Skip to main content

Why is India’s cheetah project under fire? Study flags ecological, social, species injustices

 
By Rajiv Shah 
A recent peer-reviewed study has sharply criticized Project Cheetah—India’s high-profile initiative to reintroduce African cheetahs into the wild—as ethically compromised, scientifically flawed, and socially unjust. Titled “Delineating the Environmental Justice Implications of an Experimental Cheetah Introduction Project in India”, the paper is authored by Yashendu C. Joshi, Stephanie E. Klarmann, and Louise C. de Waal, and was published in Frontiers in Conservation Science.
The authors argue that the cheetah translocation effort has not only failed to meet scientific standards but has also violated environmental justice principles—undermining both human and animal rights in the process.
The project has translocated 20 African cheetahs—eight from Namibia in 2022 and twelve from South Africa in 2023—to Kuno National Park (KNP) in Madhya Pradesh. While the stated aim is to restore India’s lost cheetah population (extinct since the 1950s), the project has been plagued by high mortality and stalled progress.
According to the study, “40.0% adult mortality and 29.4% cub mortality” have been recorded to date. “Currently, no cheetahs exist in KNP’s extensive wild systems,” the authors note, adding that the surviving cheetahs—12 adults and 12 cubs—remain in captivity within small, fenced enclosures called soft-release bomas (SRBs).
Despite this, the plan envisions a 30–40 year horizon with an annual import of 12 cheetahs from southern Africa to build a viable population—raising questions about the sustainability and ethics of the project. The authors criticize this as "knowingly subjecting animals to substantial stress, existential risks, and mortality."
Displacement Without Consent
The paper draws attention to the human cost of this conservation effort, particularly the displacement of 5,000 people from 24 villages between 1999 and 2001—originally for an Asiatic lion reintroduction plan that never materialized. The decision to repurpose KNP for African cheetahs ignored this social history and failed to engage with local communities meaningfully.
The authors write:
“This lack of community engagement can lead to disenfranchisement and exacerbate existing power imbalances… leading to unjust outcomes, such as ‘conservation refugees.’”
Even worse, site assessments used to justify relocations were based on visual markers of “economic well-being”—like clothing and watches—rather than any participatory process. The report quotes the original planning document’s disturbing rationale:
“The people residing in the forested areas outside KNP are poor and backward and a good compensation package… would be irresistible.”
The paper identifies this as a clear case of procedural and distributive injustice, where local people bore the brunt of conservation costs with little agency or recognition.
From an animal welfare standpoint, the study highlights severe concerns. African cheetahs, which require vast ranges (averaging 4.3 km/day and territories up to 5,441 km²), have been confined in 0.5–1.5 km² bomas. Many have been repeatedly tranquilized—“more than 90 chemical immobilizations,” as per the paper—and subjected to stressful veterinary interventions.
“We challenge conservationists to identify an ethically acceptable mortality rate for cheetah reintroductions and refrain from phrases like ‘successful reintroductions’ when 40%–50% of the animals die,” the authors state.
Unnatural Confinement 
The practice of releasing live prey into the enclosures for hunting has also been condemned as “unnatural confinement and exposure to immediate attack with no recourse”—a practice the South African judiciary has previously ruled unethical.
The report warns that such suffering amounts to “species injustice”, where a vulnerable species is used for experimental conservation without adequately considering its biological needs or survival chances.
The authors argue that the project violates all three pillars of environmental justice: distribution (who bears the costs and receives benefits), procedure (participation in decision-making), and recognition (respect for local knowledge and values).
“We argue that Project Cheetah exemplifies broader issues applicable to rewilding and restoration projects that necessitate attention,” the paper states, adding that “conservation strategies must be robust, scientifically grounded, and locally accepted.”
With an estimated budget of USD 50–60 million, the authors question whether this money would have been better spent on in-situ conservation or the upliftment of displaced communities. The paper also raises doubts about the political motivations behind the project, including alleged negotiations tied to ivory trade policy.
The study can be called a powerful indictment of conservation initiatives that sideline ethics, ignore local communities, and endanger animal welfare in the name of ecological restoration. As India continues to scale up its wildlife conservation programs, the authors call for “justice-informed and evidence-based decision-making” that respects both human dignity and species welfare.

