Skip to main content

Not true: India's syncretism 'developed' by Gandhi, Bose, Nehru; it's pre-British

By Osman Sher* 

According to Dr Ram Puniyani all the three great leaders of modern India, Gandhi, Bose and Nehru, believed in an independent India that would bring together different philosophical, religious, and cultural principles and practices. True, but this syncretism has not been limited only to modern times.
In fact, it is the hallmark of the Indian culture and governance. It had started as early as 550 BC with the rule of Bimbisara and Ajatashatru, the rulers of Magadh (South Bihar) and the first Empire builders, when Buddhism and Jainism took birth, and the rulers were believed to be followers of both the religions along with their own Vedic religion. The people too accepted both the religions with no friction in the society.
History is replete with instances of syncretism of the rulers, both by words and actions. As it will be a dissertation to make a mention of all those here, I would suffice to give the instances only of two greatest rulers of the subcontinent, Asoka and Akbar.
Asoka’s preaching on rock edicts is full of respect for other religions. However, to quote only one, he writes in Rock Edict VII:
“But Devanumpriya (Beloved of the gods or Asoka himself)) does not consider gifts of honor to be as important as the essential advancement of all sects. Its basis is the control of one’s speech, so as not to excel one’s own sect or disparage that of another on unsuitable occasions...
"On such occasions one should honor another man’s sect, for by doing so one increases the influence of one’s own sect and benefits that of the other man, while, by doing otherwise one diminishes the influence of one’s own sect and harms the other man’s...therefore concord is to be commended so that men may hear one another’s principles.”

Akbar expressed his views on the religion and his people as:
“Although I am the master of so vast a kingdom, and all the instruments of governments are in my hand, yet since the greatness consists in doing the will of God, my mind is not at ease in this diversity of sects and creeds; and apart from this outward pomp of circumstances, with what satisfaction, in my despondency, can I undertake the sway of empire?"
In the General Council of the learned men, he addressed:
“We ought, therefore, to bring them all into one religion in such a fashion that they be both ‘one’ and ‘all’ with the great advantage of not losing what is good in any one religion, while gaining whatever is better in another. In that way honor would be rendered to God, peace would be given to the people, and security to the Empire.”
Episode of hatred among communities started with British, who had a purpose: divide the nation in religious groups
Therefore, by culling the best features of all religions, he gave his Deen-e-Ilahi in 1582.
Since the dawn of history, India has never experienced communal riots and mob lynching on the basis of religion. At the highest level, efforts have been made by the kings and the regional rajahs themselves to create harmony among the communities.
Setting aside the episodes of struggle for political powers and the ensuing brutalities at higher level, strife and agitation at ground level have been generally absent. Even the British could not twist the history in this regard. Any modern writing or verbal speeches to the contrary are mere propaganda and travesty of history.
Undoubtedly, this episode of hatred among the communities had started with the British, who had a purpose: divide the nation in religious groups, do not face their combined resistance, and rule comfortably. But the policy of the present government is without any purpose and is centred round pure hate.
One more point towards Dr Ram Puniyan's learned piece of writing. He is of the opinion that the present Government is only against Islam and Christianity because they are “foreign religions”. It is not so simple to say that there are only two religions. People are encouraged to perpetrate atrocities on their own fellow- religionists, the Dalits, because Manusmriti says so.
Nay, the Sikhs, the Buddhists, and the Jains are in the queue.
*This is a rejoinder to Ram Puniyani's article, distributed by JanVikalp



'Enough evidence' in Indian tradition to support legal basis for same-sex marriage

By Iyce Malhotra, Joseph Mathai, Sandeep Chachra*  The ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage provides space for much-needed conversations on issues that have hitherto remained “invisible” or engaged with patriarchal locker room humour. We must recognize that people with diverse sexualities and complex gender identities have faced discrimination, stigma and decades of oppression. Their issues have mainly remained buried in dominant social discourse, and many view them with deep insecurities.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Victim of communal violence, Christians in Manipur want Church leadership to speak up

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  The first eleven days of May 2023 have, in many ways, been a defining period of Indian history! Plenty has happened in a rapid-fire stream of events. Ironically, each one of them are indicators of how crimes and the criminalisation of society has become the ‘new norm’; these include, the May Day rallies with a focus on the four labour codes which are patently against the rights of workers; the U S Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) released its Annual Report on 1 May stating that conditions for religious freedom in India “continued to worsen in 2022”; the continued protest by the Indian women wrestlers at Jantar Mantar for the expulsion of the chief of the Indian Wrestlers Federation on very serious allegations; the Elections in Karnataka on 10 May (with communalism and corruption as the mainstay); the release of the fake, derogative and insensitive film ‘The Kerala Story’; the release of World Free Press Index on 3 May which places India

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

Polygamy in India "down" in 45 yrs: Muslims' from 5.7 to 2.55%, Hindus' 5.8 to 1.77%, "common" in SCs, STs

By Rajiv Shah Amidst All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) justifying polygamy, saying it “meets social and moral needs and the provision for it stems from concern and sympathy for women”, facts suggest the the practice is down from 5.7 per cent of Muslim families in 1961 to 2.55 per cent in 2006.

India joining US sponsored trade pillar to hurt Indian farmers, 'promote' GM seeds, food

Counterview Desk  As many as 32 civil society organisations (CSOs), in a letter to Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and India joining the trade pillar, have said that its provisions will allow the US to ensure a more favourable regulatory regime “for enhancing its exports of genetically modified (GM) seeds and GM food”, underlining, it will “significantly hurt the livelihoods of Indian farmers.”

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Modi govt 'wholly untrustworthy' on Covid data, censored criticism on pandemic: Lancet

By Rajiv Shah*   One of the world’s most prestigious health journals, brought out from England, has sharply criticised the Narendra Modi government for being “wholly untrustworthy on Covid-19 health data”, stating, the “official government figures place deaths at more than 530 000, while WHO excess death estimates for 2020 and 2021 are near 4·7 million.”

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam* In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.