Skip to main content

Apex Court Saibaba order supports move to 'kill' brains that think, question, resist

Counterview Desk 

The civil rights network Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), taking strong exception to the Supreme Court order to suspend the acquittal of Prof GN Saibaba and others in Gadchiroli case pertaining to alleged ‘Maoist link’, has said that it an attempt to kill so-called “dangerous brain” because the state wants to kill them and their brains that think, question and resist.
In a statement,CASR says, “They want to kill every brain, gag every mouth and jail every being who questions the brutal exploitation of people by the big corporates. They want to keep in jail every voice that foisted the state’s attempt to militarily loot the people of their resources and livelihood through Operation Green-Hunt, which Saibaba and others jailed in Gadchiroli case and Bhima Koregaon case have strongly rresisted”
It adds, "They want to do so to continue the exploitation of people and their resources in far off central Indian regions, in North Eastern states, Kashmir and everywhere. This is not just an attack on Saibaba and others but a clear sign of continuing and ever sharpening attack on all involved in the struggle for a democratic society.”

Text:

“Our system is scared of those (people) who raise their voice against its injustice. It (system) is scared of the people’s voice. Students and activists, who expose failures of governments, are viewed as a threat by the establishment and the state wants to destroy this threat.” -- Hem Mishra student and cultural activist
Ninety percent disabled, wheelchair bound professor GN Saibaba, Hem Mishra, Prashant Rahi, Mahesh Tirki and Vijay Tirki were granted acquittal by Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court on 14th October 2022 on the grounds of irregular sanction. The High Court noted that in the absence of proper and legal sanction by appointed sanctioning authority i.e., the Central Government, the trial in the case is null and void, as the trial court didn’t have lawful authority to prosecute in absence of the proper sanction under section 45 (I) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The order sent a wave of joy as Saibaba and others have been incarcerated falsely for over 8 years now with little to nothing relief, even in basic amenities like health care. But as soon as the order came, the Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, acting at the behest of the Brahmanical Hindutva fascist government at the Centre and State, made oral plea in the Supreme Court before the bench of Justice DY Chandrachud to stay the release of Saibaba and others as they are a perceived threat to national security. The SC noted that it cannot stay the acquittal order and turned down the plea. Not much later, when the country and the world was yet to know the relieving news of their acquittal, the Brahmanical Hindutva fascist state made the higher echelons of Judiciary constitute a “Extraordinary Special sitting” by an usually unordinary bench of Justice MR Shah and Bela M Trivedi to hear the Special Leave Petition against the acquittal order on the very next day, 15th October 2022. The question has been raised by various democratic lawyers, jurists and conscious people on the hurriedness and nature of this special sitting. It is also not very surprising as presiding Judge happens to be a supporter of Narendra Modi who has, not very long ago, proclaimed Modi as the “beloved, vibrant and visionary leader”. This very well points out the possible outcome, the hearing of 15th October was set to come out with.
They want to kill every brain, gag every mouth and jail every being who questions the brutal exploitation of people by the big corporates
The judges of SC not paying heed to the reasoning of the High Court in granting acquittal (absence of mandatory legal sanction from appointed legal authority under section 45 (I) of UAPA and principle laid down by Apex Court in Baji Nath Prasad Tripathi vs State of Bhopal) , instead kept dwelling on the issue of merit and the notion of perceived threat to national security. Justice MR Shah, tuning in with SG Tushar Mehta, noted that “in cases of terrorist and Maoist activity, brain is more dangerous and direct involvement is not necessary”, justifying the state’s dangerous narrative of “urban Naxals” to pave way for repression on democratic rights movement. The court didn’t even accept the humanitarian appeal of granting bail to GN Saibaba, who has severe ailments and is 90 percent disabled and suspended the Acquittal order without any basic relief to Saibaba and others, leaving the councils of Saibaba and others with four weeks time to plead their case.
While we look at this case, we need to see the previous practice of the state including the judiciary in their utter disregard to life and personal liberty of the political prisoners. Father Stan Swamy was constantly denied basic amenities like a sipper and medical care by the authorities and the delay by Courts in intervening, which ultimately led to death of our dear father. The same case was repeated with Saibaba’s co-accused Pandu Narote, who was denied medical care by state and died later as a prisoner. Recent death of Kashmiri political prisoner Altaf Ahmad Shah, ailing with cancer, was caused due to deliberate medical negligence in providing necessary care. The list is long to even name.
The state has adopted this vicious modus operandi to silence its critics by killing them one way or the other. Suspension of Saibaba and others’ acquittal order is one such attempt to kill their “dangerous brain”. Same goes for Atiqur Rahman in Hathras case, Gautam Navlakha (diagnosed with cancer), Vernon Gonsalves and Hany Babu in Bhima Koregaon case; because the state wants to kill them and their brains that think, that question and that resists. They want to kill every brain, gag every mouth and jail every being who questions the brutal exploitation of people by the big corporates. They want to keep in jail every voice that foisted the state’s attempt to militarily loot the people of their resources and livelihood through Operation Green-Hunt, which Saibaba and others jailed in Gadchiroli case and Bhima Koregaon case have strongly resisted. They want to do so to continue the exploitation of people and their resources in far off central Indian regions, in North Eastern states, Kashmir and everywhere. This is not just an attack on Saibaba and others but a clear sign of continuing and ever sharpening attack on all involved in the struggle for a democratic society.
We call upon all the democratic, progressive, pro-people, secular and conscious people to resist this blatant attack on democratic right and right to life and personal liberty; stand shoulder to shoulder with Saibaba, Hem, Prashant, Vijay and Mahesh; Demand to uphold their acquittal and grant them immediate, unconditional release; and hold the state responsible for the custodial Mmurder of Pandu Narote.

