Skip to main content

'Varsetile' Amitabh Bacchan symbolises crass materialism that has governed Bollywood

By Harsh Thakor* 

On October 11, superstar Amitabh Bachhan turned 80. He still rocks and rules Bollywood after five decades, standing at the top of the pedestal, with no other star even close to his longevity. No star has equally fired the imagination of the Indian public or penetrated through their hearts. He defined or advertised Bollywood more than any actor ever.
Yet it is regretful that this icon has failed to be charitable or serve social causes, and leaves no stone unturned in multiplying his wealth through advertisements. He is a manifestation of the crass materialism or narcasm that governs Bollywood. At any cost he sells himself to endorsements to make money. He has never raised his voice against any social injustice, corruption etc.
Amitabh has virtually played a role as a mascot for the corporates and has been master as a manipulator. Unlike Amir Khan he has never raised his voice against oppression on minorities, nor has he cared to favour any people’s struggle against poverty or protested unjust wars. He was virtually unmoved by the recent farmers struggle in Delhi. In his time Dilip Kumar took up many a social causes.
Amitabh has rarely enacted social roles, like even Shah Rukh Khan did, or many other Hollywood stars. He expressed harsh words for firms like ‘Slumdog India' and hardly had much to say about Satyajit Ray. Whatever spirit of rebellion he manifested against the social system on the screen, he extinguished it in real life consistently, serving as mascot for the establishment.
I would fail to recognize the Amitabh of today with that of the 1970s, virtually looking like two persons. However, the essence of the soul remained intact, like life taking another form. I can't forget choreographer Shiamak Davar describing the Big B, walking and his projection of him, as the ultimate epitome of self-discipline.
Amitabh was not the most talented of actors or conventionally good looking, but his very demeanour captured the hearts of the public. No Bollywood artist matched Amitabh's discipline, perseverance or endurance. He was one of the very few stars who always obeyed the director, never entering into clashes, like fellow stars. Every ounce of energy was invested by Amitabh to give justice to the character he was enacting.
Even when the wind was blowing his way, he never got carried away, and put he every inch of effort in the character of a role assigned. Few stars ever appeared more clinical or being groomed in an acting school. In deep depth he imbibed the language of the audiences. To quote Javed Akhtar, “Even at the age of 80 every shot for Amitabh is his first shot of his life, with his career depending upon it.”
No doubt, Amitabh does not possess the natural talent or intensity of Dilip Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar or Raj Kapoor, or acting skill of Nasiruddin Shah or Balraj Sahni. What propelled him to the very top of the table was his sense of perception, intelligence, discipline and hard work.
Great stars like Rajesh Khanna, Salman Khan and Shah Rukh Khan ruled Bollywood like emperors, but ultimately stuck to cultivated mannerisms as superstars, instead of remaining consummate actors. Amitabh, in spite of being a brand, consistently immersing into the skin of the role.
With mastery, Amitabh adapted himself to different times unlike anyone. In spite of not being as lively or possessing a joie de vie as some superstars, he is still versatility personified. In the modern times only Nasiruddin Shah has surpassed Amitabh as a pure actor, and Amir Khan has come within touching distance of him. As a pure actor Nasiruddin Shah places Amitabh in the highest league.
Amitabh has had many hits in film with co stars like Dharmendra, Shashi Kapoor, Shatrugan Sinha and Vinod Khanna. He exhibited high skill in blending with other stars, enabling them to flourish in their roles. In his lifetime Amitabh expressed respect to legends like Dilip Kumar, Raj Kapoor, Waheeda Rehman, Nutan, Sanjeev Kumar and Rajesh Khanna. He held directors like Guru Dutt, Gulzar and Yash Chopra in great esteem.
Amitabh gave his first flashes on the Bollywood screen in late 1960s and early 1970s with roles ranging from an angry rebel to a romantic lead. In spite of lacking conventional charm he was buoyancy personified in films like ‘Zanjeer’, and manifested virtuosity in 'Sat Hindustani'. As an inspector in ‘Zanjeer’ he exhibited conviction and vengeance at its superlative height. Even when he underplayed he bubbled in his own right, exhibiting restraint even when expressing conviction.
In ‘Anand’, as Babu Moshai, although mellowed, Amitabh gave very fine acting performance with cancer patient, like boat unruffled in a storm. With surgical craft, he handled a dying Rajesh Khannna. In ‘Namak Haram’, in most clinical manner, he portrayed how friendship and chain of events transfuse a complete change in an individual. In ‘Bombay to Goa’ in most natural style he carried a romantic lead.
Amitabh even gave a highly nuanced performance in ‘Saudagar’ as a seller of gur. In the very tune of the character he illustrated the base of feudal culture. In ‘Majboor’ he exuded grace and balance playing a role of man chasing the real assassin of a person he is claimed to have killed. He even overshadowed Dharmendra, in enacting vengeance in that film.
Amitabh sold himself as brand in Bollywood, which denied him revealing his prowess in art films or in true character roles
