Patriotism for marks? Gujarat University’s five-mark tiranga yatra

By Prof. Hemantkumar Shah*

The Registrar of Gujarat University wrote a letter on 11 August 2025 to the principals of all affiliated colleges and the directors of the university’s postgraduate departments.

In it, he stated that on 13 August at 11:00 a.m., a Tiranga Yatra (Tricolour March) would be organised at the university, and that a coordinator should be sent along with the students.

The letter also said that the Tiranga Yatra should be treated as a project under the Indian Knowledge System (IKS) paper, and that students who attend would be given five marks for it. This paper, taught in the first semester with two credits, is one of the Value Added Courses. How many colleges actually teach it is another matter altogether — the main reason being the shortage of teachers.

The implication is clear: for the project students are supposed to do under the IKS paper, merely attending this march would suffice — no actual project work required! Just walk holding the tricolour, and the five marks are guaranteed! Surely, this will make the student a Vishwaguru (world teacher)! What value exactly is being “added” to a student by skipping a project and walking with a flag — only the Vice-Chancellor knows.

Look at the wording of the letter:

1. In the very first line, it says: “As per the orders of the Vice-Chancellor.” That is, sending students to the Tiranga Yatra is a direct order from the Vice-Chancellor to college principals and postgraduate department heads.

2. In the fifth line, it says: “Request as per this order.” So, the Vice-Chancellor both orders and requests! Remarkable, isn’t it?

3. In the sixth line of this seven-line letter, it says that once the march is over, “a humble request” is made to take attendance of the students. Here, the request has suddenly become “humble” instead of an order!

Whose programme is the Tiranga Yatra anyway? The Government of India’s, the Government of Gujarat’s, or the BJP’s? Whichever of the three it may be, can any Vice-Chancellor dare to say the university has nothing to do with it? What has happened in Gujarat University has surely happened in every other state-run university as well.

And yes — students are being enticed with five marks. A lure to be offered by the principal of each college. Students are not to come inspired by patriotism; they are to come tempted by marks! So the Vice-Chancellor already knows how patriotic students are — they’ll wave the tricolour only if bribed with marks.

The truth is likely that the office of the State Government’s Higher Education Commissioner in Gandhinagar has ordered all universities to hold a Tiranga Yatra.

Is there any principal with a “56-inch chest” who will dare to defy such an order or “request”? This is the latest example of how the BJP government has turned education into a mockery. These so-called protectors of Hindu culture are setting out to make India a Vishwaguru through Vice-Chancellors who obey every government directive, and principals and postgraduate department heads who follow orders without question.

I studied at Gujarat University for four years: from 1977–79 when I did my M.A. in Economics, and again from 1990–92 when I did my M.A. in Political Science. In those days, there were no Tiranga Yatras in universities, and proper teaching and learning took place. That must mean all the teachers and students of that time, including me, were traitors! What a farce now passes in the name of education!

---

*Senior economist based in Ahmedabad

Comments

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

The Epstein shock, global power games and India’s foreign policy dilemma

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The “Epstein” tsunami has jolted establishments everywhere. Politicians, bureaucrats, billionaires, celebrities, intellectuals, academics, religious gurus, and preachers—all appear to be under scrutiny, even dismantled. At first glance, it may seem like a story cutting across left, right, centre, Democrats, Republicans, socialists, capitalists—every label one can think of. Much of it, of course, is gossip, as people seek solace in the possible inclusion of names they personally dislike.

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup* Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog