Skip to main content

Trump’s tariff hike and the question of Indian farmers: Why PM's assurances aren't enough

By Prof. Hemantkumar Shah* 
When U.S. President Donald Trump recently imposed a steep 50% tariff on imports from India starting August, Prime Minister Narendra Modi assured that Indian farmers’ interests would not be compromised. The External Affairs Minister too echoed the same concern. Such assurances are welcome, but the real question remains: how much will Indian farmers actually be affected by Trump’s tariff, and which groups of farmers are at risk?
Tariffs raise the prices of Indian goods in the U.S., which can make them less competitive, leading to a fall in exports. If exports decline, producers in India—farmers among them—face shrinking demand, reduced production, and falling incomes. This, in turn, could impact jobs and GDP growth. Yet, when we examine the data, it becomes evident that the scale of the problem for farmers is far smaller than political rhetoric might suggest.
India’s exports to the U.S. in 2024 were worth $7.75 billion. Out of this, agricultural exports were only $621 million, which is just 8%. Moreover, agricultural exports to the U.S. have already been falling for reasons unrelated to tariffs: $666 million in 2022 dropped to $581 million in 2023, before Trump’s latest move. Clearly, declining agricultural exports to the U.S. are not new, and Indian farmers have not been shielded in the past.
Among India’s farm exports to the U.S., marine products account for the largest share—$248 million in 2024. These come from fishermen and seafood processors rather than crop farmers. After this, spices (especially from Kerala), rice, processed foods, bakery items, edible oils, sugar, and tea follow in much smaller quantities. Given India’s 146 million farmers, perhaps fewer than one million are directly tied to these exports. In fact, marine products dominate, and their production has already seen declining demand in recent years. Thus, while some sections of farmers—particularly spice growers in Kerala—may be hurt, the majority will remain unaffected.
The real concern is that while the government expresses worry about farmers, it must act decisively rather than merely offering reassurances. This could mean helping exporters find new markets, offering targeted subsidies for inputs like fertilizer, electricity, and water, or direct cash support to affected farmers. Without such measures, small segments of farmers and the laborers dependent on them may suffer.
On the other side, India imports agricultural products from the U.S., though in much smaller amounts. In 2024, India imported $238 million worth, mainly almonds, ethanol, soybean oil, and cotton. If India agrees to U.S. pressure to lower tariffs, these imports will become cheaper and increase in volume. That may harm Indian producers of similar goods, as cheaper American products flood the domestic market. Almond growers, for instance, could face direct competition.
Taking all these factors together, the impact of Trump’s tariff hike on Indian farmers is likely to be limited, affecting only a small minority. Much of what is exported is not raw farm produce but processed goods from factories, meaning that industrial workers and processors may also feel the pinch. Therefore, while the Prime Minister is right to reassure farmers, the broader reality is that the tariff dispute is more about trade negotiations than about mass agricultural distress in India.
---
*Senior economist based in Ahmedabad

Comments

  1. Sell to EU, Asia, Africa, S America…lower risk of US market

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Rani Laxmi Bai, Tatya Tope 'martyred' by East India Company, Scindia's forefathers

Jiyaji Rao Scindia By  A  Representative In an email alert to Counterview, well-known political scientist Shamsul Islam has said that was “shameful for any political party in democratic India to keep children of Sindhias in their flock” given their role during the First War of Indian Independence (1857). In a direct commentary on Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia moving over to BJP, Prof Islam has quote from a British gazetteer to prove his point.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”