DEMANDS:
  • Release GN Saibaba, Hem Mishra, Parshant Rahi, Mahesh Tirki, Vijay Tirki immediately and unconditionally
  • Uphold the Bombay High Court’s order granting acquittal GN Saibaba and others.
  • Grant compensation to Pandu Narote's family.
  • Repeal UAPA and all other draconian laws.
  • Release all political prisoners.
---
*AISA, AISF, APCR, Bhim Army, Bigul Mazdoor Dasta, BSCEM, CEM, CRPP, CTF, Disha, DISSC, DSU, DTF, IAPL, IFTU, IMK, Karnataka Janashakti, Lokpaksh, LSI, Mazdoor Adhikar Sangathan, Mazdoor Patrika, Mehnatkash Mahila Sangathan, Morcha Patrika, NAPM, NBS, NCHRO, Nowruz, NTUI, PDSU, People’s Watch, Rihai Manch, Samajwadi Janparishad, Satyashodhak Sangh, SFI, United Against Hate, WSS)

Comments

TRENDING

Political misfires in Bihar: Reasons behind the Opposition's self-inflicted defeat

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The Bihar Vidhansabha Election 2025 verdict is out. I maintained deliberate silence about the growing tribe of “social media” experts and their opinions. Lately, these do not fascinate me. Anyone forming an opinion solely on the basis of these “experts” lives in a fool’s paradise. I do not watch them, nor do I follow them on Twitter. I stayed away partly because I was not certain of a MahaGathbandhan victory, even though I wanted it. But my personal preference is not the issue here. The parties disappointed.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Celebrating 125 yr old legacy of healthcare work of missionaries

Vilas Shende, director, Mure Memorial Hospital By Moin Qazi* Central India has been one of the most fertile belts for several unique experiments undertaken by missionaries in the field of education and healthcare. The result is a network of several well-known schools, colleges and hospitals that have woven themselves into the social landscape of the region. They have also become a byword for quality and affordable services delivered to all sections of the society. These institutions are characterised by committed and compassionate staff driven by the selfless pursuit of improving the well-being of society. This is the reason why the region has nursed and nurtured so many eminent people who occupy high positions in varied fields across the country as well as beyond. One of the fruits of this legacy is a more than century old iconic hospital that nestles in the heart of Nagpur city. Named as Mure Memorial Hospital after a British warrior who lost his life in a war while defending his cou...

Whither GIFT City push? Housing supply soars in Mumbai, Hyderabad, Pune, not Ahmedabad

By Rajiv Shah    A new report by a firm describing itself as a "digital real estate transaction and advisory platform," Proptiger , states that the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) has been the largest contributor to housing units among India's top eight cities currently experiencing a real estate boom. Accounting for 26.9% of all new launches, it is followed by Pune with 18.7% and Hyderabad with 13.6%. These three cities collectively represented 59.2% of the new inventory introduced during the third quarter (July to September 2025), which is the focus of the report’s analysis. 

Only one Indian national park rated ‘good’ by IUCN: Concerns over ecological governance

By A Representative   Environmental policy expert Shankar Sharma has written to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and its affiliated institutions, expressing grave concern over India’s deteriorating ecological health. Citing the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)’s latest global review, which found that only Khangchendzonga National Park received a “Good” rating among 107 national parks, Sharma warned that the findings reveal a “serious concern for the overall health of the country’s flora, fauna, and environment.”

Mergers and privatisation: The Finance Minister’s misguided banking agenda

By Thomas Franco   The Finance Minister has once again revived talk of merging two or three large public sector banks to make them globally competitive. Reports also suggest that the government is considering appointing Managing Directors in public sector banks from the private sector. Both moves would strike at the heart of India’s public banking system . Privatisation undermines the constitutional vision of social and economic justice, and such steps could lead to irreversible damage.

History, culture and literature of Fatehpur, UP, from where Maulana Hasrat Mohani hailed

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Maulana Hasrat Mohani was a member of the Constituent Assembly and an extremely important leader of our freedom movement. Born in Unnao district of Uttar Pradesh, Hasrat Mohani's relationship with nearby district of Fatehpur is interesting and not explored much by biographers and historians. Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri has written a book on Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Fatehpur. The book is in Urdu.  He has just come out with another important book, 'Hindi kee Pratham Rachna: Chandayan' authored by Mulla Daud Dalmai.' During my recent visit to Fatehpur town, I had an opportunity to meet Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri and recorded a conversation with him on issues of history, culture and literature of Fatehpur. Sharing this conversation here with you. Kindly click this link. --- *Human rights defender. Facebook https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat , X @freetohumanity, Skype @vbrawat

From fake interviewer to farmer’s advocate: Akshay Kumar’s surprising role in 'Jolly LLB 3'

By Prof. Hemantkumar Shah*  At the luxurious INOX theatre in Sky City Mall, Borivali East, Mumbai, around seventy upper-middle-class viewers attended the 10:45 a.m. screening of Jolly LLB 3. In the film’s concluding courtroom sequence, Arshad Warsi’s character asks the judge whether he would willingly surrender one of his own homes to the government for a development project in Delhi.