Skip to main content

Islam is bigger than labels: Why's there need to embrace the Qur’an's inclusive spirit

By Mike Mohamed Ghouse*  
Farrukh Shaikh, a citizen who lives in  Dallas, has said, “This is a warning to all Muslims in this forum that Mike Ghouse’s religion is not Islam; he is Ismaili and a misguided person. If anyone needs more information about his religion, please let me know.”
Really? Aren’t Ismailis Muslims? So are Sunnis, Shi’as, Bohras, Ahmadis, Sufis, the WD Mohammed group, and many others. It is disheartening to see some Muslims diminish the universality of Islam. Islam is as vast as the sky, encompassing all of God’s creation. It is He who placed us in different tribes, communities, races, ethnicities, and nations, and I would even include other religions (49:13). Learning to respect and accept that uniqueness is equivalent to honoring the Creator’s choice. This is the message in the very first verse of the first surah, Al-Fatiha, in the very first verse of the last surah, An-Nas, and throughout the Qur’an, where God addresses mankind.
The great scholar Mohammed Asad highlights this idea in his Tafsir, particularly referencing verse 2:62. He states that anyone who believes in God, acknowledges accountability on the Day of Judgment, and cares for God’s creation is considered a Muslim—a submitter to God’s will. I have cited this in my article, “Who is a Muslim, and what is Islam?”
It is important to recognize that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) introduced a progressive way of life—Islam. He abolished cruel practices such as infanticide, proclaimed for the first time in civilizational history that women could own their own businesses and property, propose marriage, and even initiate divorce. He took the steps to abolish slavery and introduced many other progressive values, changing the culture significantly over the course of 23 years. If it is not common sense, then it is not Islam. This was a monumental change, and we should not forget it. Instead, we should continue to promote and advance this spirit of progressiveness.
I wish Farrukh Shaikh had written to me directly instead of circulating misinformation. He could have simply said, “Mike Ghouse is a Muslim, but I’m unsure which denomination he belongs to since I have not verified it. It appears that he belongs to all groups, including Shia, Sunni, Sufi, Bohra, Ahmadiyya, Ismaili, Alawite, and others.” That would have been fair.
Prophet Muhammad knew only one group of people: Muslims. Terms like Sunni, Shia, Ahmadiyya, Bohra, Sufi, Ismaili, WD Muhammad, Alawite, Deobandi, Barelvi, Ahl-e-Hadith, and Ahl-e-Bait did not exist in his time. Different groups or denominations are natural outcomes of societal development. The Prophet understood human nature and even predicted that the singular faith he taught would eventually divide into many strands. He used the metaphorical number seventy-two to symbolize the infinite number of splits that could occur.
His message, however, was one of coexistence and humility. He taught us to live with our differences, to race in doing good, but to avoid arrogance and self-righteousness, which God dislikes. Even a sinner may be forgiven by God for a simple act of kindness—such as giving water to a thirsty dog—especially when extended to fellow humans. Only God knows the full impact of our actions on His creation. Our responsibility is to strive to be good human beings who care for others and for the environment.
Wouldn’t you feel happy if your guests took meticulous care of your property before leaving? Or if your employees ensured your business was intact and well-maintained? Do you really worry whether that employee is Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, Christian, or Sikh as long as they fulfill their responsibility with honesty? Likewise, God does not concern Himself with labels; He appreciates our contributions to preserving His creation and restoring harmony through justice, fairness, and kindness.
My Hindu friends will recognize parallels in their own tradition: Brahma the creator, Vishnu the sustainer, and Shiva the recycler. God in Islam is no different—He sustains, restores, and nurtures His creation. The universal question He asks of us is simple: are you good to your fellow beings and to the environment?
The Qur’an is the word of God, but its meanings have been interpreted differently across times and traditions. No one, not even the greatest Imams, can claim their interpretation as the only one. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) did not appoint anyone as the sole interpreter of the Qur’an; he simply said, “I am leaving this book with you for your understanding, and you cannot go wrong if you follow it.” The Shia tradition views this differently, and we must respect their interpretation.
If God is kind and merciful, and if the Prophet is described as a mercy to humanity, then the teachings we find in the Qur’an are aimed at universal goodness and inclusivity. Islam is too expansive a religion to exclude anyone. Every faith has followed the natural path of divisions. Christianity branched into Catholicism, Protestantism, and hundreds of denominations. Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Sikhism have also splintered into many schools. Islam too began with one vision, one community, but it evolved into many traditions. The Prophet was aware of this inevitability.
As for me, I have chosen to remain denomination-less. If you hear me pray, it will sound like the Sunni tradition only because I was raised in that environment. If I had been born into a Shia or Ahmadi family, I would have prayed in that manner. It doesn’t make one superior or inferior. Each tradition is precious to the believer. As the saying goes, “Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder; faith is in the heart of the believer.” The Qur’an itself says: “To you is your faith, and to me is my faith.” (109:6).
I am comfortable with every tradition of Muslim prayer. I have visited mosques of almost all denominations, including the three most revered ones in Mecca, Madinah, and Jerusalem. The next place I intend to visit is Karbala, where Imam Hussain stood for justice at the cost of his entire family. Am I following the inclusive, progressive path of the Prophet? Yes, I am. Then why should I limit myself to a label? I am a Muslim, period. I have no walls between me and another Muslim, and no barriers between me and another human being.
The World Muslim Congress was formed with the express purpose of creating space for every Muslim, and the Center for Pluralism was created for all humanity. Over the years, we have conducted 780 hours of radio talk shows and 40 workshops covering traditions from Atheism to Zoroastrianism, and every faith in between. The purpose was to understand each other and reduce tensions. It took years of effort, but that remains my commitment: to create a world where all humanity can get along by knowing each other.
The role of Muslims is not to divide, but to contribute to the well-being of humanity, to nurture goodwill, and to become conflict mitigators. Our goal is to build a secure world where every human can live in peace and dignity. The World Muslim Congress focuses on Muslims’ civic responsibility, not in dividing them by denomination, but in affirming their common faith in God, the Prophet, and accountability. Whoever calls themselves a Muslim is a Muslim to us. And today, we are blessed to have Christians, Hindus, Jews, Baha’is, Sikhs, and Buddhists among us to share their perspectives.
God loves us all. After all, we are His creation, and because He cares about us, He sends guidance to every community—a messenger, a prophet, an avatar, or a peacemaker—to show them how to live in harmony. The Bhagavad Gita phrases it differently but similarly: every time there is chaos in society, someone will emerge to restore righteousness. The Qur’an also affirms that God sent prophets to every nation. The name doesn’t matter; the message is the same: to preserve harmony, peace, and justice.
Islam has always emphasized serving fellow beings. God assures us—not just Muslims—that if we take care of His creation, He will take care of us. That, to me, is the essence of being a Muslim.
---
*Progressive wedding officiant, encourages inter-faith marriage; heads Center for Pluralism, a Washington DC-based non-profit organisation. This is the abridged version of the original blog which appeared in the World Muslim Congress site

