Skip to main content

Addressing caste discrimination in US higher education: Rutgers report sparks controversy

By Rajiv Shah 
In a surprise move, an American university has published a "controversial" report titled "Caste-Based Discrimination in US Higher Education and at Rutgers". The report has sparked debate, as no sooner was it released than an Indian diaspora advocacy group, CasteFiles, filed a complaint against Rutgers University and Prof. Audrey Truschke, co-chair of the task force that prepared the report. The complaint, filed under Title VI of the US Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleges violations of the right to education free from harassment and discrimination.
What is CasteFiles? According to its website, the group seeks to “challenge the harmful labeling of caste in the global lexicon.” It argues that the term is of Portuguese origin and "not relevant in North America," where it claims caste is being "legitimized in policy." The group asserts, “We oppose the textbook theory of caste as a Hindu construct” and insists, “It is high time the world and Indians themselves stopped typecasting India as the land of the caste system.”
The report has garnered significant attention, particularly from those who aim to downplay casteism as a hierarchical social system prevalent in India and among Indian communities abroad. Prof. Audrey Truschke, known for her book "Aurangzeb: The Man and the Myth" (2017), has faced accusations of Hinduphobia from Hindutva supporters in both India and the US, who have frequently trolled her online.
Be that as it may, the Rutgers report begins by noting that "many Americans lack awareness of caste as a type of social stratification." The report defines caste as an inherited and immutable social hierarchy marked by unequal power relations. It highlights the discrimination faced by Dalits, described as a "preferred term for 'untouchables' in the Indian caste system."
The report argues that understanding "the key dimensions of caste is essential to educating the Rutgers community and combating caste-based discrimination on and off campus." It provides examples of harassment and discrimination, such as a PhD student at the University of Alabama who was denied a position by a lab director based on caste. Similarly, a Dalit student at Rutgers shared in 2021 how every Indian peer he met would inquire about his caste. “I try my best to hide it. Either I say ‘I don’t know’ or I try to say something else. It’s not just older people; even my peers are the same. I always feel afraid to tell Indians because once they find out, they start treating me differently,” the student explained.
The report quotes Kevin Brown, a law professor at Indiana University, who says, “The United States doesn’t recognize the concept of caste, so it’s not included in any of our laws that prohibit discrimination. There are very few protections for Dalits in the United States.”
The report notes that this lack of legal recognition extends to New Jersey, where Rutgers is based. "New Jersey State Police do not consider caste a cause of bias incidents," it states, adding that other agencies, such as the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, also do not track caste-related claims. Nonetheless, the report cites a 2021 FBI investigation into caste-based labor trafficking at a temple in Robbinsville, New Jersey, where low-caste workers were subjected to grueling labor under exploitative conditions.
Further, a Rutgers professor recounted an incident in class where an Indian student openly declared they were Brahmin and that their parents would never allow them to marry a Dalit, even if the Dalit partner were successful or wealthy. The professor admitted feeling powerless to address the harmful implications of casteism due to the lack of explicit protections against caste-based discrimination.
The report concludes by recommending that Rutgers add caste as a protected category under its nondiscrimination policy, collect data on caste-based discrimination, and actively raise awareness. This is particularly significant given that, according to 2023 Census estimates, individuals of Indian origin constitute 4.6% of New Jersey's population. Nationwide, the Indian American population stands at five million and continues to grow.

Comments

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By  Rajendra Singh*  The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  

Safety, pay and job security drive Urban Company gig workers’ protest in Gurugram

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers associated with Urban Company have stepped up their protest against what they describe as exploitative and unsafe working conditions, submitting a detailed Memorandum of Demands at the company’s Udyog Vihar office in Gurugram. The action is being seen as part of a wider and growing wave of dissatisfaction among gig workers across India, many of whom have resorted to demonstrations, app log-outs and strikes in recent months to press for fair pay, job security and basic labour protections.

Public responses to the niqab incident and Iltija Mufti’s legal complaint

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  Following an incident in which the Chief Minister of Bihar was seen pulling aside the niqab of a Muslim woman doctor during a public interaction, the episode drew widespread attention and debate across India. Public reactions were divided, with some defending the action and others criticising it as an infringement on personal autonomy and dignity. The incident was widely circulated on social media and reported by national and international media outlets.