Skip to main content

Addressing caste discrimination in US higher education: Rutgers report sparks controversy

By Rajiv Shah 
In a surprise move, an American university has published a "controversial" report titled "Caste-Based Discrimination in US Higher Education and at Rutgers". The report has sparked debate, as no sooner was it released than an Indian diaspora advocacy group, CasteFiles, filed a complaint against Rutgers University and Prof. Audrey Truschke, co-chair of the task force that prepared the report. The complaint, filed under Title VI of the US Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleges violations of the right to education free from harassment and discrimination.
What is CasteFiles? According to its website, the group seeks to “challenge the harmful labeling of caste in the global lexicon.” It argues that the term is of Portuguese origin and "not relevant in North America," where it claims caste is being "legitimized in policy." The group asserts, “We oppose the textbook theory of caste as a Hindu construct” and insists, “It is high time the world and Indians themselves stopped typecasting India as the land of the caste system.”
The report has garnered significant attention, particularly from those who aim to downplay casteism as a hierarchical social system prevalent in India and among Indian communities abroad. Prof. Audrey Truschke, known for her book "Aurangzeb: The Man and the Myth" (2017), has faced accusations of Hinduphobia from Hindutva supporters in both India and the US, who have frequently trolled her online.
Be that as it may, the Rutgers report begins by noting that "many Americans lack awareness of caste as a type of social stratification." The report defines caste as an inherited and immutable social hierarchy marked by unequal power relations. It highlights the discrimination faced by Dalits, described as a "preferred term for 'untouchables' in the Indian caste system."
The report argues that understanding "the key dimensions of caste is essential to educating the Rutgers community and combating caste-based discrimination on and off campus." It provides examples of harassment and discrimination, such as a PhD student at the University of Alabama who was denied a position by a lab director based on caste. Similarly, a Dalit student at Rutgers shared in 2021 how every Indian peer he met would inquire about his caste. “I try my best to hide it. Either I say ‘I don’t know’ or I try to say something else. It’s not just older people; even my peers are the same. I always feel afraid to tell Indians because once they find out, they start treating me differently,” the student explained.
The report quotes Kevin Brown, a law professor at Indiana University, who says, “The United States doesn’t recognize the concept of caste, so it’s not included in any of our laws that prohibit discrimination. There are very few protections for Dalits in the United States.”
The report notes that this lack of legal recognition extends to New Jersey, where Rutgers is based. "New Jersey State Police do not consider caste a cause of bias incidents," it states, adding that other agencies, such as the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, also do not track caste-related claims. Nonetheless, the report cites a 2021 FBI investigation into caste-based labor trafficking at a temple in Robbinsville, New Jersey, where low-caste workers were subjected to grueling labor under exploitative conditions.
Further, a Rutgers professor recounted an incident in class where an Indian student openly declared they were Brahmin and that their parents would never allow them to marry a Dalit, even if the Dalit partner were successful or wealthy. The professor admitted feeling powerless to address the harmful implications of casteism due to the lack of explicit protections against caste-based discrimination.
The report concludes by recommending that Rutgers add caste as a protected category under its nondiscrimination policy, collect data on caste-based discrimination, and actively raise awareness. This is particularly significant given that, according to 2023 Census estimates, individuals of Indian origin constitute 4.6% of New Jersey's population. Nationwide, the Indian American population stands at five million and continues to grow.

Comments

TRENDING

Telangana government urged to stop 'unconstitutional' relocation of Chenchu tribes

By A Representative   The Nallamalla forests are witnessing a renewed surge of indigenous resistance as the Chenchu adivasis, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG), have formally launched the Chenchu Solidarity Forum (CSF) on the eve of World Earth Day to combat what they describe as unlawful and forced relocation from the Amrabad Tiger Reserve. 

Kolkata dialogue flags policy and finance deficit in wetland sustainability

By A Representative   Wetlands were the focus of India–Germany climate talks in Kolkata, where experts from government, business, and civil society stressed both their ecological importance and the urgent need for stronger conservation frameworks. 

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

'Fraudulent': Ex-civil servants urge President to halt Odisha tribal land dispossession

By A Representative   A collective of 81 retired civil servants from the Constitutional Conduct Group has written to the President of India expressing alarm over what they describe as the wrongful dispossession of tribal lands in Odisha’s Rayagada district. The letter, dated April 19, 2026, highlights violent clashes in Kantamal village where police personnel reportedly injured over 70 tribal residents attempting to protect their community rights. 

Cracks in Gujarat model? Surat’s exodus reveals precarity behind prosperity claims

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*   The return of migrant workers from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, particularly from Gujarat, was inevitable. Gujarat has long been showcased as the epitome of “infrastructure” and the business-friendly Modi model. Yet, when governments become business-friendly, they require the poor to serve them—while keeping them precarious, unable to stabilize, demand fair wages, or assert their rights. The agenda is clear: workers must remain grateful for whatever crumbs the Seth ji offers.  

Dhandhuka violence: Gujarat minority group seeks judicial action, cites targeted arson

By A Representative   The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat has written to the Director General of Police seeking judicial action in connection with recent violence in Dhandhuka town of Ahmedabad district, alleging targeted attacks on properties belonging to members of the Muslim community following a fatal altercation between two bike riders on April 18.

Maoist activity in India: Weakening structures, 'shifts' in leadership, strategy and ideology

By Harsh Thakor*  Recent statements by government representatives have suggested that Maoism in India has been effectively eliminated, citing the weakening of central leadership and intensified security operations. These claims follow sustained counterinsurgency efforts across key regions, including central and eastern India. However, available information from security agencies and independent observers indicates that while the organizational structure of the CPI (Maoist) has been significantly disrupted, elements of the movement remain active. Reports acknowledge the continued presence of cadres in certain forested regions such as Bastar and parts of Dandakaranya, alongside smaller, decentralized units adapting their operational strategies.

Why link women’s reservation to delimitation? The unspoken political calculus

By Vikas Meshram*  April 16, 2026, is likely to be recorded as a special day in the history of Indian democracy. In a three-day special session of Parliament, the central government is set to introduce a comprehensive package of three historic bills: the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026; the Delimitation Bill, 2026; and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026. The stated purpose of all three is the same: to implement the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (106th Constitutional Amendment) passed in 2023. However, the political intent concealed behind these measures — and their impact on the federal balance — is far more profound. It is absolutely essential to understand this.

The high price of unemployment: The human cost of the drug crisis in J&K

​By Raqif Makhdoomi*  ​ Jammu and Kashmir is no longer merely at risk of a drug epidemic ; it is losing the fight. The statistics are staggering, with approximately 13.5 lakh people—nearly 8% of the total population—caught in the grip of substance abuse . In the ranking of Indian Union Territories , Jammu and Kashmir now sits at a grim top. We have officially reached a point where we can no longer speak in hypotheticals about a future crisis. The vocabulary has shifted from "if" to "if not addressed immediately."