Skip to main content

Dr Nigel Walton: A free spirit who lived without apologies

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
It is difficult to speak of Dr Nigel Walton in the past tense, and even harder to write the obituary of a friend like him. More than a decade of friendship and fun was cut short by his unexpected passing, yet death could not extinguish the bonds he forged with so many over the years. He touched countless lives in unique and meaningful ways.
I met Nigel during my time in Coventry. His dry, often cold humour became the foundation of a friendship strengthened by our shared social and academic commitments to reading and writing. His banter was often politically incorrect, yet never intended to belittle others—always softened by self-deprecating wit. He held an MBA from the Open University and a PhD from Coventry University, but he dismissed these qualifications as “merely A4-sized expensive papers to inflate my ego in a supermarket called universities.” He never took himself too seriously as a scholar, though he published numerous articles, book chapters, and four books.
As a researcher, Nigel examined the disempowering impacts of AI-driven digitalisation and technology. Between 2013 and 2023, he produced more than thirty-nine articles and policy papers for Oxford Analytica, arguing that technological innovation should empower people and strengthen small businesses. He was an early voice warning about the rise of techno-authoritarianism, envisioning a form of digital colonialism where platform companies acted as crowns, AI firms as nobility, and traditional businesses as vassals in a new feudal order. His social and political commitments extended to advocating for gender-sensitive AI to promote women’s entrepreneurial leadership.
In the classroom, Nigel’s teaching was infused with humour, warmth, and a democratic spirit. He rejected hierarchy, managerialism, and rigid marking systems, believing education should be egalitarian. Students cherished his mentorship, his respect for their ideas, and his passion for creating a rich learning experience. His research directly informed his teaching on topics ranging from corporate strategy to artificial intelligence. As a PhD supervisor, he engaged deeply with his students’ work, treating their projects with the same care as his own.
Before academia, Nigel spent a decade as a senior manager at a US multinational and another as a strategic consultant for major corporations and government departments. These experiences shaped his scepticism of capitalism. He was not a Marxist, but once compared capitalist society to “a strip club” that commodifies bodies and strips away human dignity. Beneath his serious exterior, he carried a rich vein of humour, which he described as part of “the tight-lipped English culture to hide the emptiness within”—before adding that he was “not wicked like the racist English ruling class conservatives.” He believed deeply in human freedom, equality, and dignity.
Nigel’s career took him to several universities, including Worcester, Coventry, UCA, the Open University, the University of Southern Denmark, Politecnico di Milano, Cranfield, and Aston. His last role was Senior Lecturer in Strategy and Innovation at the University of Portsmouth, where he was valued for his research and teaching. He was on track for promotion to Associate Professor, which he joked would simply allow him to “buy more nuts while drinking in pubs in Portsmouth.”
His sudden death cut short not just his academic plans but his joy for life. He called his friends “fun-loving decadent twats” and delighted in conversations that challenged conventional thinking. He was radically liberal, refusing to be boxed into ideological lanes. He despised dogma in any form, and his atheism was often expressed through playful irreverence. “God created wine,” he once said, “so that men and women could enjoy without any inhibitions.”
Nigel loved women, wine, books, and running. He would not have wanted his friends to mourn. He would have said, “Join me for some more sin,” meaning the joy of living. I do not know whether he consumed life or life consumed him, but I have lost a great friend and co-author who constantly reminded me to write in “simple and accessible words like a working-class boy.” I have promised to finish our unfinished research and to celebrate our friendship as he would have wished.
Nigel did not believe in reincarnation. “It is a way to control the present for an unseen future,” he told me. “Everyday enjoyment is real.” My friend, may you continue to enjoy life and death. All your friends celebrate you. I know you would hate this piece, but this is my way of dealing with your absence. Adieu, Nigel—and I will never forget that “fuck” was your favourite word for questioning every form of power.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.