Skip to main content

Tariffs, subsidies and double standards: How the US hurts India

By Bharat Dogra 
The tariff policies of the Trump administration have been marked by arbitrariness and unfairness. Nowhere is this more evident than in its treatment of countries such as India and Brazil. The calculations behind the tariffs imposed are devoid of scientific basis or economic logic. In fact, in the case of India and Brazil, the reasoning borders on the bizarre.
India has been singled out for purchasing Russian oil—an unjustified intrusion into the trade sovereignty and economic decision-making of a friendly nation. This move has been further linked, absurdly, to the prolongation of the Ukraine war. Yet, if we look closely at the long history of US involvement in Ukraine—from 2014 to 2025—it is clear that American policies have been among the biggest contributors to the continuation and escalation of the conflict, often at the cost of sacrificing more and more Ukrainian lives in the pursuit of weakening Russia.
The double standards of the US position are exposed by data reported in The Times of India (August 7, 2025). A Finland-based think tank noted: “European Union countries account for 23% of Russia’s revenues from fossil fuel exports against India’s 13% since the beginning of the Ukraine conflict, while G7+ tankers are currently transporting more than half of those barrels.” Clearly, if oil purchases are to be condemned, the US should first look at its own allies.
The distortion in US trade discourse extends beyond energy to food and agriculture. It consistently disregards the vital concerns of Global South nations, which must prioritize food security, sovereignty, and farmers’ livelihoods. Unlike the US, where agriculture sustains only a small share of the population, in India the livelihoods of a majority remain tied to farming and allied activities. For the poor to access food, the government must procure at remunerative prices from farmers and distribute it at affordable rates.
Global agricultural prices are already skewed because rich countries, especially the US and EU, provide massive subsidies to their farmers and agribusinesses. These subsidies allow them to export at artificially low prices, devastating small producers in developing nations. What President Trump demands—breaking open Global South markets and slashing tariffs—is tantamount to asking these countries to jeopardize their food security and rural livelihoods for the sake of US agribusiness interests. To surrender meekly to such demands would be a betrayal of the sacrifices made during national freedom struggles.
Trump portrays the US as the aggrieved party, but in reality it is countries like India that have suffered from the harmful practices of US and Western agribusiness. Companies now facing lawsuits in America for health hazards caused by their technologies are simultaneously pushing to expand aggressively in India.
The unfairness of the global trade system has long been documented. The UNDP’s Human Development Report on international trade highlighted the highly regressive nature of agricultural subsidies in rich nations: “Rich countries spend over $1 billion a year as aid to developing country agriculture and just under $1 billion a day supporting their own agricultural systems.” These subsidies distort markets, destroy livelihoods in the Global South, and disproportionately benefit large agribusinesses in the North.
Examples abound. US cotton farmers once received subsidies equal to the market value of their crop, enabling them to dominate world markets while increasing poverty in African nations like Benin from 37% to 59%. Similarly, American rice grown at $415 per tonne was exported at $274 per tonne, wiping out rice farmers in Ghana and Haiti. In the European Union, sugar was sold at four times the world market price, creating a massive surplus that was dumped—again with subsidies—onto developing country markets, crippling local farmers and small processors.
Oxfam’s study Rigged Rules and Double Standards showed that the US and EU routinely exported farm products at prices over one-third below production costs, devastating farming communities across the Global South. This is the true face of “free trade”—but it is conveniently ignored in Washington’s rhetoric.
The Trump administration seems to believe that by shouting loudly and threatening others, it can turn falsehood into fact. But the reality is starkly different: the global trade system is rigged in favor of the wealthy, and tariff hikes against India are yet another expression of this inequity. India and other developing nations must remain firm in defending their food security, farmers’ livelihoods, and economic sovereignty against these arbitrary demands.
---
Bharat Dogra is Honorary Convener of the Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include A Day in 2071, Planet in Peril, Protecting Earth for Children, and Man Over Machine

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra   Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.