Skip to main content

Gender-based discrimination 'extremely high' in employment: Oxfam India study

Counterview Desk
A scholarly report, brought out by Oxfam India, claiming to “a movement against all forms of discrimination and one that aims to contribute to the building of a discrimination-free India”, has said that while there has been a decline in discrimination within the labour market in India over a decadal timeframe, this is characterised by high gender inequity so much so that the probability of a woman being employed in decent jobs has no bearing on her endowments.
Titled The India Discrimination Report 2022, the seeks to focus on differential access to labour market (absorption and wages), factor market (access to credit) and endowment market (access to hospitalisation) for different socio-religious and gender groups. Even as attempting to capture the extent of identity-based discrimination, it explains the gaps in access to employment and in wages, credit and health facilities in the context of formation of human capital across different castes, tribal and religious identities and gender.
Principal author of the report, Dr Amitabh Kundu, Professor Emeritus, L.J. University, Ahmedabad, talks to Counterview on major findings of the report.


Q: We understand that “India Discrimination Report 2022”, brought out last month by Oxfam India, is focused on labour market. As the principal author of the Report, kindly tell us the scope and coverage of the Report.
A: Indeed, four of the six chapters of the Report, excluding that on Conclusion and Recommendations, analyse the trends and pattern of discrimination in labour market over the period from 2004 to 2020, focusing on gender, caste and religious dimensions. An attempt has been made here to statistically determine the magnitude of discrimination at different points of time. The Report argues that the inequality in access to employment and gaps in earnings across different groups of population can not be explained in terms of differences in their capabilities, such as levels of education, work experience and learning from family members or peer groups. A large part of the disparity is due to their social identities. Women, SC/ST and Muslims are taken as vulnerable groups and in each case comparison is made between their employment status with the rest of the population, in an attempt to bifurcate the total inequality/gap into two components: one due to difference in capabilities and the other attributed to gender, cast and religious identities.
I must add that, besides the labour market (access to employment and earnings), discrimination, factor market (access to credit) and endowment market (access to hospitalization) discrimination for SC/ST and gender groups have also been analysed in two chapters in the Report.
Q: What are the broad results of the study?
A: The Report attempts to capture the extent of identity-based discrimination, explaining the gaps in access to employment and in wages across different castes, tribal and religious identities and gender. The analysis of the labour market covers different types of jobs viz. regular, casual and self-employment and disparities in earnings following a standard methodology for determining discrimination.
The study demonstrates that discrimination within the labour market in India over the past decade and a half, is characterized by high gender inequity so much so that the probability of a woman being employed in decent jobs have no bearing on her endowments. In simple terms, this also means worker, non-worker status of women does not significantly depend on her educational qualifications as a large segment of women with equal level of education or experience are sitting outside the labour market. This leads to the alarming result, emerging from the methodology employed in the study, that gender discrimination is almost total in the country.
Gender-based discrimination is found to be extremely high in all categories of employment and in both rural and urban areas. The high degree of gender discrimination manifests in a large segment of well-qualified women not ‘wanting’ to join the labour market because of household responsibilities or “social status” within the community or in caste hierarchy (wherein norms constrain their active participation in labour force). It is also patriarchy that makes a large segment of women, who have the same or even higher qualifications, stay outside employment, and this has shown no improvement over time, besides the gender bias and mindset of the employers.
Q: You mentioned of high gender based discrimination in labour market which has not declined over time. How about discrimination against SC/ST population vis-a-vis that against Muslims?

