Skip to main content

Addressing caste discrimination in US higher education: Rutgers report sparks controversy

By Rajiv Shah 
In a surprise move, an American university has published a "controversial" report titled "Caste-Based Discrimination in US Higher Education and at Rutgers". The report has sparked debate, as no sooner was it released than an Indian diaspora advocacy group, CasteFiles, filed a complaint against Rutgers University and Prof. Audrey Truschke, co-chair of the task force that prepared the report. The complaint, filed under Title VI of the US Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleges violations of the right to education free from harassment and discrimination.
What is CasteFiles? According to its website, the group seeks to “challenge the harmful labeling of caste in the global lexicon.” It argues that the term is of Portuguese origin and "not relevant in North America," where it claims caste is being "legitimized in policy." The group asserts, “We oppose the textbook theory of caste as a Hindu construct” and insists, “It is high time the world and Indians themselves stopped typecasting India as the land of the caste system.”
The report has garnered significant attention, particularly from those who aim to downplay casteism as a hierarchical social system prevalent in India and among Indian communities abroad. Prof. Audrey Truschke, known for her book "Aurangzeb: The Man and the Myth" (2017), has faced accusations of Hinduphobia from Hindutva supporters in both India and the US, who have frequently trolled her online.
Be that as it may, the Rutgers report begins by noting that "many Americans lack awareness of caste as a type of social stratification." The report defines caste as an inherited and immutable social hierarchy marked by unequal power relations. It highlights the discrimination faced by Dalits, described as a "preferred term for 'untouchables' in the Indian caste system."
The report argues that understanding "the key dimensions of caste is essential to educating the Rutgers community and combating caste-based discrimination on and off campus." It provides examples of harassment and discrimination, such as a PhD student at the University of Alabama who was denied a position by a lab director based on caste. Similarly, a Dalit student at Rutgers shared in 2021 how every Indian peer he met would inquire about his caste. “I try my best to hide it. Either I say ‘I don’t know’ or I try to say something else. It’s not just older people; even my peers are the same. I always feel afraid to tell Indians because once they find out, they start treating me differently,” the student explained.
The report quotes Kevin Brown, a law professor at Indiana University, who says, “The United States doesn’t recognize the concept of caste, so it’s not included in any of our laws that prohibit discrimination. There are very few protections for Dalits in the United States.”
The report notes that this lack of legal recognition extends to New Jersey, where Rutgers is based. "New Jersey State Police do not consider caste a cause of bias incidents," it states, adding that other agencies, such as the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, also do not track caste-related claims. Nonetheless, the report cites a 2021 FBI investigation into caste-based labor trafficking at a temple in Robbinsville, New Jersey, where low-caste workers were subjected to grueling labor under exploitative conditions.
Further, a Rutgers professor recounted an incident in class where an Indian student openly declared they were Brahmin and that their parents would never allow them to marry a Dalit, even if the Dalit partner were successful or wealthy. The professor admitted feeling powerless to address the harmful implications of casteism due to the lack of explicit protections against caste-based discrimination.
The report concludes by recommending that Rutgers add caste as a protected category under its nondiscrimination policy, collect data on caste-based discrimination, and actively raise awareness. This is particularly significant given that, according to 2023 Census estimates, individuals of Indian origin constitute 4.6% of New Jersey's population. Nationwide, the Indian American population stands at five million and continues to grow.

Comments

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.