressure of BJP-RSS led state, constituted a ‘special bench’ for a special sitting, on the very next day on 15th October, to hear a Special Leave Petition of Brahmanical Hindutva fascist Maharashtra government to overturn the acquittal order of Bombay High Court.
The Supreme Court bench of MR Shah and Bela M Trivedi held that the acquittal was not based on the merits of the case and irregular sanction is not sufficient ground to acquit the accused in such a case of “grave nature”. The SC remarked that the “brain is more dangerous” in such cases and granting acquittal in such case of grave nature is a “threat to national security”.
The reason behind this state repression of GN Saibaba is not unknown and it is well understood that he was incarcerated to suppress the voices against Operation Green Hunt, which was a war waged by the Indian state on its own populace, to facilitate unprecedented corporate loot of resources.
The trial court’s argument of “they are anti-development” while convicting Saibaba and others and the argument of the Supreme Court that “brain is more dangerous” is reflective of the state-corporate nexus’s approach to silence every conscious mind that speaks against rampant corporate loot of people’s resources done by brute military might.
It is pertinent to mention that, due to the struggles spearheaded by GN Saibaba and other pro-people democratic forces and the people, the state had to roll back Operation Green Hunt. But the hunger for corporate exploitation was never doused and the state brought forth its new Genocidal Military Operation Samadhan-Prahar, an intensified and more brutal form of Operation Green-Hunt to facilitate the loot of resources by crushing every people’s resistance against it.
Justices Bela Trivedi, MR Shah
This desperation to loot resources, by any means necessary, is reflective of the imperialist crisis throughout the world and its onslaught on our country and its resources to solve its crisis. This is the reason that the state wants to keep “dangerous minds” like Saibaba to carry on its war without witnesses, without any scrutiny by conscious pro-people minds.
Therefore, to address the question of corporate looting of resources and crushing of people’s resistance against it by using brute military force, there is a need to fight for the release of Saibaba and others; those arrested in the Bhima Koregaon case; gain inspiration from the struggles of those who fought against Operation Green-Hunt, the struggles of GN Saibaba and others, and intensify the struggle against Operation Samadhan-Prahar, which is a genocidal Military Operation to break people’s democratic resistance against corporate loot of resources.
While we condemn this order of Supreme Court to suspend the acquittal, even after years of imprisonment and struggling in prison for basic amenities of healthcare, it is also important to remember the sacrifice of Pandu Narote, murdered by denying medical care. It is important to understand the cause for which they paid the price in liberty, their precious years and, above all, life itself, and sadly, will continue to pay now.
We should also remember the thousands of people’s activists, Adivasis, Dalits, oppressed minorities, and working-class people languishing in jail for demanding their basic democratic rights. This overturning of the acquittal order should only increase our resolve to fight for their release and for the repeal of draconian laws like UAPA which provides such arbitrary power to suppress the people.

Comments

TRENDING

Bill Gates as funder, author, editor, adviser? Data imperialism: manipulating the metrics

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  When Mahatma Gandhi on invitation from Buckingham Palace was invited to have tea with King George V, he was asked, “Mr Gandhi, do you think you are properly dressed to meet the King?” Gandhi retorted, “Do not worry about my clothes. The King has enough clothes on for both of us.”

What's Bill Gates up to? Have 'irregularities' found in funding HPV vaccine trials faded?

By Colin Gonsalves*  After having read the 72nd report of the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on alleged irregularities in the conduct of studies using HPV vaccines by PATH in India, it was startling to see Bill Gates bobbing his head up and down and smiling ingratiatingly on prime time television while the Prime Minister lectured him in Hindi on his plans for the country. 

Displaced from Bangladesh, Buddhist, Hindu groups without citizenship in Arunachal

By Sharma Lohit  Buddhist Chakma and Hindu Hajongs were settled in the 1960s in parts of Changlang and Papum Pare district of Arunachal Pradesh after they had fled Chittagong Hill Tracts of present Bangladesh following an ethnic clash and a dam disaster. Their original population was around 5,000, but at present, it is said to be close to one lakh.

Muted profit margins, moderate increase in costs and sales: IIM-A survey of 1000 cos

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad’s (IIM-A's) latest Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES) has said that the cost perceptions data obtained from India’s business executives suggests that there is “mild increase in cost pressures”.

Anti-Rupala Rajputs 'have no support' of numerically strong Kshatriya communities

By Rajiv Shah  Personally, I have no love lost for Purshottam Rupala, though I have known him ever since I was posted as the Times of India representative in Gandhinagar in 1997, from where I was supposed to do political reporting. In news after he made the statement that 'maharajas' succumbed to foreign rulers, including the British, and even married off their daughters them, there have been large Rajput rallies against him for “insulting” the community.

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Govt putting India's professionals, skilled, unskilled labour 'at mercy of' big business

By Thomas Franco, Dinesh Abrol*  As it is impossible to refute the report of the International Labour Organisation, Chief Economic Advisor Anantha Nageswaran recently said that the government cannot solve all social, economic problems like unemployment and social security. He blamed the youth for not acquiring enough skills to get employment. Then can’t the people ask, ‘Why do we have a government? Is it not the government’s responsibility to provide adequate employment to its citizens?’

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Youth as game changers in Lok Sabha polls? Young voter registration 'is so very low'

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  Young voters will be the game changers in 2024. Do they realise this? Does it matter to them? If it does, what they should/must vote for? India’s population of nearly 1.3 billion has about one-fifth 19.1% as youth. With 66% of its population (808 million) below the age of 35, India has the world's largest youth population. Among them, less than 40% of those who turned 18 or 19 have registered themselves for 2024 election. According to the Election Commission of India (ECI), just above 1.8 crore new voters (18-and 19-year-olds) are on the electoral rolls/registration out of the total projected 4.9 crore new voters in this age group.

IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).