Is British PM Starmer redefining labour, abandoning its values?

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*

The Labour Party and its leader, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, are highly unpopular, much like the previous PM, Rishi Sunak, and his Conservative Party. The latest YouGov poll result, released on October 8, 2024, reveals that more than six out of ten people in Britain dislike Starmer as Prime Minister, with 63% holding a negative opinion of him. Starmer and his leadership are now more unpopular than both Rishi Sunak and Nigel Farage. Such an ignominious fall is no accident but rather a result of Starmer's own making. His political positions are indistinguishable from those of other reactionary, right-wing, and conservative political leaders in the UK and across Europe. His leadership manifesto, electoral promises, and actions as Prime Minister suggest that Starmer is suffering from multiple personality disorder in politics. Starmer often says one thing and does exactly the opposite. No amount of political or ideological intervention will change the course of the Labour Party under his leadership, as he remains committed to his donors—his corporate masters.

The Labour Party government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Keir Starmer, has imposed austerity measures by cutting welfare budgets, including reductions to child benefits, winter fuel allowances for the elderly, and other welfare supports for vulnerable populations. However, while implementing these cuts, Starmer, as Prime Minister, enjoys personal gifts and support worth more than £100,000. Such entitlements for a PM are incompatible with the realities faced by the vast majority of citizens in Britain. While Starmer enjoys privileges beyond his means, the country grapples with increasing food bank use, rising unemployment, and escalating child poverty—threatening the basic rights of citizenship. This disparity reflects Starmer's lack of a moral and political compass to lead the country. Under his leadership, the Labour Party has also been significantly weakened due to his corporate-driven politics, which stand in stark contrast to the traditional labour values of working-class politics.

Working-class politics is rooted in a moral framework shaped by everyday life—stemming from and founded on principles of work, cooperation, solidarity, equality, justice, liberty, peace, prosperity, and the collective happiness of people, regardless of their backgrounds. These ideals form the foundation of internationalism, which is grounded in local working-class cultures and shapes the values of local, regional, national, and international politics through solidarity and cooperation. The working people of Britain have a long history of fighting against British feudalism, colonialism, imperialism, fascism, Zionism, and apartheid regimes, extending their solidarities beyond borders in the pursuit of justice, equality, liberty and fraternity while deepening democracy at home.

Labour Party government has imposed austerity measures by cutting welfare budgets for vulnerable populations

Such ideals and values have no place in the Labour Party under the leadership of Starmer, whose politics, "unburdened by doctrine," is far from value-free. In reality, he has betrayed and abandoned the working-class values and principles of labour in pursuit of corporate interests aligned with the demands of capitalism, all under the guise of promoting economic growth. Starmer’s politically untenable positions on NATO, nuclear weapons, the Ukraine-Russia conflict, and the genocide in Gaza reflect his continued embrace and celebration of colonial, imperialist, and Zionist doctrines, all under the guise of politics and governance "unburdened by doctrine." Mr Starmer as a labour PM and current Labour Party is without any form of labour values. These further underscores the disconnect between his leadership and the working-class values of justice, equality, and solidarity that once defined the Labour Party. This political and ideological hypocrisy from a Labour leader breeds reactionary politics both in Britain and abroad.

There is nothing progressive about the Labour Party under Starmer’s leadership today. Labour leaders, such as Canterbury MP Rosie Duffield, have quit the Labour Party and exposed the hypocrisies of Starmer and his government’s "cruel and unnecessary" policies against working people. While resigning from the Labour Party is a significant political act, it is not enough to create alternative politics to revive Labour values and uphold the interests of the working class. It is time for working people in Britain to save and reclaim their values and fight for their citizenship rights by rejecting the politics and ideology of leaders like Starmer. The survival of life and deepening of democracy in Britain depends on the struggle of working people, as this is the only viable alternative to celebrate working class values in politics.