A: Discrimination against the SC/ST population in the labour market is notably high but has gone down marginally as their level of education and other measurable endowments have improved over time due to government policies of reservation, leading to their empowerment. Religion-based discrimination is relatively low only because Muslims get absorbed in low-value family-based occupations wherein they face less competition. In particular, their level of discrimination works out as low through the model in access to employment and wages because of their formal endowments that are also low. This result, however, must not lead to complacency. This low discrimination is largely because Muslims have certain professional skills in low-earning non-agricultural activities, acquired through family and peer group, in repair/maintenance, carpentry, construction etc. and these skills could not be included in the model due to non availability of national level data from any source. However, in urban labour market, discrimination in access to employment works out as very high, much more than against SC/ST population, and this has not gone down over the years.
Q: How did the pandemic affect labour market discrimination across different social and gender groups?
A: The study focuses on two quarters, one before the pandemic, January to March in 2020, and the first quarter of the pandemic viz. April-June 2020. The analysis of the data in two quarters, focusing on three vulnerable communities, SC/ST, Muslims and Women among regular workers, self-employed and casual workers suggests that the overall impact of the pandemic has been severe in urban areas due to the national lockdown, directly affecting urban business. The impact of the lockdown on agrarian economy has been low since it disrupted movement of goods and services, severely hitting the non agricultural activities. The sharpest rise in unemployment, here, is noted for Muslims paralyzing their system of livelihood. The increase in unemployment in the case of urban areas is alarmingly high but this is so both for SC/ST and Muslim population. The increase is high also for upper caste Hindu population but is somewhat modest.
Q: How did the pandemic impact women’s engagement in labour market and their earnings?
A: Gender discrimination in India is structural which results in great disparities between the earnings of men and women under ‘normal circumstances’ -- meaning the pre-Covid period. This can be inferred from the data for 2004-05 and 2018-19. The earning gaps are large, both in rural and urban areas for casual workers, ranging between 50 per cent and 70 per cent. The range is low for regular workers with the earnings of men exceeding those of women by 20 to 60 per cent. In the case of the self-employed, the disparity is much higher, with men earning 4 to 5 times that of women.
In the first pandemic quarter -- April-June 2020 -- women record high increase in unemployment in urban areas but it is similar to that of men. In rural areas, however, this is less than that of men. This is because here a majority of women are engaged in agriculture and household-based activities, wherein disruption due to lockdown is relatively less severe, except for casual employment. It is important to note that many persons in regular, casual or self-employed categories, despite not doing any work during the reference week due to certain exigency, report some income, because of the nature of the contract or employer-employee relationship. Women, however, are at a great disadvantage in this regard, both in rural and urban areas. While only 9 per cent among the self-employed men report not having any income for not doing work during the reference week in the pandemic, the figure is as high as 70 per cent for women as per the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) 2020. The study shows that the lockdown disrupted employment and wages for Muslims in rural areas while SC/ST groups bore the brunt of the losses in urban areas. Government machinery needs to address their specific problems, particularly in periods of such exigency.



IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).

Women innovators on simple, revolutionary alternate solutions for water problems

By Proshakha Maitra, Mansee Bal Bhargava* The detrimental effects of uncontrolled population rise and accelerated change in the global climate have posed tremendous pressure on the water and sanitation. This calls all stakeholders, from both developed and developing nations, to improve their resilience and to instigate sustainability. It is more crucial than ever to optimise the use of the resources we have on hand since the world population is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050.

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Alleged killing of another Bangladesh youth inside Indian territory: NHRC inquiry sought

By Kirity Roy* There was yet another incident of the killing of a Bangladeshi youth by the Border Security Force personnel attached with ‘Barthar’ BOP of ‘G’ Company of 75 BSF Battalion. In last five years several incidents of killings happened under this police station’s jurisdiction and the cases will get the award as “Not Guilty” as usual.

Modi model, Hindutva icon 'justified' alliance with Muslim League before Independence

By Shamsul Islam*  Our PM describes himself as ‘Hindu’ nationalist and member of RSS. He proudly shares the fact that he was groomed to be a political leader by one of the two fathers of the Hindutva politics, MS Golwalkar (the other being VD Savarkar) and given the task of establishing Hindutva polity in India after eradicating secularism.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Crusader for people’s causes, this Hollywood actor entered 'unexplored zones' in US

By Harsh Thakor*  Marlon Brando on April 3rd completes his birth centenary. He perished in 2004, on July 1, aged 80 years. Arguably in Hollywood Brando penetrated sensitivity and versatility at an unparalleled scale and discovered new horizons or explored path breaking zones in acting.

Nuclear power expansion: Is AEC's new, 'unrealistic' target fully backed by PMO?

By Shankar Sharma*  Another unrealistic and tall claim by Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) has been announced: India is eyeing 100 GW nuclear power by 2047, the AEC chairman  AK Mohanty   has said. A few years ago, the dream target for the Indian nuclear establishment was 275,000 MWe of nuclear power by 2050 (as per DAE document of 2008 "A Strategy for the Growth of Electricity in India”). Now this target of 100 GW nuclear power by 2047. And as at the end of February 2024, the actual nuclear power capacity was only 7,480 MWe, which formed only 1.7% of the total power capacity in the country. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site The article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

How huge crowd at Mukhtar Ansari funeral is comparable to BJP's 'people's court' talk

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The massive crowd at the funeral of Mukhtar Ansari in Mohammadabad reflects the power and influence that his family wields in the area. One can't deny that he had enormous power in Ghazipur and Mau districts. But the crowd that came and chanted slogans in his favour does not exonerate him of his conviction by the court.  It is important that we understand this.