Bulldozer justice? How government officials simply seek to please their political patrons

By Vikas Meshram*

The Supreme Court has not only raised objections but also expressed concern over the practice of demolishing the homes of criminal suspects, accused, or convicts using bulldozers. It has indicated that necessary guidelines will be issued to all states in this regard. In such circumstances, the court's intervention is indeed welcome. A bench comprising Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K.V. Viswanathan made these remarks while hearing petitions seeking a ban on the bulldozer actions being carried out by administrations in several states. The bench clarified that they would not offer protection to unauthorized constructions or encroachments, including religious structures built on roads. It also emphasized the need to ensure that no individual or officer takes undue advantage of any legal loophole.

In recent years, several states, including Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Maharashtra, have taken punitive actions by demolishing the homes of accused individuals in criminal cases using bulldozers. This practice has been viewed as a violation of citizens' rights and the judicial process. The widespread use of bulldozers has been seen as a new affliction on the justice system, leading to growing opposition.

During the hearing, Justice B.R. Gavai questioned how a house could be demolished just because the owner was an accused. Even if a person is found guilty, such actions cannot be taken without following due legal process. Justice K.V. Viswanathan added a thoughtful remark, asking why a father should be punished for the rebellious actions of his son. This statement carries significant meaning.

On the other hand, the Uttar Pradesh administration argued in court that all demolished properties were illegal, and proper legal procedures had been followed. However, in many such cases, the reasons for the demolitions caused additional complications. Before taking such drastic measures, the authorities must clearly demonstrate how the property in question is illegal and explain how legal procedures were followed. This would help avoid potential disputes.

Instead of adopting quick-fix solutions like demolitions, decisions on criminal punishment should be left to the courts. It is essential to think from a humane perspective, as even if a person is involved in a serious crime, actions like demolishing their home cannot be taken without completing the legal process. The court rightly emphasized this point. At the same time, it made clear that this does not imply offering protection to illegal constructions.

In reality, the government and administration have argued that the demolitions targeted properties involved in illegal activities. However, without ensuring that the necessary procedures are followed, such arguments do not hold weight. In recent times, it has become common to see homes of notorious criminals, murderers, and rapists being bulldozed.

Even if a person is involved in a serious crime, actions like demolishing their home cannot be taken without completing the legal process

The ostensible reason is to instill fear in such offenders. But, viewed broadly, such actions do not stand up to legal scrutiny or humane principles. That is why political parties and social organizations have raised concerns from time to time, and such questions are natural in any civilized society.

The Supreme Court's reasoning, which states that such actions are illegal after charges have been filed, is something we can agree with. However, such actions should not be taken even after guilt is proven. Undoubtedly, a home represents the identity of a family. It takes a lifetime to build, and it belongs to all family members, not just the accused or guilty person. Punishing innocent family members by making them homeless is not only illegal but also an inhumane step. Punishing those who have no involvement in the crime is unjust. Moreover, if the house is demolished based on allegations and the accused is later found innocent, who will be responsible for rebuilding it?

Government officials should act wisely and prudently rather than simply pleasing their political patrons. Undoubtedly, the issue of encroachments is widespread across the country and should be addressed from a legal standpoint, without considering religion or caste. Unfortunately, politicians play a significant role in encouraging such encroachments. They often attempt to legalize illegal constructions over time to build vote banks.

There is a need for nationwide guidelines on removing encroachments and using bulldozers so that political parties cannot misuse such actions for their benefit. The process for demolishing illegal structures should be uniform and apply to everyone equally. The process of removing illegal constructions should be ongoing throughout the year, and selecting specific cases or timings for such actions is inappropriate. That is why the Supreme Court has sought suggestions from all stakeholders on this issue, so that logical and uniform guidelines can be provided to state governments across the country regarding the use of bulldozers, while ensuring that the concept of justice remains intact.

Comments

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857 By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

The curious case of multiple entries of a female voter of Maharashtra: What ECI's online voter records reveal

By Venkatesh Nayak* Cyberspace is agog with data, names and documents which question the reliability of the electoral rolls prepared by the electoral bureaucracy in Maharashtra prior to the General Elections conducted in 2024. One such example of deep dive probing has brought to the surface, the name of one female voter in the 132-Nalasopara (Gen) Vidhan Sabha Constituency in Maharashtra. Nalasopara is part of the Palghar (ST) Lok Sabha constituency. This media report claims that this individual's name figures multiple times in the voter list of the same constituency.

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Spirit of leadership vs bondage: Of empowered chairman of 100-acre social forestry coop

By Gagan Sethi* This is about Khoda Sava, a young Dalit belonging to the Vankar sub-caste, who worked as a bonded labourer in a village near Vadgam in Banskantha district of North Gujarat. The year was 1982. Khoda had taken a loan of Rs 7,000 from the village sarpanch, a powerful landlord doing money-lending as his side business. Khoda, who had taken the loan for marriage, was landless. Normally, villagers would mortgage their land if they took loan from the sarpanch. But Khoda had no land. He had no option but to enter into a bondage agreement with the sarpanch in order to repay the loan. Working in bondage on the sarpanch’s field meant that he would be paid Rs 1,200 per annum, from which his loan amount with interest would be deducted. He was also obliged not to leave the sarpanch’s field and work as daily wager somewhere else. At the same time, Khoda was offered meal once a day, and his wife job as agricultural worker on a “priority basis”. That year, I was working as secretary...

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman* Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Proposed Modi yatra from Jharkhand an 'insult' of Adivasi hero Birsa Munda: JMM

Counterview Desk The civil rights network, Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (JMM), which claims to have 30 grassroots groups under its wings, has decided to launch Save Democracy campaign to oppose Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vikasit Bharat Sankalp Yatra to be launched on November 15 from the village of legendary 19th century tribal independence leader Birsa Munda from Ulihatu (Khunti district).

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

Govt of India "tarnishing" NGO reputation, dossier leaked selectively: Amnesty

Counterview Desk Amnesty International India has said that a deliberate attempt is being made to tarnish its reputation by leaking a dossier, supposedly made by investigating agencies, to media without giving it access to any such information. The high profile NGO’s claim follows a Times Now report about proceedings launched by investigative agencies, including Enforcement Directorate (ED) against the rights body for “violations” of rules pertaining to overseas donations.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Search This Blog