Gujarat Information Commission orders strict compliance on CCTV footage preservation

By A Representative

In a significant ruling aimed at strengthening transparency and accountability, the Gujarat State Information Commission has issued strict directions to the Police Department regarding the preservation and sharing of CCTV footage under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Commission has made it clear that destruction of requested CCTV footage will lead to disciplinary action and penalties against responsible officials.

The Commission emphasized that if an RTI application is filed within 30 days of an incident, the concerned CCTV footage must be preserved until the disposal of the second appeal. The order refers to a circular issued by the General Administration Department (GAD) dated 6 May 2022 (No. GAD/102022/136/RTI Cell), which mandates this requirement. It also noted that the Director General of Police (DGP) has already issued relevant instructions for its implementation.

The issue was brought into focus by a citizen from Ahmedabad who filed an RTI application seeking CCTV footage from ShaherKotda Police Station to obtain evidence of alleged police misconduct. When he failed to receive the footage, he approached the Commission directly. During the hearing, the police claimed the footage had been deleted due to a technical fault, a justification the Commission rejected as improper.

Highlighting the frequent denial of CCTV footage by police stations, the Commission observed that many citizens rely on such evidence to support claims of mistreatment or to present in legal cases. Denying access to such footage undermines the purpose of installing surveillance cameras in police stations, it stated.

In its order dated 19 July 2025, the Commission warned that Public Information Officers (PIOs) and First Appellate Authorities (FAAs) who fail to provide requested CCTV footage would face penalties and disciplinary action under Section 20 of the RTI Act. It also invoked the Gujarat Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1971, for further action in cases of non-compliance.

The Commission directed the DGP and all Commissionerates and Superintendents of Police across Gujarat to re-circulate the earlier GAD instructions and ensure that all police personnel are made aware of the mandatory preservation and disclosure of CCTV footage in response to RTI applications.

Rani Laxmi Bai, Tatya Tope 'martyred' by East India Company, Scindia's forefathers

Jiyaji Rao Scindia By A Representative In an email alert to Counterview, well-known political scientist Shamsul Islam has said that was “shameful for any political party in democratic India to keep children of Sindhias in their flock” given their role during the First War of Indian Independence (1857). In a direct commentary on Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia moving over to BJP, Prof Islam has quote from a British gazetteer to prove his point.

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Counterview

Search This Blog