Skip to main content

How this hardcore Marxist-Leninist turned into liberal humanist, 'upholding' civil rights

By Harsh Thakor* 
On October 9 we commemorated the 13th death anniversary of Dr K. Balagopal (1952-2009), a mathematician and a civil rights activist rolled into one, and one of post-independent India’s most creative thinkers. who gave revolutionary humanism a new perspective. Born in Bellary, he grew up in Andhra Pradesh completing his education in the state, finishing up with doctorate in mathematics from the Regional Engineering College, Warangal.
Following a brief period of time in the Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi, where he was a post-doctoral fellow, he returned to his home state and taught at the Kakatiya University until 1985. He relinquished his teaching post following a threat to his life by the police and turned to full-time civil rights work, first with the Andhra Pradesh Civil Liberties Committee (APCLC) as its general secretary for 15 years, and then with the Human Rights Forum (HRF), an organization that he helped found in 1998.
Balagopal belonged to a generation that was crystallised or nurtured during the Indian Emergency of 1975. Arbitrary arrests, detentions without trial and mysterious deaths characterised the authoritarian state. His critical mind made him explore Marxism, analyse the militant Left in Andhra Pradesh, which claimed to represent the backbone of the movements of Dalits and Adivasis.
Balagopal would undertake critical ‘fact-finding’ – enquiring into diverse forms of state violence, including so-called ‘encounters’, tortures in detention, and criminalization of democratic protests. As civil liberties activist, we went around different parts of India. He led frequent fact finding missions to Kashmir, giving a fitting reminder to the Indian state of the alleged crimes committed in that part of the subcontinent in the name of the sovereign nation.
As an APCLC activist, he enquired into instances of violence against Dalits. Arguing that the caste system was a defining form of inequality, he insisted that civil rights groups ought to not only address specific instances of caste violence, but portray caste inequality as a human rights question. 
That is, it is not the state that is the sole culprit in violation of democratic rights, but social relations and institutions too are responsible for caste and gender injustice. He suggested that the history of civil rights ought to be re-evaluated, insisting, the roots of civil rights must be traced within the long legacy of rights struggles that posed a threat to the constitutive inequality of our social systems.
If early Balagopal, as Marxist-Leninist, was an advocate of the ‘new democratic revolution’, later he turned into a ‘liberal humanist', posing questions to the so-called ‘bourgeois’ character of rights. He argued that a right cannot be classed merely as a postulate that is granted by the state to stir popular discontent, but is a norm, defined, affirmed and upheld through people’s struggles for equality and justice.
Such views made him antagonistic with the ideology APCLC, and he left the organization. This was when he and others founded the Human Rights Forum (HRF), a rights organization that understood equality to be an idea “that originated in the fight against Brahminical society that began in the middle of the first millennium BC and continues till today”. He insisted: the philosophy for rights movements cannot be reduced to the views of movements or political actors.
Balagopal took up cases of the most marginal sections, including those related with land rights and right of access to resources. Dedicated to the very core, defending the rights enshrined in the Constitution, he harboured no illusions about the ‘lawless’ nature of the Indian caste society, and pointed towards the dangers posed by the penetration of Hindutva philosophy. He adhered to the view that rights movements must consistently cope with violations that have roots within civil impunity as with those that have state impunity.
Balagopal took up cases of the most marginal sections, including those related with land rights and right of access to resources
In addition to being a civil rights activist, Balagopal was a notable writer in Telugu and English. He innovated a new format of writing, grounded in local details and histories, but which projected the larger picture of the class and caste divisions of a society in regressive transition. He analyse events in immediate as well as historical contexts, and in terms of transforming social and political relationships, amongst classes and castes, and between the Indian people and the Indian state.
Memories always flash in my mind of his laborious work in exposing the stage managed encounters of Naxalite groups. Once he exposed an encounter after facing severe head injuries in Warangal. He would work in the most intense areas of state repression, inviting the police wrath.
No civil liberties activists with such intensity in such a methodological manner defended the mass work of the Naxalite movement, especially that of the erstwhile CPI(ML) Peoples War group in his speeches and writings. With polemical mastery he illustrated the dynamics of a neo-fascist state and how it symbolised oppression of the poor. In journals like the "Economic and Political weekly" in the 1980s and 1990s with incisive Marxist analysis he probed state repression on Naxalite activists, Dalits, minorities and workers.
At the same time, he found how the Maoist groups were turning the civil liberties platform into a party front. He asked activists to come within the fold of the civil rights movement nation wide.
In his ‘Understanding Fascism and Class, Caste and the State’ he portrayed the fascist ascendancy of the Hindu right and of Brahmanism. In ‘Civil Liberties Movement and Revolutionary Violence' he made an analytical dichotomy between the work of the Marxist-Leninist groups with that of the Dalit movement or democratic movement in general. In his ‘Perspective of Rights Movement’ he probed humanism in deep depth, rejecting the Marxist approach. Here he placed class ideology into museum.
It is very hard to analyse what caused Balagopal’s rejection or departure from Marxism. In his last 10 years he attacked the Marxist ideology at the very core. He dwelled on the failure of socialist systems in USSR and China and described the Maoist groups of giving scant respect to the individual.
---
*Freelance journalist who has covered mass movements around India and conducted extensive research on civil liberties movement in India

Comments

TRENDING

Lip-service on World Environment Day vs 'watered-down' eco-safeguards

By Shankar Sharma*  Just a few days ago, the world remembered the routinely forgotten global environment on the occasion of World Environment Day, briefly though, maybe just for the day. There were reports of a few high profile ceremonies in different parts of the country, including a few in New Delhi. Prime Minister Narendra Modi reportedly asked the people of our country to plant one tree per each person as a mark of respect/ gratitude for our mothers.

New Odia CM's tribal heritage 'sets him apart' from Hindutva Brahminical norms

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Mohan Charan Majhi took the oath as the new Chief Minister of Odisha following the electoral defeat of the BJD led by Naveen Patnaik, who served as Chief Minister for twenty-four years. The new Chief Minister is the son of a security guard and a four-time MLA who hails from the remote village of Raikala in the Keonjhar district. He belongs to the Santali tribe and comes from a working-class family. Such achievements and political mobilities are possible only in a democratic society. Majhi’s leadership even in the form of symbolic representation in a democracy deserves celebration.

Pellet gun fire severely injures Dalit worker off Bangladesh border

By Kirity Roy*  This is regarding an incident of firing pellets by the Border Security Force (BSF) personnel attached with Panchadoji Border Outpost of ‘E’ Company of 90 BSF Battalion on a Schedule Caste youth of village Parmananda under Dinhata Police Station of Cooch Behar district of West Bengal. The victim was severely injured and one portion of his face became disfigured due to pellet firing by the BSF.

Sanction to persecute Arundhati Roy under UAPA politically motivated: PUCL

Counterview Network  Top human rights group, People’s Union for Civil Liberties, has demanded that the authorities should immediately withdraw the prosecution against top author Arundhati Roy and Dr Sheikh Showkat Hussain, a Kashmir academic, under the " unconstitutional"  Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act  (UAPA), calling the Delhi  Lieutenant-Governor nod for the Delhi police move "politically motivated".

What stops Kavach? Why no time to focus on common trains meant for common people?

By Atanu Roy  A goods train rammed into Kanchenjunga Express on 17th June morning in North Bengal. This could have been averted if the time tested anti-collision system (Kavach) was in place. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.