Skip to main content

Advocacy group slams govt’s nuclear push, recalls Hiroshima-Nagasaki, Chernobyl, Fukushima disasters

By A Representative
 
Marking 80 years since the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the advocacy group Friends of the Earth India has issued a scathing public statement condemning the Indian government’s aggressive expansion of nuclear energy and proposed legal amendments that would allow private sector entry and dilute liability provisions. The group warned that such moves threaten to repeat “history’s gravest mistakes—not through war, but through irresponsible expansion of nuclear energy.”
The statement, dated August 9, titled “Remember Hiroshima–Nagasaki, Resist Nuclear Colonialism,” links the trauma of past nuclear disasters—from Hiroshima and Nagasaki to Chernobyl and Fukushima—with the risks posed by India’s current nuclear agenda. It criticizes the government’s plans to achieve 100 GW of nuclear power capacity by 2047 through Bharat small modular reactors, calling it a “false solution” that endangers lives, ecosystems, and future generations.
Friends of the Earth India expressed alarm over the Union Budget 2025–26 allocation of ₹24,661 crore to the Department of Atomic Energy, with ₹11,650 crore earmarked for new projects and SMRs. The group highlighted that proposed reactor sites in Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu are located in tribal and ecologically sensitive areas, often without public consultation or informed consent.
“The radioactive legacy of nuclear ambition is one the world still struggles to contain,” the statement reads, adding that nuclear energy’s ecological footprint is “severe,” with waste remaining hazardous for thousands of years and construction damaging forests, rivers, and coasts.
The group also criticized efforts to amend the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, and weaken the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010, arguing that these changes are designed to benefit corporate players, including foreign reactor suppliers who refuse to take responsibility for their technology. “Weakening liability provisions shields reactor suppliers from accountability, even if their technology is faulty or unsafe,” the statement asserts.
Calling nuclear energy “financially unviable,” Friends of the Earth India pointed to frequent delays, budget overruns, and high costs of waste management and decommissioning. “Yet the government continues to market nuclear energy as a ‘green,’ ‘safe,’ and ‘clean’ solution to the climate crisis—claims that collapse under scrutiny.”
The statement concludes with a call to action: “This is more than a policy dispute—it is a battle for our democracy, our communities, and our ecosystems. We must not let the memory of Hiroshima and Nagasaki fade, nor mortgage India’s future to radioactive danger.

Comments

TRENDING

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta*  India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine. 

Can cow dung become a source of income? Durga Maida shows the path to self‑reliance

By Vikas Meshram*  In the Sailana block of Ratlam district lies the small village of Govardhanpura. This is where Durga Maida lives with her husband and four daughters. Their livelihood depended on just one bigha of land—far too little to feed a family of six. Growing enough grain for the year was impossible, and even meeting daily expenses was a constant struggle. Alongside farming, Durga kept livestock and took up wage labour whenever she could. Hard work was never lacking, but income always was. Month after month, the accounts failed to balance, forcing her to borrow. Looking back, Durga says those days felt heavy and hopeless; farming offered no promise, and there was no sign of change. Her story mirrored the reality of almost every small farmer in the area.