JNU administration must desist from intimidating faculty members who demand their rightful entitlements

Counterview Desk

JNUTA statement on 'continuing brazenness of the JNU administration':

***

The Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers Association (JNUTA) notes that the Honourable High Court of Delhi, in an order dated 10.12.2024 on the contempt petition CONT.CAS(C) 626/2024, has observed that, in its prima facie view, JNU has violated the Court’s order dated 26.08.2019 in W.P.(C) 9185/2019. This matter pertains to the appointment of Chairpersons without adhering to the principle of rotation in the order of seniority. Accordingly, the Court has issued a notice to the University to show cause as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated.

The JNUTA observes that this instance of disrespect toward the orders and observations of the Court, exhibited by the JNU Administration, is not an exception. Rather, such conduct has become a recurring feature of its functioning, reflecting the lawless character of the University’s governance processes. This trend, firmly established under the previous Vice-Chancellor, has reached greater heights under the current dispensation. Notably, the Vice-Chancellor herself is the principal respondent in the contempt petition that led to the aforementioned order.

The contemptuous attitude of the JNU Administration toward the Court was also evident in the matter that led to the recent judgment of the Delhi High Court in W.P.(C) 16488/2024. In its order dated 28.11.2024, the Court directed the release of the Leave Encashment of a faculty member who retired in 2022 and had been chargesheeted for participating in a protest. The Court observed that withholding Leave Encashment on the grounds of a pending chargesheet was unlawful and ordered 9% per annum interest on the delayed payment. It is pertinent to note that this litigation arose from the JNU Administration’s disregard of previous Delhi High Court orders in similar cases. In all such instances, the withholding of Leave Encashment on account of a stayed chargesheet was deemed unlawful, and the Court considered those precedents in its recent judgment.

The Honourable Supreme Court has recently reiterated: “It is a well-settled principle of law that where a citizen aggrieved by the action of a government department has approached the Court and obtained a declaration of law in his/her favor, others similarly situated ought to be extended the benefit without the need for them to go to Court.” The JNU Administration’s actions in the above case and several others contravene this principle. For instance, the Court’s orders in W.P.(C) 12385/2024 and W.P.(C) 12392/2024 regarding the rectification of promotion dates apply to multiple cases. Similarly, the orders in W.P.(C) 2737/2019 and W.P.(C) 4399/2021, dated 20.12.2023, setting aside promotion rejections, also extend to several other faculty members. Yet, the University has failed to provide relief to all similarly affected individuals.

The JNU Administration’s blatant disregard for Court directives is further evident in W.P.(C) 14822/2024. The Court directed the University to consider the long-pending CAS applications of two petitioners and issue “reasoned and speaking orders” if rejecting them. However, the Administration’s response, issued at the last possible moment, lacks reason and blatantly evades proper consideration. Despite resuming the CAS process under pressure from JNUTA and Court orders, the process remains selective and arbitrary. Moreover, the Administration continues to exploit probation and confirmation processes to intimidate and oppress faculty members.

The JNUTA warns the JNU Administration to desist from intimidating faculty members who demand their rightful entitlements. It must respect the overwhelming sentiment expressed by the faculty through the recent elections of teachers’ representatives to the University’s Executive Council. The 321st EC meeting on 18.12.2024, held online with no pre-circulated agenda and minimal notice, exemplifies the Administration’s lack of transparency and accountability. The meeting, lasting barely seven minutes, rubber-stamped decisions without discussion, further eroding the credibility of the Executive Council.

The JNUTA strongly condemns the brazenness displayed by the Administration and appeals to all faculty members to rally together to uphold the dignity and rights of teachers. It is time to disabuse the University leadership of any notion that JNU is their fiefdom, allowing them to act with impunity.

-- Moushumi Basu, President, JNUTA; Syed Akhtar Husain, Secretary, JNUTA

Comments

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

The Epstein shock, global power games and India’s foreign policy dilemma

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The “Epstein” tsunami has jolted establishments everywhere. Politicians, bureaucrats, billionaires, celebrities, intellectuals, academics, religious gurus, and preachers—all appear to be under scrutiny, even dismantled. At first glance, it may seem like a story cutting across left, right, centre, Democrats, Republicans, socialists, capitalists—every label one can think of. Much of it, of course, is gossip, as people seek solace in the possible inclusion of names they personally dislike.

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Gujarat No 1 in Govt of India pushed report? Not in labour, infrastructure, economy

By Rajiv Shah A report by a top Delhi-based think tank, National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER), prepared under the direct leadership of Amitabh Kant, ex-secretary, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP), Government of India, has claims that Gujarat ranks No 1 in the NCAER State Investment Potential Index (N-SIPI), though there is a dig. N-SIPI has been divided into two separate indices. The first one includes five “pillars” based on which the index has been arrived it. These pillars are: labour, infrastructure, economic conditions, political stability and governance, and perceptions of a good business climate. It is called N-SIPI 21, as it includes a survey of 21 states out of 29.

Search This Blog