—

*Scholar based in UK

Comments

How natural and organic farming can be a key to combating the climate crisis

By Raj Kumar Sinha* On July 9, while addressing the “Sahkar Samvad” in Ahmedabad with women and workers associated with cooperatives from Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan, Union Home Minister Amit Shah emphasized that natural farming is essential for both our health and the health of the soil. This is a significant statement in the context of addressing the climate change crisis. Natural farming can play a crucial role in combating climate change. Also known as organic farming, it is a system of agriculture that can increase food production without harming the environment. Natural farming has the potential to reduce carbon emissions by 35% to 50%.

100 yrs of RSS as seen by global media house: Power, controversy, push for Hindu-first India

By Rajiv Shah On a blistering summer evening in Nagpur, nearly a thousand men in brown trousers, white shirts, and black caps stood in formation as a saffron flag was raised, marking a graduation ceremony for Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) workers. This vivid scene, described in a recent FT Weekend Magazine article, “A hundred years after it was founded, India's Hindu-nationalist movement is getting closer to its goal of a Hindu-first state,” captures the enduring presence of the RSS, a century-old Hindu-nationalist organization.

Another 'honor' killing in Tamil Nadu: Caste pride has murdered love, again

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* Once again, Tamil Nadu has witnessed a brutal so-called 'honor' killing. This time, it is Kevin Selvaganesh, a 27-year-old software engineer from the Scheduled Caste community, who has been hacked to death by the family of the girl he loved since childhood. Kevin, a brilliant student employed at Tata Consultancy Services, was in a relationship with Subashini, his schoolmate and girlfriend. The couple, both well-educated and professionally qualified, had plans to marry. Yet, that love story ended in bloodshed — sacrificed at the altar of caste pride.

Why is India’s cheetah project under fire? Study flags ecological, social, species injustices

By Rajiv Shah A recent peer-reviewed study has sharply criticized Project Cheetah—India’s high-profile initiative to reintroduce African cheetahs into the wild—as ethically compromised, scientifically flawed, and socially unjust. Titled “Delineating the Environmental Justice Implications of an Experimental Cheetah Introduction Project in India”, the paper is authored by Yashendu C. Joshi, Stephanie E. Klarmann, and Louise C. de Waal, and was published in Frontiers in Conservation Science.

The myth of population decline: India’s real challenge is density, not fertility

By N.S. Venkataraman* India’s population in 2025 stands at approximately 1.4 billion. In 1950, it was 359 million, rising sharply to 1.05 billion by 2000. The population continues to grow and is projected to reach around 1.7 billion by 2050.

Siang dam project sparks debate over security, development, and displacement in Arunachal

By Aarna Gupta* The proposed Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP) in Arunachal Pradesh, India, has emerged as a contentious initiative shaped by strategic, environmental, and social concerns. Indian officials, including Union Minister Kiren Rijiju and Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu, have voiced strong support for the project. One of the primary motivations is China’s plan to build a 60,000 MW hydropower dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo River (the upper stretch of the Brahmaputra) in Tibet, which Indian authorities see as a threat to water and national security. In response, the 11,000 MW Siang Dam, with its 9 billion cubic meter reservoir, is viewed as a necessary countermeasure to manage water flow and reduce vulnerability.

Shanghai Textbook reassessed: Between revolutionary rhetoric and economic reality

By Harsh Thakor "Maoist Economics and the Revolutionary Road to Communism: The Shanghai Textbook on Socialist Political Economy" (1975) presents a detailed exposition of the Chinese perspective on socialist political economy under Mao . Developed during the Cultural Revolution, it outlines a theoretical framework for the functioning of a socialist alternative to capitalism. The book was formulated under the direction of Zhang Chunqiao, who played a central role in discussions, content planning, and final reviews of the draft.

Trump’s tariff tactics are a geopolitical bully move that may backfire

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent move to impose high tariffs on Indian goods is yet another example of his aggressive, unilateralist economic policy—an attempt to pressure and punish rather than to negotiate. This is not an isolated action. Trump has shown similar hostility toward other countries aligned with the BRICS bloc—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—reflecting his disdain for multipolar global cooperation and his desire to maintain American economic supremacy at all costs.

Search This Blog