Skip to main content

How this hardcore Marxist-Leninist turned into liberal humanist, 'upholding' civil rights

By Harsh Thakor* 
On October 9 we commemorated the 13th death anniversary of Dr K. Balagopal (1952-2009), a mathematician and a civil rights activist rolled into one, and one of post-independent India’s most creative thinkers. who gave revolutionary humanism a new perspective. Born in Bellary, he grew up in Andhra Pradesh completing his education in the state, finishing up with doctorate in mathematics from the Regional Engineering College, Warangal.
Following a brief period of time in the Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi, where he was a post-doctoral fellow, he returned to his home state and taught at the Kakatiya University until 1985. He relinquished his teaching post following a threat to his life by the police and turned to full-time civil rights work, first with the Andhra Pradesh Civil Liberties Committee (APCLC) as its general secretary for 15 years, and then with the Human Rights Forum (HRF), an organization that he helped found in 1998.
Balagopal belonged to a generation that was crystallised or nurtured during the Indian Emergency of 1975. Arbitrary arrests, detentions without trial and mysterious deaths characterised the authoritarian state. His critical mind made him explore Marxism, analyse the militant Left in Andhra Pradesh, which claimed to represent the backbone of the movements of Dalits and Adivasis.
Balagopal would undertake critical ‘fact-finding’ – enquiring into diverse forms of state violence, including so-called ‘encounters’, tortures in detention, and criminalization of democratic protests. As civil liberties activist, we went around different parts of India. He led frequent fact finding missions to Kashmir, giving a fitting reminder to the Indian state of the alleged crimes committed in that part of the subcontinent in the name of the sovereign nation.
As an APCLC activist, he enquired into instances of violence against Dalits. Arguing that the caste system was a defining form of inequality, he insisted that civil rights groups ought to not only address specific instances of caste violence, but portray caste inequality as a human rights question. 
That is, it is not the state that is the sole culprit in violation of democratic rights, but social relations and institutions too are responsible for caste and gender injustice. He suggested that the history of civil rights ought to be re-evaluated, insisting, the roots of civil rights must be traced within the long legacy of rights struggles that posed a threat to the constitutive inequality of our social systems.
If early Balagopal, as Marxist-Leninist, was an advocate of the ‘new democratic revolution’, later he turned into a ‘liberal humanist', posing questions to the so-called ‘bourgeois’ character of rights. He argued that a right cannot be classed merely as a postulate that is granted by the state to stir popular discontent, but is a norm, defined, affirmed and upheld through people’s struggles for equality and justice.
Such views made him antagonistic with the ideology APCLC, and he left the organization. This was when he and others founded the Human Rights Forum (HRF), a rights organization that understood equality to be an idea “that originated in the fight against Brahminical society that began in the middle of the first millennium BC and continues till today”. He insisted: the philosophy for rights movements cannot be reduced to the views of movements or political actors.
Balagopal took up cases of the most marginal sections, including those related with land rights and right of access to resources. Dedicated to the very core, defending the rights enshrined in the Constitution, he harboured no illusions about the ‘lawless’ nature of the Indian caste society, and pointed towards the dangers posed by the penetration of Hindutva philosophy. He adhered to the view that rights movements must consistently cope with violations that have roots within civil impunity as with those that have state impunity.
Balagopal took up cases of the most marginal sections, including those related with land rights and right of access to resources
In addition to being a civil rights activist, Balagopal was a notable writer in Telugu and English. He innovated a new format of writing, grounded in local details and histories, but which projected the larger picture of the class and caste divisions of a society in regressive transition. He analyse events in immediate as well as historical contexts, and in terms of transforming social and political relationships, amongst classes and castes, and between the Indian people and the Indian state.
Memories always flash in my mind of his laborious work in exposing the stage managed encounters of Naxalite groups. Once he exposed an encounter after facing severe head injuries in Warangal. He would work in the most intense areas of state repression, inviting the police wrath.
No civil liberties activists with such intensity in such a methodological manner defended the mass work of the Naxalite movement, especially that of the erstwhile CPI(ML) Peoples War group in his speeches and writings. With polemical mastery he illustrated the dynamics of a neo-fascist state and how it symbolised oppression of the poor. In journals like the "Economic and Political weekly" in the 1980s and 1990s with incisive Marxist analysis he probed state repression on Naxalite activists, Dalits, minorities and workers.
At the same time, he found how the Maoist groups were turning the civil liberties platform into a party front. He asked activists to come within the fold of the civil rights movement nation wide.
In his ‘Understanding Fascism and Class, Caste and the State’ he portrayed the fascist ascendancy of the Hindu right and of Brahmanism. In ‘Civil Liberties Movement and Revolutionary Violence' he made an analytical dichotomy between the work of the Marxist-Leninist groups with that of the Dalit movement or democratic movement in general. In his ‘Perspective of Rights Movement’ he probed humanism in deep depth, rejecting the Marxist approach. Here he placed class ideology into museum.
It is very hard to analyse what caused Balagopal’s rejection or departure from Marxism. In his last 10 years he attacked the Marxist ideology at the very core. He dwelled on the failure of socialist systems in USSR and China and described the Maoist groups of giving scant respect to the individual.
---
*Freelance journalist who has covered mass movements around India and conducted extensive research on civil liberties movement in India

Comments

TRENDING

Reducing emission? India among top nations whose coal as energy source going up

By NS Venkataraman*  The State of the Global Climate report by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) confirmed that the year 2023 was the warmest year on record, with the global temperature of 1.4 degree celsius above pre-industrial 1850-1900 base line.

Lockdown 'total failure' of science more than of politics: Open letter on 4th anniversary

Counterview Desk  In an open letter to fellow academicians, scientists and medical practitioners in India, marking the fourth anniversary of India's lockdown (25 March 2024), the Managing Committee* of the Universal Health Organisation (UHO) has insisted on the need to "repair two years of immense damage to science".

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

'Wrong direction': Paris NGO regrets MNC ArcelorMittal still using coal-based steel

By Rajiv Shah  A new report by Paris-based non-governmental research and campaigning organization, Reclaim Finance, has blamed the MNC ArcelorMittal – formed in 2006 following the takeover and merger of the western European steel maker Arcelor (Spain, France, and Luxembourg) by Indian-owned Mittal Steel – for using use “climate destructive” metallurgical coal for its projects in India.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Attack on foreign students: Gujarat varsity's reputation, ranking at stake, say academics

Counterview Desk  Expressing anguish over the attack on international students in Gujarat University hostels, a letter claimed to have been signed by 122 current and former academics has asked the Gujarat Vice Chancellor, Dr Neerja Gupta, to provide emotional support to the attacked students and to ensure their physical safety.  

As double engine takes backseat in Odisha, BJP is pitted against 'firmly rooted' BJD

By Sudhansu R Das  BJP has got 25 years to build its party base in Odisha. After 25 years, it felt helpless and insecure to fight elections on its own strength. The party was almost crazy to have an alliance with the ruling BJD in Odisha.  Looking for alliance at the time of election shows that the party has not groomed its grassroots level workers into potential leaders.  The state BJP leaders woke up and convinced the Central leaders that they are capable of going solo; the alliance was stillborn. The question is can BJP defeat BJD which is firmly rooted in Odisha after launching piles of populist programs in the state.