Ban on Moolwasi Bachao Manch which advocated alternative governance model based on local control over resources

By Harsh Thakor*

The Moolwasi Bachao Manch (MBM) is a collective platform in Chhattisgarh representing Adivasi communities across multiple districts. It opposes the establishment of military camps, displacement, environmental degradation, and resource exploitation driven by mining activities supported by both foreign and domestic corporations. MBM has gained prominence over the past three years by resisting state-supported initiatives that prioritize industrial and imperialist development models at the cost of indigenous livelihoods and rights.

The ban on MBM is framed as a broader state effort to suppress grassroots movements that challenge dominant political and economic frameworks. The state’s action against MBM reflects a trend of increasing repression aimed at silencing dissent, particularly among marginalized communities resisting resource extraction projects. Critics argue that such measures are part of a strategy to consolidate power by targeting organizations advocating for self-determination and social justice.

Recent operations, including aerial bombings in regions like Mettaguda and Bottethong, illustrate the state’s militarized response to dissent. These actions have been criticized for targeting civilians and suppressing peaceful resistance. The government’s focus on militarization, particularly through initiatives like Operation Kagar, is seen as an attempt to maintain control over resource-rich areas while sidelining democratic rights and local governance.

The state’s development model, driven by foreign direct investment, has led to widespread displacement and the erosion of traditional livelihoods. Large-scale resource extraction projects have displaced Adivasi communities, disrupting their cultural and economic practices. Critics emphasize the need for an alternative development model that prioritizes local needs, environmental sustainability, and social equity.

MBM and similar movements advocate for an alternative governance model based on local control over resources. Examples include the Janathana Sarkars, which operate in some regions as grassroots governance structures. These bodies have implemented land redistribution, provided agricultural support, and fostered economic self-reliance. Such initiatives aim to create sustainable livelihoods while challenging traditional power hierarchies and gender norms.

Despite these efforts, challenges remain. The influence of armed groups and limited mass participation in some regions undermine the independence and democratic character of local governance structures. Additionally, there is a lack of broader coordination with other marginalized groups, such as urban workers and peasants in plain areas, which could strengthen the resistance against state repression.

The ban on MBM is viewed by its supporters as an attack on the right to dissent and organize. It highlights ongoing tensions between state-led development policies and grassroots movements advocating for environmental and social justice. Critics argue that the ban underscores the urgent need for unified resistance to safeguard democratic rights and promote inclusive development.

Comments

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year.

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital.

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor* Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra* The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs.

A balancing act? Global power rivalry over Iran challenges India’s foreign policy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* A stable Iran is clearly in India’s interest. While US President Donald Trump has so far avoided a direct attack, the situation remains deeply uncertain. The central problem is that few governments take Trump’s words at face value. His actions have revealed a clear pattern: Washington targets adversaries even while pretending to negotiate with them.

Search This Blog