Comments

TRENDING

Workers' groups condemn Gujarat Ordinance increasing working hours, warn of statewide agitation

By A Representative   At a consultation organised today by the Asangathit Shramik Hit Rakshak Manch at Circuit House in Ahmedabad, leaders of major trade unions and labour rights organisations strongly opposed the Gujarat government’s recent ordinance amending the Factories Act and the draft rules notified under the Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Code, 2020. Around 50 representatives from central trade unions, independent unions, and labour welfare organisations participated in the meeting.

The myth of population decline: India’s real challenge is density, not fertility

By N.S. Venkataraman*   India’s population in 2025 stands at approximately 1.4 billion. In 1950, it was 359 million, rising sharply to 1.05 billion by 2000. The population continues to grow and is projected to reach around 1.7 billion by 2050.

How natural and organic farming can be a key to combating the climate crisis

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  On July 9, while addressing the “Sahkar Samvad” in Ahmedabad with women and workers associated with cooperatives from Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan, Union Home Minister Amit Shah emphasized that natural farming is essential for both our health and the health of the soil. This is a significant statement in the context of addressing the climate change crisis. Natural farming can play a crucial role in combating climate change. Also known as organic farming, it is a system of agriculture that can increase food production without harming the environment. Natural farming has the potential to reduce carbon emissions by 35% to 50%.

The GMO illusion: Three decades of hype, harm, and false hope

By Sridhar Radhakrishnan  Three decades of hype, billions of dollars spent, and still no miracle crop. It's time to abandon the GMO biotech fairy tale and return to the soil, the seed, and the farmer. “Trust us,” they said. “GMOs will feed the world.” Picture a world where there is plenty of food, no hunger, fields grow without chemical pesticides, children are saved from malnutrition, and people live healthily.

Another 'honor' killing in Tamil Nadu: Caste pride has murdered love, again

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Once again, Tamil Nadu has witnessed a brutal so-called 'honor' killing. This time, it is Kevin Selvaganesh, a 27-year-old software engineer from the Scheduled Caste community, who has been hacked to death by the family of the girl he loved since childhood. Kevin, a brilliant student employed at Tata Consultancy Services, was in a relationship with Subashini, his schoolmate and girlfriend. The couple, both well-educated and professionally qualified, had plans to marry. Yet, that love story ended in bloodshed — sacrificed at the altar of caste pride.

Iran-Israel escalation: Shift in regional military dynamics, challenging the balance of power in Middle-East

By Raqif Makhdoomi   On a night that stunned many across the world, sirens blared across Israeli cities, warning of incoming missile strikes. Buildings were damaged, civilians rushed to bunkers, and flames lit up the skyline. This time, the threat did not originate from Gaza—but from Iran. The April 2025 Iranian missile attack on Israel marked a significant moment in the broader Middle East conflict, challenging long-held perceptions of military supremacy in the region.

From Kailasa to Lodonia: The business of inventing nations in India

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  This is the story of India—and the 'ideas' and 'imagination' that shape it. Some years ago, someone announced the creation of the 'United States of Kailasa,' a fictional nation 'founded' by Swami Nithyananda, who remains wanted in multiple criminal cases in India, including rape and murder. Remarkably, representatives of this fabricated country even managed to 'participate' in various United Nations events, including sessions of CEDAW in Geneva.

'Bengali Muslim migrant workers face crackdown in Gurgaon': Academic raises alarm

By A Representative   Political analyst and retired Delhi University professor Shamsul Islam has raised serious concerns over the ongoing targeting and detention of Muslim migrant workers from West Bengal in Gurgaon, Haryana. In a public statement, Islam described the situation as "brutal repression" and accused law enforcement agencies of detaining migrants arbitrarily under the pretext of verifying their citizenship.

Deaths in Chhattisgarh are not just numbers – they mark a deeper democratic crisis

By Sunil Kumar  For a while, I had withdrawn into a quieter life, seeking solace in nature. But the rising tide of state-sponsored violence and recurring conflict across India has compelled deeper reflection. The recent incidents of killings in central India—particularly in Chhattisgarh—are not isolated acts. They point to a larger and ongoing crisis that concerns the health of democracy and the treatment of marginalised communities.