Comments

TRENDING

Plastic burning in homes threatens food, water and air across Global South: Study

By Jag Jivan  In a groundbreaking  study  spanning 26 countries across the Global South , researchers have uncovered the widespread and concerning practice of households burning plastic waste as a fuel for cooking, heating, and other domestic needs. The research, published in Nature Communications , reveals that this hazardous method of managing both waste and energy poverty is driven by systemic failures in municipal services and the unaffordability of clean alternatives, posing severe risks to human health and the environment.

Economic superpower’s social failure? Inequality, malnutrition and crisis of India's democracy

By Vikas Meshram  India may be celebrated as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but a closer look at who benefits from that growth tells a starkly different story. The recently released World Inequality Report 2026 lays bare a country sharply divided by wealth, privilege and power. According to the report, nearly 65 percent of India’s total wealth is owned by the richest 10 percent of its population, while the bottom half of the country controls barely 6.4 percent. The top one percent—around 14 million people—holds more than 40 percent, the highest concentration since 1961. Meanwhile, the female labour force participation rate is a dismal 15.7 percent.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

The greatest threat to our food system: The aggressive push for GM crops

By Bharat Dogra  Thanks to the courageous resistance of several leading scientists who continue to speak the truth despite increasing pressures from the powerful GM crop and GM food lobby , the many-sided and in some contexts irreversible environmental and health impacts of GM foods and crops, as well as the highly disruptive effects of this technology on farmers, are widely known today. 

History, culture and literature of Fatehpur, UP, from where Maulana Hasrat Mohani hailed

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Maulana Hasrat Mohani was a member of the Constituent Assembly and an extremely important leader of our freedom movement. Born in Unnao district of Uttar Pradesh, Hasrat Mohani's relationship with nearby district of Fatehpur is interesting and not explored much by biographers and historians. Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri has written a book on Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Fatehpur. The book is in Urdu.  He has just come out with another important book, 'Hindi kee Pratham Rachna: Chandayan' authored by Mulla Daud Dalmai.' During my recent visit to Fatehpur town, I had an opportunity to meet Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri and recorded a conversation with him on issues of history, culture and literature of Fatehpur. Sharing this conversation here with you. Kindly click this link. --- *Human rights defender. Facebook https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat , X @freetohumanity, Skype @vbrawat

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

From colonial mercantilism to Hindutva: New book on the making of power in Gujarat

By Rajiv Shah  Professor Ghanshyam Shah ’s latest book, “ Caste-Class Hegemony and State Power: A Study of Gujarat Politics ”, published by Routledge , is penned by one of Gujarat ’s most respected chroniclers, drawing on decades of fieldwork in the state. It seeks to dissect how caste and class factors overlap to perpetuate the hegemony of upper strata in an ostensibly democratic polity. The book probes the dominance of two main political parties in Gujarat—the Indian National Congress and the BJP—arguing that both have sustained capitalist growth while reinforcing Brahmanic hierarchies.

'Restructuring' Sahitya Akademi: Is the ‘Gujarat model’ reaching Delhi?

By Prakash N. Shah*  ​A fortnight and a few days have slipped past that grim event. It was as if the wedding preparations were complete and the groom’s face was about to be unveiled behind the ceremonial tinsel. At 3 PM on December 18, a press conference was poised to announce the Sahitya Akademi Awards . 

Would breaking idols, burning books annihilate caste? Recalling a 1972 Dalit protest

By Rajiv Shah  A few days ago, I received an email alert from a veteran human rights leader who has fought many battles in Gujarat for the Dalit cause — both through ground-level campaigns and courtroom struggles. The alert, sent in Gujarati by Valjibhai Patel, who heads the Council for Social Justice, stated: “In 1935, Babasaheb Ambedkar burnt the Manusmriti . In 1972, we broke the idol of Krishna , whom we regarded as the creator of the varna (caste) system.”