West Bengal death penalty bill 'an attempt to deflect attention from widespread protests'

By Kirity Roy*

The West Bengal government has put forth a new anti-rape bill that aims to impose capital punishment on individuals convicted of rape in cases where the victim dies or is left in a vegetative state. The West Bengal Legislative Assembly passed this controversial bill, titled 'Aparajita Woman and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill, 2024,' with support from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the primary opposition party in the region.

This legislation has emerged in the wake of the tragic rape and murder of a trainee doctor at Kolkata’s RG Kar Medical College and Hospital. This horrifying incident, which took place on August 9, 2024, has shaken the nation's conscience. The brutal attack on a 31-year-old doctor at her workplace has highlighted significant failures within the State Health Department, the police investigation, and the broader administrative framework in West Bengal.

In response to this egregious act and the persistent demands for justice from citizens across the state, the West Bengal government introduced this bill, which many view as an attempt to deflect attention from the widespread protests against the systemic failures that allowed such violence to occur.

However, the introduction of the death penalty does not provide a comprehensive solution to the issue of crime, as it fails to tackle the underlying causes and intricacies of criminal behavior. There is no solid empirical evidence to suggest that capital punishment effectively deters crime. A civilized society cannot accept the notion of retribution through execution, as it merely perpetuates a cycle of violence.

Both Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights underscore the right to life, liberty, and personal security, all of which are violated by the death penalty. To date, 112 countries have abolished capital punishment in all circumstances, while an additional 9 have done so for common law offenses, and 23 other nations are in the process of eliminating it. Nonetheless, 55 countries, including India, maintain the death penalty.

In the aftermath of the Nirbhaya rape and murder case, the Justice Verma Committee recommended against the death penalty

It is crucial to recognize that the fight for women’s rights is intrinsically linked to the struggle against systemic patriarchy in India. It is disheartening to see laws, courts, parliaments, and governmental bodies perpetuate a flawed system that fails to protect the vulnerable.

In the aftermath of the Nirbhaya rape and murder case, the Justice Verma Committee recommended against the death penalty, stating, "In the larger interests of society, and considering current sentiments favoring the abolition of the death penalty, we are not inclined to recommend such a punishment." Yet, ruling political parties continue to advocate for capital punishment as a means of delivering justice for personal and political agendas.

Mahatma Gandhi’s poignant assertion that “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” serves as a crucial reminder that violence cannot resolve violence. The cycle of revenge and state-sanctioned killings only exacerbates existing societal issues. True leadership should prioritize reconciliation over retribution.

---

*Secretary of Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM); National Convenor for the Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI)

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog