Skip to main content

How assembly elections in Jharkhand and Maharashtra showcased divisive agenda

By Ram Puniyani* 
The RSS-BJP and their affiliates consistently exploit opportunities to deepen the demonization of religious minorities. Although legal provisions exist to penalize hate speech, such incidents often go unpunished. Over the past decade, with a communal party in power, this trend has dangerously escalated, fostering negative perceptions about religious minorities. These attitudes, reflected in community WhatsApp groups and social interactions, have normalized hatred against minorities across significant sections of society. This intensifying hate rhetoric undermines the principles of fraternity and communal harmony, which are foundational to the Indian Constitution.
Newer dog whistles have evolved into overt calls for action. These narratives build on existing misconceptions and deepen societal divisions. Misperceptions such as portraying Mughal rulers as foreign oppressors who destroyed temples and forcibly converted Hindus are now amplified by slogans like “Hum Do Hamare Do, Woh Panch Unke Pachees” (We [Hindus] are two; they [Muslims] are twenty-five). Refugee camps for Muslims are disparagingly referred to as "child production factories." Additional divisive rhetoric labels Muslims as identifiable by their attire, cow slaughterers, and perpetrators of "love jihad," which has expanded into a series of conspiracies like "land jihad" and "vote jihad."
Ahead of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, Prime Minister Modi delivered numerous hate speeches. According to Human Rights Watch, he made 110 Islamophobic remarks during the campaign. The report highlights that these remarks aimed to undermine political opposition by accusing them of promoting Muslim rights and instilling fear among the majority Hindu population through disinformation.
In another shocking instance, Modi referred to Congress's reservation policies for Muslims as “appeasement,” describing them as part of a "despicable attempt" at Islamizing India. He accused Congress of trying to divide the nation by exploiting the Justice Verma and Sachar Committee reports to "loot" the reservation benefits of OBCs, SCs, and STs (The Times of India, 2024c).
The assembly elections in Jharkhand and Maharashtra further showcased this divisive agenda. In Jharkhand, BJP leader Himanta Biswa Sarma spread propaganda about Muslim infiltrators, despite the state having no international border. A derogatory BJP advertisement depicted a large Muslim family invading a Hindu household. Although the Election Commission eventually pulled it down, the ad had already circulated widely. Another baseless claim suggested that Muslim men marry Adivasi women to take over their land. The Prime Minister himself amplified this narrative with the slogan "Roti, Beti, Mati" (livelihood, daughter, land), implying that Muslims were threatening these essentials.
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath added to this divisive rhetoric with his slogan “Batenge to Katenge” (If we divide, we’ll be butchered), emphasizing Hindu unity. RSS leader Dattatraya Hosabale echoed this, stating that the unity of Hindus is the organization’s "lifetime pledge." Modi modified Adityanath’s slogan to “Ek hain to safe hain” (If Hindus are united, they will be safe), reinforcing the narrative that Hindu unity is essential for protection from minorities, who are portrayed as a threat under the slogan “Hindu khatre mein hai” (Hindus are in danger).
In Maharashtra, the Chief Minister not only perpetuated myths of "land jihad" and "vote jihad" but also derided the Bharat Jodo Yatra by labeling its participants as “Urban Naxals” and ultra-left elements.
These divisive strategies have deepened polarization, influencing voting patterns and shaping social perceptions. This is evident in countless WhatsApp groups and everyday conversations in Hindu households.
Prominent scholar Christophe Jaffrelot highlights a study by CSDS (conducted in March-April 2024) that explores Hindu perceptions of Muslims. The study found widespread negative views, with respondents questioning Muslims' trustworthiness and alleging undue appeasement.
Despite this, BJP leaders, including Modi, publicly deny using communal rhetoric. In interviews, Modi claimed, “The day I start talking about Hindu-Muslim [in politics], I will be unfit for public life.” Yet, his actions starkly contradict these assertions. This hypocrisy exacerbates the atmosphere of hate, pushing Muslims toward second-class citizenship and driving ghettoization.
To counter this growing polarization, it is essential to promote an alternative narrative rooted in India’s syncretic traditions. This narrative, central to the freedom movement, emphasized unity among people of all religions. Upholding these constitutional values is crucial to preserving communal harmony and fostering fraternity.
---
Political commentator.

Comments

TRENDING

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Uttarakhand tunnel disaster: 'Question mark' on rescue plan, appraisal, construction

By Bhim Singh Rawat*  As many as 40 workers were trapped inside Barkot-Silkyara tunnel in Uttarkashi after a portion of the 4.5 km long, supposedly completed portion of the tunnel, collapsed early morning on Sunday, Nov 12, 2023. The incident has once again raised several questions over negligence in planning, appraisal and construction, absence of emergency rescue plan, violations of labour laws and environmental norms resulting in this avoidable accident.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

UP tribal woman human rights defender Sokalo released on bail

By  A  Representative After almost five months in jail, Adivasi human rights defender and forest worker Sokalo Gond has been finally released on bail.Despite being granted bail on October 4, technical and procedural issues kept Sokalo behind bars until November 1. The Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) and the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP), which are backing Sokalo, called it a "major victory." Sokalo's release follows the earlier releases of Kismatiya and Sukhdev Gond in September. "All three forest workers and human rights defenders were illegally incarcerated under false charges, in what is the State's way of punishing those who are active in their fight for the proper implementation of the Forest Rights Act (2006)", said a CJP statement.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...