Skip to main content

West Bengal rights group raises concerns over India-Bangladesh border fencing

By A Representative
 
Human rights organization Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM) has expressed strong concern over the ongoing fencing work along the India–Bangladesh border, warning that it could displace millions of villagers and cut them off from their land.
The group’s statement came a day after Minister of State for Home Affairs Nityanand Rai told the Rajya Sabha that fencing was necessary to address infiltration issues along the border. MASUM described the minister’s remarks as “unrealistic and naïve,” pointing to a 2017 Parliamentary Standing Committee report that recommended urgent measures for residents of villages situated directly along the border.
According to MASUM, fencing in several areas has been constructed 5–6 kilometers inside Indian territory, effectively separating farmers from their agricultural land. The organization estimated that around 20–30 lakh people living in villages near the international border could be directly affected.
“When the question of fencing arises, it is not merely about land acquisition, but about the safety, security, dignity and rights of Indian citizens who live in these border villages,” said Kirity Roy, Secretary of MASUM. “If such lands are required in the national interest, the government must come forward with a clear and transparent proposal for compensation, rehabilitation and resettlement.”
The group noted that thousands of petitions submitted by affected villagers to district, state and central authorities, as well as to human rights institutions, have gone largely unanswered. MASUM also stressed that building fencing on fertile and cultivable lands amounts to an irreparable loss for farmers, warning that such policies are forcing people into distress migration.
The statement urged both the Government of India and the Government of West Bengal to address the concerns of border residents. “We strongly urge the authorities to think about those people who have elected you,” Roy said.

Comments

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

Gujarat police SOP sparks questions over communal profiling

By Shabnam Hashmi*  The Gujarat government must be held accountable for what appears to be a deeply disturbing instance of state-sponsored communal profiling. Ahmedabad resident Sahal Qureshi recently shared with me an official document , which I translated with the help of AI before forwarding it to several media organisations and political leaders. 

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.