Skip to main content

Ambedkar’s name has been chanted repeatedly for the sake of spurious goals by all and sundry

By Ananda Maitreya* 
The recent fracas in the Indian parliament over the remarks of Home Minister Amit Shah related to Dr. Ambedkar brings up an important point. This is regardless of the intent of Amit Shah, and what many others, chiefly in the opposition, have made of it. 
Ambedkarite activists have been highlighting the fact that Dr. Ambedkar’s name has been misused increasingly. There is, what can be called, a tokenism involved in invoking him. People not really invested in his struggle, his interventions, his concerns, his commitment to the uplift of the Dalits have nevertheless chosen to drop his name indiscriminately according to their expediency. 
It is similar with other bahujan crusaders like Savitribai and Jotiba Phule. It is equally fashionable to shout out Jai Bhim along with a raft of other Jai-s and salam-s.
The world has seen such casual appropriation if you will, of icons like Che Guevara and Malcolm X. 
Earlier Dalit leaders like Chandrashekhar Azad, the MP from Nagina (UP), had deplored the sudden love for the Constitution which political parties were flaunting before the 2024 elections. 
A shallow and utilitarian use of Dr. Ambedkar is indeed a selfish appropriation of his struggle and legacy. That might even be counted as an insult.
But no national leader was more aware of indignities and insults heaped on him as was Dr. Ambedkar. The sordid details of the withdrawal of his invitation to the Jat Pat Todak Mandal forced to have his undelivered lecture, The Annihilation of Caste, published, which has become a classic. 
In the preface to his book, "Who were the Shudras", Ambedkar dwells on the angry reactions he receives for his writings, especially from those he calls ‘Orthodox Hindus’:
“What the Orthodox Hindu will say about this book I can well imagine for I have been battling with him all these years. The only thing I did not know was how the meek and non- violent-looking Hindu can be violent when anybody attacks his Sacred Books. I became aware of it as never before when last year I received a shower of letters from angry Hindus, who became quite unbalanced by my speech on the subject delivered in Madras. The letters were full of filthy abuse, unmentionable and unprintable, and full of dire threats to my life…What I would like to tell these amiable gentlemen is that they will not be able to stop me by their imprecations.”
Dr. Ambedkar was unstoppable in his mission and he did not care for insults thrown at him. And at any rate, he did not need someone else to bat for him. He was fully capable of forming his own rejoinders. 
His legacy has seen several slurs, from defacement of his statues all over India to most recently to misinterpretation of his stands on various issues. So, the current instance of a supposed lashing out by Amit Shah about the excessive use of his name would surely not have offended Babasaheb. He, who was endlessly reviled, would well have anticipated his name being taken in vain. 
Whatever Shah meant - whether it reflected the old right-wing frustration with Ambedkarite assertion or not - it does highlight the fact that Dr. Ambedkar’s name has been chanted repeatedly for the sake of spurious goals, by all and sundry.
The show of supposed outrage by the various political parties robbed the citizens of India precious time for debating and discussing issues in the parliament during the winter session. As such, the session is short. And it was cut shorter by people willing to capitalize on an issue Dr. Ambedkar would have pooh-poohed. 
He would have just continued working for the cause he fought for. As he stated regarding criticisms and censure in the book referenced above: ‘...if the Hindus of this generation do not take notice of what I have to say I am sure the future generation will. I do not despair of success. For I take consolation in the words of the poet Bhavabhuti who said, "Time is infinite and earth is vast, some day there will be born a man who will appreciate what I have said."’ No politician - a home minister or a leader of the opposition - can either add to or subtract from his achievements.
---
*Peace and justice activist in Delhi NCR

Comments

TRENDING

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative   The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs. 

A balancing act? Global power rivalry over Iran challenges India’s foreign policy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A stable Iran is clearly in India’s interest. While US President Donald Trump has so far avoided a direct attack, the situation remains deeply uncertain. The central problem is that few governments take Trump’s words at face value. His actions have revealed a clear pattern: Washington targets adversaries even while pretending to negotiate with them.