Skip to main content

Israel’s conflicting strategy in Gaza undermines prospects for peace

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra* 
The Israeli and American operations targeting Iranian nuclear sites created diplomatic openings not only for a subsequent Iranian-Israeli ceasefire but also for negotiations regarding the future of Gaza. Progress in this direction might have been possible had the United States and Israel not hesitated in July this year. Both countries attributed the lack of progress to Hamas, citing insufficient coordination and bad faith.
For any negotiation process to succeed, it must engage with the demands of Hamas—still the de facto authority in Gaza—including guarantees from the United States for the withdrawal of Israeli forces, a permanent ceasefire, and sustained humanitarian aid through the UN and other agencies. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to pursue the goal of completely disarming Hamas and demands the exile of its leaders, even after the group has expressed willingness to release the remaining Israeli hostages.
Israel's confidence in its military capabilities, particularly in relation to Iran, appears to have discouraged meaningful diplomatic compromise on the Palestinian issue. This reluctance has historical roots. Following its military victory over Arab states in the 1967 war, Israel did not convert its strategic advantage into diplomatic engagement, which may have contributed to the outbreak of the Yom Kippur War in 1973.
Currently, Prime Minister Netanyahu appears confident that peace with Arab states can be achieved after the conflict in Gaza concludes, without directly addressing Palestinian concerns. Israel remains focused on the objective of neutralizing Hamas, continuing a military campaign that has led to widespread humanitarian consequences across Gaza, the West Bank, and other Palestinian territories. While advocating for the relocation of Gaza’s civilian population to designated humanitarian areas, Israeli authorities have yet to present a plan for post-conflict reconstruction or institutional restoration.
Israeli leaders view the conflict primarily through the lens of national security rather than humanitarian concerns, and seem prepared for a prolonged presence in both Gaza and the West Bank. There is a prevailing belief within Israeli leadership that tensions with Arab nations, heightened due to the military campaign in Gaza, are temporary and can be managed through economic and technological cooperation. Israel’s demonstrated military and technological strength is seen as a potential basis for renewed collaboration.
Despite widespread public concern in the Gulf region over the ongoing conflict, no Arab country—aside from Saudi Arabia—has taken decisive action on the issue of Palestinian statehood. None have withdrawn from the Abraham Accords or existing security arrangements with Israel. From Israel’s perspective, its role in reducing Iran’s missile and nuclear threats enhances its status as a stabilizing force. However, regional developments suggest otherwise. The Iranian response to Israeli and U.S. actions, including an attack on a U.S. base in Qatar, underscores rising tensions. Israeli airstrikes in southern Syria, justified as protection for minority groups, have been perceived by Syrian authorities as contributing to regional instability.
Public sentiment in several parts of the Gulf has shifted in response to the humanitarian toll of the conflict in Gaza. Israel’s confrontations with a broad spectrum of actors—including Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthi movement, Iran, Syrian factions, and Turkey—complicate prospects for peace. A sustainable resolution will likely depend on a shift toward diplomatic engagement, including a comprehensive approach to the political future of Gaza and the broader question of Palestinian statehood.
---
 *Senior Lecturer in Political Science, SVM Autonomous College, Jagatsinghpur, Odisha

Comments

TRENDING

'Violation of Apex Court order': Delhi authorities blamed for dog-bite incidents at JLN Stadium

By A Representative   People for Animals (PFA), led by Ms. Ambika Shukla, has held the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) responsible for the recent dog-bite incidents at Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, accusing it of violating Supreme Court directions regarding community dogs. The organisation’s on-ground fact-finding mission met stadium authorities and the two affected coaches to verify details surrounding the incidents, both of which occurred on October 3.

A revdi-funded dream? Tax breaks, hype, unease: PwC reveals GIFT City’s fragile foundations

By Rajiv Shah   Backed by generous subsidies (or so-called "revdis") channeled to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s flagship project, Gujarat International Finance Tec-City, or GIFT City, a recent PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) report claims it is “uniquely positioned to connect India to international markets and foster next-generation FinTech and IT innovation.” 

Bihar’s land at ₹1 per acre for Adani sparks outrage, NAPM calls it crony capitalism

By A Representative   The National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has strongly condemned the Bihar government’s decision to lease 1,050 acres of land in Pirpainti, Bhagalpur district, to Adani Power for a 2,400 MW coal-based thermal power project. 

‘I Love Muhammad’ and the new pretexts for communal violence in India

By Ram Puniyani   Communal violence is a curse in Indian politics. It has been around for over a century. Most scholars of this phenomenon believe that it is usually orchestrated deliberately. After such violence, conditions for communal polarization arise. Scholars also argue that “the religious polarization resulting from riots benefits political parties that engage in identity-based politics, while harming the Congress.” 

Adani Power controversy, legacy of pollution and broken dreams in Bihar

By Kumar Krishnan*  The decision to lease 1,050 acres of land in the Pirpainty region of Bhagalpur district to Adani Power for 33 years at a mere ₹1 per acre annual rent has become a major political issue in Bihar. Congress President Rajesh Ram, Bihar in-charge Krishna Allavaru, Legislature Party Leader Dr. Shakeel Ahmad Khan, and Legislative Council Leader Dr. Madan Mohan Jha have already marched from Sadakat Ashram to Rajendra Babu's samadhi in Patna over this issue. Pawan Khera and Kanhaiya Kumar are vocally opposing it. Additionally, allied parties of the Mahagathbandhan (Grand Alliance) are also protesting. The Congress party even held a march in Patna on this matter.

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

Destruction of nature leads to increase in natural disasters: A central tenet of Gandhi's philosophy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  Limited consumption of nature was a central tenet of Mahatma Gandhi's philosophy. He believed that humans should take only what they need from nature, avoiding greed or over-consumption. Therefore, resources must be used sparingly, justly, and with the welfare of others in mind. Gandhi connected lifestyle to simplicity and self-restraint. He warned against unbridled industrialization and dependence on machines. He argued that the Western style of consumption-centric development was fatal for a country like India, as it harms both nature and society. Gandhi was a proponent of 'Swadeshi' (self-sufficiency/local goods) and 'Gram Swaraj' (village self-rule). This approach ensures that the sustainable use of local resources is safe for both the environment and society.

Patriarchy and male image of God: Sociological reading of Narendra Pundarik's poetry

By Prof. Ravi Ranjan*  While reading Narendra Pundarik’s poem “Īśvara Kucch Kare Na Kare” from the collection In Hāthoṁ Ke Binā (Without These Hands), the first aspect that draws attention is the historical-sociological observation highlighted by the poet: in most religions across the world, the concept of an almighty God has traditionally been imagined in male form: > Women always assume That what lies beyond their control Is within God’s domain, And so, in their imagination, God is a man. (p. 111)