As Jai in 'Sholay' Amitabh exhibited prowess in projecting an introvert character in love with Radha enacted by Jaya Bahaduri, with most subtle expression, and his death scene ranks amongst the most heart touching in Bollywood. In 'Deewar’ he brilliantly projected the transition of a common man turning to crime, as a result of circumstances, portrays transition from dock worker to a smuggler, being in the very skin of the character. In 'Amar Akbar Anthony’ (1977) he displayed great flair in enacting comedy as a streetsmart bootlegger, giving a new perspective to his acting.
Amitabh in 'Kabhi Kabhie’ exhibited subtle or poetic romanticism in youth and a high degree of sensitivity in middle aged role. In ‘Trishul’ his intensity and thirst for revenge for the fate of his abandoned mother goes beyond the limits. In a double role in ‘Don’ he surgically contrasted a professional criminal from a street vendor. In ‘Roti Kapda or Makan' as part of an all star cast with complete conviction he illustrated a person frustrated with evils of social injustice. In ‘Kaala Patthar’, again as part of a star cast, he championed the cause of miners’ welfare, giving essence to the role of miners staging a rebellion.
It was in 'Adaalat' where Amitabh scaled acting intensity, sensitivity or skill, in regions rarely penetrated. His performance in his death scene even surpassed that of ‘Sholay.’ With articulate skill he portrayed what transformed him into a smuggler. In 'Muqaddar ka Sikander' he championed morality and portrayed love in a most subtle manner.
In the 1980s Amitabh had to adjust to a time when violence had reached a height unscaled. In ‘Coolie’ he was almost killed in an accident, in ‘Agneepath’ ‘Shahenshah’ and ‘Desh Premi’ he projected the pulse of the time, carrying the mantle of justice .With great malleability he cast the character of vengeance in ‘Shahenshah.’ His best performance of the 1980’s was in ‘Sharaabi’, when he enacted an alcoholic in the trance of deep love, giving shades of the great Dilip Kumar in drunken scenes. With skill of a painter he illustrated how circumstances transform or victimise an individual and the state of man in flux.
Amitabh dabbled in politics, standing by Rajiv Gandhi in November 1984, in Allahabad, winning 68% o votes cast. However, in 1987 he bid farewell to politics, after his name was defaced in the Bofors scandal. There was a powerful trend of Amitabh’s films going downhill in the mid 1980s, lacking the punch of yester years. It is ironic that in 1990 after 21 years, he was the recipient of the best national actor award for ‘Agneepath.’
In later years, it is hard to envisage any other actor doing better justice to the role of teaching a deaf and dumb girl in 'Black' based on the story of Helen Keller, where Amitabh expressed intensity of coal burning -- one of the most articulate exhibitions of acting skill in Bollywood. In 'Cheeni Kum' with subtle nuances he enacted the role of chef entangled in a love affair. In 'Baghban' with great sensitivity he manifested virtuosity. In 'Mohabattein' he enacting a principal, he literally makes the students tremble. In ‘Sarkar’ (2005) he played a don in politics, impersonating Bal Thackeray, penetrating the very soul o the character.
In ‘Paa’ he took emotional sensitivity to a melting point, touching the very core of your soul. His sheer energy transcended boundaries unparalleled. Playing a witty 12-year-old boy suffering from the rare genetic disorder called progeria, which ages children rapidly. Here, he reverse-aged himself in the sense that he was playing someone with the physical age of a 70 plus person but the mental agility of a twelve-year-old. In ‘Piku’ with high craft, he portrays eccentricity of person, perpetually troubled by constipation. Possibly e saw the better side of Amitabh’s acting in his later years not being cast as a hero.
Amitabh sold himself as brand in Bollywood, which denied him revealing his prowess in art films or in true character roles. Many of the roles he played were reminiscent of a brand. Even when enacting common man characters like in ‘Coolie’, he had to dance to the tune of projecting a star rather than the life of a real life person. We saw much more of Amitabh the star, instead of the actor. Crystallised as a legend, it is sad that the Indian public turned him into a demi-god.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar’s views on religion as Tagore’s saw them

By Harasankar Adhikari   Religion has become a visible subject in India’s public discourse, particularly where it intersects with political debate. Recent events, including a mass Gita chanting programme in Kolkata and other incidents involving public expressions of faith, have drawn attention to how religion features in everyday life. These developments have raised questions about the relationship between modern technological progress and traditional religious practice.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Uttarakhand tunnel disaster: 'Question mark' on rescue plan, appraisal, construction

By Bhim Singh Rawat*  As many as 40 workers were trapped inside Barkot-Silkyara tunnel in Uttarkashi after a portion of the 4.5 km long, supposedly completed portion of the tunnel, collapsed early morning on Sunday, Nov 12, 2023. The incident has once again raised several questions over negligence in planning, appraisal and construction, absence of emergency rescue plan, violations of labour laws and environmental norms resulting in this avoidable accident.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.