Skip to main content

Tariffs, subsidies and double standards: How the US hurts India

By Bharat Dogra 
The tariff policies of the Trump administration have been marked by arbitrariness and unfairness. Nowhere is this more evident than in its treatment of countries such as India and Brazil. The calculations behind the tariffs imposed are devoid of scientific basis or economic logic. In fact, in the case of India and Brazil, the reasoning borders on the bizarre.
India has been singled out for purchasing Russian oil—an unjustified intrusion into the trade sovereignty and economic decision-making of a friendly nation. This move has been further linked, absurdly, to the prolongation of the Ukraine war. Yet, if we look closely at the long history of US involvement in Ukraine—from 2014 to 2025—it is clear that American policies have been among the biggest contributors to the continuation and escalation of the conflict, often at the cost of sacrificing more and more Ukrainian lives in the pursuit of weakening Russia.
The double standards of the US position are exposed by data reported in The Times of India (August 7, 2025). A Finland-based think tank noted: “European Union countries account for 23% of Russia’s revenues from fossil fuel exports against India’s 13% since the beginning of the Ukraine conflict, while G7+ tankers are currently transporting more than half of those barrels.” Clearly, if oil purchases are to be condemned, the US should first look at its own allies.
The distortion in US trade discourse extends beyond energy to food and agriculture. It consistently disregards the vital concerns of Global South nations, which must prioritize food security, sovereignty, and farmers’ livelihoods. Unlike the US, where agriculture sustains only a small share of the population, in India the livelihoods of a majority remain tied to farming and allied activities. For the poor to access food, the government must procure at remunerative prices from farmers and distribute it at affordable rates.
Global agricultural prices are already skewed because rich countries, especially the US and EU, provide massive subsidies to their farmers and agribusinesses. These subsidies allow them to export at artificially low prices, devastating small producers in developing nations. What President Trump demands—breaking open Global South markets and slashing tariffs—is tantamount to asking these countries to jeopardize their food security and rural livelihoods for the sake of US agribusiness interests. To surrender meekly to such demands would be a betrayal of the sacrifices made during national freedom struggles.
Trump portrays the US as the aggrieved party, but in reality it is countries like India that have suffered from the harmful practices of US and Western agribusiness. Companies now facing lawsuits in America for health hazards caused by their technologies are simultaneously pushing to expand aggressively in India.
The unfairness of the global trade system has long been documented. The UNDP’s Human Development Report on international trade highlighted the highly regressive nature of agricultural subsidies in rich nations: “Rich countries spend over $1 billion a year as aid to developing country agriculture and just under $1 billion a day supporting their own agricultural systems.” These subsidies distort markets, destroy livelihoods in the Global South, and disproportionately benefit large agribusinesses in the North.
Examples abound. US cotton farmers once received subsidies equal to the market value of their crop, enabling them to dominate world markets while increasing poverty in African nations like Benin from 37% to 59%. Similarly, American rice grown at $415 per tonne was exported at $274 per tonne, wiping out rice farmers in Ghana and Haiti. In the European Union, sugar was sold at four times the world market price, creating a massive surplus that was dumped—again with subsidies—onto developing country markets, crippling local farmers and small processors.
Oxfam’s study Rigged Rules and Double Standards showed that the US and EU routinely exported farm products at prices over one-third below production costs, devastating farming communities across the Global South. This is the true face of “free trade”—but it is conveniently ignored in Washington’s rhetoric.
The Trump administration seems to believe that by shouting loudly and threatening others, it can turn falsehood into fact. But the reality is starkly different: the global trade system is rigged in favor of the wealthy, and tariff hikes against India are yet another expression of this inequity. India and other developing nations must remain firm in defending their food security, farmers’ livelihoods, and economic sovereignty against these arbitrary demands.
---
Bharat Dogra is Honorary Convener of the Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include A Day in 2071, Planet in Peril, Protecting Earth for Children, and Man Over Machine

Comments

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative   The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.