Skip to main content

'Human rights violation': Local farmer 'severely torture' by BSF personnel

By Kirity Roy* 
An alarming incident has emerged from Panchberia, a village located along the Indo-Bangladesh border within the Bagdah police station jurisdiction of North 24 Parganas district. Hajrat Sheikh, a local farmer and the clerk (Mohurer) of the Bagdah Block Land and Land Reforms Office, was reportedly subjected to severe torture by Border Security Force (BSF) personnel. This incident raises significant concerns, violating Articles 21, 19, and 22 of the Indian Constitution. 
On the morning of August 20, 2024,  visited his agricultural land, which is situated behind barbed wire fencing near the Panchberia BSF camp. During this visit, he was confronted by the Panchberia Post Commander, who, according to witnesses, displayed erratic behavior attributed to intoxication while on duty. The BSF accused Hajrat of facilitating illegal crossings between India and Bangladesh through his land. 
Following this accusation, Hajrat was subjected to verbal abuse and threats before being compelled to enter the camp, where he endured physical assaults. Reports indicate he was beaten with batons, punched in the eyes and ears—resulting in a perforated eardrum and severe bruising. The assault escalated to him being thrown to the ground and kicked repeatedly, leading to broken ribs and near asphyxiation. 
After being released from custody, Hajrat sought immediate medical attention at Bagda hospital, subsequently consulting an ENT specialist for his ear injury and an orthopedic doctor for his rib injuries. The following day, on August 22, 2024, Hajrat reported a troubling incident where civic police from Bagdah police station forcibly entered his home around 2 a.m., exhibiting aggressive behavior and attempting to apprehend him. 
Despite his pleas due to his medical condition, the officers departed without further action. Notably, no female officers accompanied the four male constables during this midnight intrusion, violating established protocols, especially given Hajrat's wife was also present at the residence. 
The Bagdah police have alleged that Hajrat is involved in serious offenses related to illegal border crossings, believing their actions are justified. Hajrat was summoned for interrogation on August 23, 2024, and subsequently lodged formal complaints with the Superintendant of Police (S.P.) for the Bongaon District, as well as the Sub-Divisional Police Officer (S.D.P.O.) and the Officer in Charge (O.C.) of Bagdah Police Station, expressing fears for his safety and the possibility of false charges. 
Panchayat officials support BSF actions. Their complicity extends to enforcing curfews on a road vital for local commerce 
However, no concrete action appears to have been taken by these authorities. Moreover, the police provided Hajrat with a document indicating the registration of a case (Case No. 824, dated September 2, 2024), yet no details were shared regarding the nature of the complaint or the individuals involved. Notably, Hajrat's written complaint was sent to the relevant officials on August 23—weeks prior to the registration date cited by the police. 
Further investigation by our fact-finding team revealed that Hajrat continues to face threats from BSF personnel to retract his complaints. Local governance figures, including the Boyra Gram Panchayat Pradhan and the Up-Pradhan reportedly support the BSF’s actions and remain silent on the matter. This complicity extends to enforcing curfews on the IBBR road—vital for local commerce—only intensifying the discontent among villagers. 
This egregious violation of human rights underscores the need for urgent accountability within the security forces. 
To this end, we call upon the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to intervene promptly with the following recommendations: 
- A comprehensive investigation into the incident by the NHRC's investigative wing. 
- Immediate legal action against the BSF personnel and Bagdah police officers involved. 
- A cessation of the collusion between Gram Panchayat members and the BSF. 
- Protection for Hajrat Sheikh until proven guilty of any accusations.
--- 
*Secretary Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM). This report is based on the author's submission to the NHRC

Comments

TRENDING

How strategic is India's commercial expansion in the Mediterranean?

By Vijay Prashad  On 26 October 2026, Greece’s foreign minister George Gerapetritis stood at the United Nations headquarters and rejected the maritime agreement between Turkey and Libya. Gerapetritis spoke on behalf of Greece of course, but also Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, the European Union, and the United Arab Emirates. Five days later, the Indian frigate INS Trishul entered Souda Bay in Crete as part of activities with the US Navy installation (Naval Support Activity) and with the NATO Maritime Interdiction Operational Training Centre. The sequence illuminates a developing strategic geography: India’s naval reach, its confrontation with Pakistan’s new Turkish partner, and its ambition to connect Indian capital to European markets increasingly converge in the eastern Mediterranean.

India among targets as China-linked hackers 'exploit' VPNs, firewalls

Counterview News   Cyberattackers grew faster and harder to detect in 2025, increasingly slipping through trusted systems rather than breaking in with obvious malware, claims U.S.-based  cybersecurity technology company CrowdStrike's 2026 Global Threat Report . The report says adversaries "grew more evasive than ever before," exploiting trust in supply chain partners, legitimate software, internal systems and employees. CrowdStrike now tracks 281 adversaries after naming 24 new ones in 2025, plus 150 activity clusters and emerging threat groups.

Letter to Modi seeks cancellation of "coercive" anti-NGO order on foreign funding rules

By A Representative  Around 70 civil rights organizations have come together to strategize “a collective response to the stifling of civil society space” in the wake of the recent Government of India clampdown on NGOs, telling Prime Minister Narendra Modi that government steps are “coercive” in nature, are “without reasonable cause or due process”, and seek to “cripple” the ability of NGOs to “carry on their legitimate and sanctioned work.”