Skip to main content

Parliamentary discussion on Indian Constitution: A missed opportunity for introspection

By Vikas Meshram* 
On the occasion of the 75th year of the implementation of the Indian Constitution, a four-day discussion was held in both Houses of Parliament. This was a golden opportunity for introspection. While drafting the world's largest written Constitution, our founding fathers deliberated on every word and article with utmost seriousness. This was an opportunity to revisit and reflect on the values embedded in our Constitution. The discussion should have focused not only on the structure of the Constitution but also on the progress of our nation, the success of its implementation, and the development of our democracy. Unfortunately, the essence of the discussion was completely lost, and it ended up being limited to personal accusations and counter-accusations.
The Indian Constitution is not just a written document; it is a vital charter of the principles, values, and goals of our nation. The values of "equality, liberty, justice, and fraternity" enshrined in the Preamble are not mere words; they should be reflected in every aspect of our national life. Our Constitution established a secular democratic republic. Beyond caste, religion, gender, language, and economic status, citizens must experience equality, liberty, and justice. But in the past 75 years, to what extent have we realized these values? Have we created an ideal model of accepting and respecting our differences? Have we overcome the past challenges of caste discrimination, religious tensions, and economic inequality? It was imperative to address these questions. However, instead of confronting these issues, the parliamentary debate devolved into political maneuvering.
Parliamentary discussions are supposed to be a platform for intellectual exchange. They serve as a medium for addressing national problems and suggesting solutions through deliberation. However, the quality of debates in recent times has been deteriorating. Personal accusations, political jibes, and criticisms have become the defining characteristics of parliamentary discussions. The debate held on the 75th anniversary of the Constitution was no exception. Both the ruling party and the opposition used this platform to further their political agendas. Instead of revisiting the principles and goals of the Constitution, the discussions resembled election rallies. The ruling party focused on exposing the opposition’s past mistakes, while the opposition spent time criticizing the policies of the government.
During the drafting of the Constitution, India was grappling with severe challenges such as Partition, religious strife, social fragmentation, and economic disparities. Despite these circumstances, the Constitution's architects chose the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity to unify the nation.
Visionaries like Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Purushottam Das Tandon, and Alladi Krishnaswamy Ayyar contributed to its drafting. Despite differences of opinion, they set aside their disagreements to develop a collective vision for the nation. They embraced the ideals of equality and social justice, ensuring that every citizen, regardless of religion, caste, gender, or language, would have equal opportunities. However, today, our political debates glaringly lack their vision.
The 75th year of the Constitution’s implementation was a chance for us to introspect. Have we made proper use of the rights granted by the Constitution? Have we fulfilled our duties as citizens? Has public participation in democratic processes increased? These are questions that should have been addressed. Parliamentary debates could have provided a meaningful platform for introspection. Instead, these discussions were marred by personal accusations and counter-accusations. Political parties wasted time pointing out each other’s flaws but lacked the courage to acknowledge their own shortcomings.
Leaders must not limit their respect for the Constitution to mere oaths. They bear the responsibility of embodying its principles through their actions. They must take initiatives to ensure freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
Political parties need to move beyond electoral politics and focus on national interest. The debates should transcend personal criticism and blame games to formulate actionable strategies for the nation's progress and the realization of constitutional goals. The Constitution sets forth the ideal of fraternity, but today's scenario shows that we are straying from it. Social inequality persists due to divisions based on religion, caste, and language, often exacerbated for political gain. Fraternity must not remain confined to speeches but should be demonstrated through actions. Every citizen must internalize the value of fraternity and foster a sense of unity.
Parliamentary debates should not be restricted to verbal sparring. Discussions must be idea-centric, focusing on national problems and their solutions. By studying the thought processes of the Constitution’s framers, we can chart a path for national progress aligned with their vision.
Both the ruling and opposition parties must engage in respectful dialogue during parliamentary debates. These discussions should not be limited to political accusations and counter-accusations. Respecting the Constitution means embodying its principles in practice. Mere speeches or declarations will not suffice. Strengthening democratic processes and fulfilling constitutional objectives require proactive efforts.
Understanding the spirit of the Constitution and striving for national progress is every citizen’s duty. The Constitution is not just the philosophy of a single nation; it is an inspiring ideology that sets an example for the entire world.
The 75th anniversary of the Constitution was an opportunity for introspection, but it was squandered. Neither the ruling party nor the opposition made proper use of this occasion. The Indian Constitution has provided us with the ideals of fraternity, equality, and justice. These ideals should not remain confined to speeches; we bear the responsibility of realizing them through action. Translating the Constitution’s values into practice and paving the way for the nation’s progress is the true tribute to our Constitution.
---
*Senior journalist

Comments

TRENDING

US-China truce temporary, larger trade war between two economies to continue

By Prabir Purkayastha   The Trump-Xi meeting in Busan, South Korea on 30 October 2025 may have brought about a temporary relief in the US-China trade war. But unless we see the fine print of the agreement, it is difficult to assess whether this is a temporary truce or the beginning of a real rapprochement between the two nations. The jury is still out on that one and we will wait for a better understanding of what has really been achieved in Busan.

When growth shrinks people: Capitalism and the biological decline of the U.S. population

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Critically acclaimed Hungarian-American economic historian and distinguished scholar of economic anthropometric history, Prof. John Komlos (Professor Emeritus, University of Munich), who pioneered the study of the history of human height and weight, has published an article titled “The Decline in the Physical Stature of the U.S. Population Parallels the Diminution in the Rate of Increase in Life Expectancy” on October 31, 2025, in the forthcoming issue of Social Science & Medicine (SSM) – Population Health, Volume 32, December 2025. The findings of the article present a damning critique of the barbaric nature of capitalism and its detrimental impact on human health, highlighting that the average height of Americans began to decline during the era of free-market capitalism. The study draws on an analysis of 17 surveys from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (...

Justice for Zubeen Garg: Fans persist as investigations continue in India and Singapore

By Nava Thakuria*  Even a month after the death of Assam’s cultural icon Zubeen Garg in Singapore under mysterious circumstances, thousands of his fans and admirers across eastern India continue their campaign for “ JusticeForZubeenGarg .” A large digital campaign has gained momentum, with over two million social media users from around the world demanding legal action against those allegedly responsible. Although the Assam government has set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT), which has arrested seven people, and a judicial commission headed by Justice Soumitra Saikia of the Gauhati High Court to oversee the probe, public pressure for justice remains strong.

Is vaccine the Voldemort of modern medicine to be left undiscussed, unscrutinised?

By Deepika*    Sridhar Vembu of Zoho stirred up an internet storm by tweeting about the possible link of autism to the growing number of vaccines given to children in India . He had only asked the parents to analyse the connection but doctors, so called public health experts vehemently started opposing Vembu's claims, labeling them "dangerous misinformation" that could erode “vaccine trust”!

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Trump escalates threats of war against Venezuela, as millions in US set to lose essential benefits

By Manolo De Los Santos   The United States government is in the grips of one of its longest-running funding gaps in history. The ongoing government shutdown has already stretched beyond 30 days and now, the food security of millions of Americans is at risk as the funding to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is drying up and Trump officials have refused to tap into contingency funds . Approximately 42 million individuals per month rely on SNAP benefits and are set to lose them beginning on November 1.

Gujarat civil society to move Supreme Court against controversial electoral roll revision

By Rajiv Shah    A recent, well-attended meeting of Gujarat civil society activists in Ahmedabad , held to discuss the impact of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, has decided to file a petition in the Supreme Court against the controversial exercise initiated by the Election Commission of India (ECI) across the country. Announcing this, senior High Court advocate Anand Yagnik , who heads the Gujarat chapter of the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), said that a committee has already been formed to examine the pros and cons of SIR. “While the SIR exercise began in Gujarat on November 4 and is scheduled to continue for a month, we will file a supporting petition in the case against SIR in the Gujarat High Court or the Supreme Court after observing how it proceeds in the state,” he said. Yagnik’s announcement followed senior advocate Shahrukh Alam —who is arguing the SIR case in the Supreme Court—urging Gujarat’s civil society to also file ...

Why PESA, a Birsa Munda legacy, remains India’s unfulfilled commitment to its tribal peoples

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  Nearly three decades ago, the Indian Parliament enacted a landmark law for tribal regions — the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, better known as PESA. This legislation sought to restore the traditional autonomy of tribal societies and empower them to use local resources according to their customs and needs. However, such decentralization never sat well with today’s developmental politicians, capitalists, and bureaucrats. The question therefore arises — what makes PESA so important?