Skip to main content

Israel’s conflicting strategy in Gaza undermines prospects for peace

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra* 
The Israeli and American operations targeting Iranian nuclear sites created diplomatic openings not only for a subsequent Iranian-Israeli ceasefire but also for negotiations regarding the future of Gaza. Progress in this direction might have been possible had the United States and Israel not hesitated in July this year. Both countries attributed the lack of progress to Hamas, citing insufficient coordination and bad faith.
For any negotiation process to succeed, it must engage with the demands of Hamas—still the de facto authority in Gaza—including guarantees from the United States for the withdrawal of Israeli forces, a permanent ceasefire, and sustained humanitarian aid through the UN and other agencies. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to pursue the goal of completely disarming Hamas and demands the exile of its leaders, even after the group has expressed willingness to release the remaining Israeli hostages.
Israel's confidence in its military capabilities, particularly in relation to Iran, appears to have discouraged meaningful diplomatic compromise on the Palestinian issue. This reluctance has historical roots. Following its military victory over Arab states in the 1967 war, Israel did not convert its strategic advantage into diplomatic engagement, which may have contributed to the outbreak of the Yom Kippur War in 1973.
Currently, Prime Minister Netanyahu appears confident that peace with Arab states can be achieved after the conflict in Gaza concludes, without directly addressing Palestinian concerns. Israel remains focused on the objective of neutralizing Hamas, continuing a military campaign that has led to widespread humanitarian consequences across Gaza, the West Bank, and other Palestinian territories. While advocating for the relocation of Gaza’s civilian population to designated humanitarian areas, Israeli authorities have yet to present a plan for post-conflict reconstruction or institutional restoration.
Israeli leaders view the conflict primarily through the lens of national security rather than humanitarian concerns, and seem prepared for a prolonged presence in both Gaza and the West Bank. There is a prevailing belief within Israeli leadership that tensions with Arab nations, heightened due to the military campaign in Gaza, are temporary and can be managed through economic and technological cooperation. Israel’s demonstrated military and technological strength is seen as a potential basis for renewed collaboration.
Despite widespread public concern in the Gulf region over the ongoing conflict, no Arab country—aside from Saudi Arabia—has taken decisive action on the issue of Palestinian statehood. None have withdrawn from the Abraham Accords or existing security arrangements with Israel. From Israel’s perspective, its role in reducing Iran’s missile and nuclear threats enhances its status as a stabilizing force. However, regional developments suggest otherwise. The Iranian response to Israeli and U.S. actions, including an attack on a U.S. base in Qatar, underscores rising tensions. Israeli airstrikes in southern Syria, justified as protection for minority groups, have been perceived by Syrian authorities as contributing to regional instability.
Public sentiment in several parts of the Gulf has shifted in response to the humanitarian toll of the conflict in Gaza. Israel’s confrontations with a broad spectrum of actors—including Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthi movement, Iran, Syrian factions, and Turkey—complicate prospects for peace. A sustainable resolution will likely depend on a shift toward diplomatic engagement, including a comprehensive approach to the political future of Gaza and the broader question of Palestinian statehood.
---
 *Senior Lecturer in Political Science, SVM Autonomous College, Jagatsinghpur, Odisha

Comments

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Beneath the stone: Revisiting the New Jersey mandir controversy

By Rajiv Shah  A recent report published in the British media outlet The Guardian , titled “Workers carved the largest modern Hindu temple in the west. Now, some have incurable lung disease,” took me back to my visits to the New Jersey mandir —first in 2022, when it was still under construction, though parts of it were open to visitors, and again in 2024, after its completion.

Civil society flags widespread violations of land acquisition Act before Parliamentary panel

By Jag Jivan   Civil society organisations and stakeholders from across India have presented stark evidence before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj , alleging systemic violations of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (RFCTLARR) Act, 2013 , particularly in Scheduled Areas and tribal regions.

Ecologist Dr. S. Faizi urges UN intervention to save 35 million Gulf migrants

By A Representative   Renowned ecologist and veteran United Nations negotiator Dr. S. Faizi has issued an urgent appeal to UN Secretary-General AntĂłnio Guterres, calling for immediate diplomatic intervention to halt escalating conflict in the Persian Gulf. In a formal letter copied to several UN missions, Faizi warned that the lives and livelihoods of 35 million migrant workers—who comprise the vast majority of the population in many Gulf cities—are facing an unprecedented existential crisis.