Skip to main content

Illegitimate raiding, subsequent harassment imposed by the BSF upon woman

Kirity Roy, Secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha, writes to the Chairman, National Human Rights Commission, on vandalism by BSF:
***
I am writing this present complaint on an incident of criminal trespass, sabotage and loot of private property and outraged the modesty of one woman namely Ms.Azifa (Name changed) Bibi of Bhoram village under Dinhata-II block and Dinhata Police Station in the district of Cooch Behar by the BSF personnel attached with Gitaldaha Border Out Post, ‘B’ Company, Battalion number 90.
The village is situated inside Indian Territory, about 3 kilometers from the Indo-Bangladesh Border Pillar (IBP). Cattle smuggling from this side of the border is frequent. On 31.08.2022 at about 3.25 pm about 20/25 Border Security Force personnel along with Company Commander of the Gitaldaha Border Out Post, ‘B’ Company, Battalion number 90 criminally trespassed the house of the victim and vandalized her house in the name of raiding. Border Security Force personnel also misbehaved with the woman victim by touching her breast and private parts of her body. Even the female victim was forced to naked by the BSF personnel. They looted Rs. 21,000/- cash and gold ornaments.
On 01.09.2022 Ms.Azifa (Name changed) Bibi, lodged one written complaint to the Dinhata Police Station which was not acknowledged by the police officials of the Dinhata Police Station. Later the victim woman submitted another written complaint to the Superintendent of Police of Cooch Behar district through registered post on 06.09.2022 with request to investigate and stop such incidents from happening in the future. But no action in this regard has been taken yet.
The above stated facts and circumstances established that the perpetrator BSF personnel committed abuse of powers by encroaching upon the personal liberty, dignity, honour, criminal trespass and privacy of individual citizens. The incidents also established the degrading behavior of the perpetrator BSF personnel. The tyranny and oppression committed by the perpetrator BSF personnel is violation of fundamental rights and human rights as enshrined in national and international laws and covenants.
Needless to remind that the Commission had held the two-day human rights sensitization programme for BSF personnel posted at Indo-Bangladesh Border at Kolkata on 16-17 February, 2012. Already about ten years elapsed since the programme, but still it appears that the perpetrator BSF personnel is not inclined to respect the human rights of its own citizens thereby violating the caution given by the Supreme Court of India in D.K. Basu VS State of West Bengal case where it observed that “the State must ensure that the various agencies deployed by it act within the bounds of the law and not become law unto themselves”.
The illegitimate raiding and subsequent harassment imposed by the BSF upon the woman victim Ms. Azifa (Name changed) Bibi is not only challenging their life and livelihood but also violating the Articles 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India. The incident also violates Article 3 (Right to life, liberty and security); Article 5 (Freedom from torture, cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment); Article 7 (Equality before law and equal protection of laws) and Article 8 (Right to effective remedy) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The present incident is also against the premises of Article 7 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the Government of India ratified the said UN instrument. The perpetrator BSF personnel also violated the code of conduct for law enforcement officials adopted by UN General Assembly in 1979 which mandates that these officials shall respect and protect human dignity and maintain and uphold the human rights of all persons. The act of the perpetrator BSF personnel attracts section 441 (Criminal trespass) and section 354 (Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty) of Indian Penal Code. The BSF personnel have also violated provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code that require for the presence of female officers while searching or arresting a woman. Police personnel of Dinhata Police Station refused to register the case of the above referred incident. This violates section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the apex court judgment in Lalita Kumari vs. State of U.P. & others (AIR 214 SC187) which makes it mandatory for them to lodge a FIR in cases of cognizable offences.
Hence I request your urgent intervention in this matter with the following demands:-
  • The BSF should be posted in the actual border and not inside villages.
  • The complaint lodged by the woman victim must be acknowledged and registered and legal action must be initiated against the perpetrator BSF personnel invoking the appropriate provisions and procedure of law
  • The BSF authority must be directed to protect the interest of the villagers.
  • BSF personnel engaged in whimsical raiding, threatening and harassing villagers should be show caused.
  • Take necessary steps to eradicate cattle smuggling in the border.
  • Perpetrator Border Security Force personnel should be held liable under the provision of Criminal trespass into the household of the victims.
  • The victims must be compensated for violation of her human rights.
  • Any other suitable direction as the Commission may deem fit and appropriate.

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.
Post a Comment
»

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.
Post a Comment
»

When tourism meets tribal law: The Vanajangi dispute in Andhra Pradesh

By Palla Trinadha Rao   A writ petition presently before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh has brought into focus an increasingly important question in the governance of tribal regions: can eco-tourism projects in Scheduled Areas be implemented without the consent of the Gram Sabha? The case concerns the establishment of a Community Based Eco-Tourism centre at Vanajangi village in Paderu Mandal of Alluri Sitarama Raju District, a region located within the Scheduled Areas of Andhra Pradesh. 
Post a Comment
»

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 
Post a Comment
»

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.
Post a Comment
»

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.
Post a Comment
»

The ultimate all-time ODI XI: A personal selection of icons across eras

By Harsh Thakor* This is my all-time best XI chosen for ODI (One Day International) cricket:  1. Adam Gilchrist (W) – The absolute master blaster who could create the impact of exploding gunpowder with his electrifying strokeplay. No batsman was more intimidating in his era. Often his knocks decided the fate of games as though the result were premeditated. He escalated batting strike rates to surreal realms.
Post a Comment
»

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".
51 comments
»

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.
Post a Comment
»