Skip to main content

Starmer's 'lumpen politics'? Fading mass hope following Conservative defeat in UK

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
In a Labour Party Election Broadcast on April 16th, 2024, Sir Keir Starmer highlighted how his working-class background influences his approach to politics. In a BBC interview on May 27th, 2024, Sir Starmer reinforced his working-class roots and promised to serve the interests of the working people in Britain. He even described himself as a progressive and a socialist. However, the mass hope following the Conservative Party's defeat is fading as Starmer's politics and policies as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom are revealed. 
As he unveils himself as PM, he not only betrays his working-class voters but also his own working-class heritage. Starmer’s ideology, political positions, principles and policies changes more often than British weather. There is nothing called political pledge to principles for him.  
In a recent press briefing on 27th of August 2024, Prime Minister Starmer warned the working masses in Britain that the upcoming October budget would be painful. He advised people to "accept short-term pain for long-term good." He is planning to implement Tory austerity measures that will increase the cost of everyday living for working people. 
Starmerism is an ideology-free zone where commitment to principles is denied, and the lumpen politics of opportunism are promoted to uphold the interests of the transnational and national capitalist classes in Britain. He seized every opportunity to suppress democratic dissent within the party, ensuring that there is no space for popular leftist leadership or socialist debates within the Labour Party under his leadership. 
In doing so, Starmer has not only dismantled the Labour Party as a democratic socialist party but also transformed the party into a second-rate Tory party. The traditional labour party is doomed, and the future of Britain looks bleak under Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.
Austerity is not an economic policy; it is a project by the capitalist class to drain the pockets of working people. Austerity measures create economic conditions where the working masses suffer in crisis, normalising low wages and naturalising job insecurity. These conditions of low wages and job insecurity undermine a productive environment for innovation and diminish the productive abilities of the working class. 
Britain began experiencing rising wealth inequalities and increasing low incomes during the 1980s due to policies of liberalisation, privatisation, and globalisation. These policies introduced structural adjustments and internal austerity measures as policy alternatives. In reality, austerity can neither help in the short term nor in the long term. 
It works against social, economic, and scientific progress and prosperity. It creates conditions of destitution that destabilises economy. Therefore, austerity is a destructive economic choice, now being adopted by the Labour government under the leadership of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.  
Starmer has not only dismantled the Labour Party as a democratic socialist party but also transformed the party into a second-rate Tory party
The working people are suffering from the rising cost of living crisis, whereas British corporations are making super profits. The Labour Party government under Keir Starmer is working like the Tories to protect the super-rich in Britain by marginalising the working people. His electoral promises and his actions in government are diametrically opposed to each other. 
The working masses did not vote for austerity measures in health, education, transportation, and other welfare services. People gave a landslide victory to the Labour Party to recover from the crisis, not to normalise it in their everyday lives in Britain.
The lumpen politics of the Labour Party under Starmer's leadership reveals that there is no fundamental difference between the Conservative and Labour leadership. Both uphold the interests of the British establishment. It is clear that these two parties have failed and have no plans to uphold the interests of the working masses. 
Such an ideological alliance between the two mainstream parties in Britain creates an opportunity to establish the foundations of alternative politics based on peace, prosperity, and progress. By centering the interests of the working masses, this alternative approach can address the political and economic crises in British society.
Working-class mobilisation is the first step toward defeating these two mainstream parties and politics of their lumpen leadership. The working class's dependency on the British establishment must end. It is time to establish working-class politics as the only viable alternative to establishment politics. 
No more expenditures on wars and focus on people’s welfare. These possibilities can only address ongoing everyday crisis in Britain. 

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Ahmedabad's Sabarmati riverfront under scrutiny after Subhash Bridge damage

By Rosamma Thomas*  Large cracks have appeared on Subhash Bridge across the Sabarmati in Ahmedabad, close to the Gandhi Ashram . Built in 1973, this bridge, named after Subhash Chandra Bose , connects the eastern and western parts of the city and is located close to major commercial areas. The four-lane bridge has sidewalks for pedestrians, and is vital for access to Ashram Road , Ellis Bridge , Gandhinagar and the Sabarmati Railway Station .

Farewell to Robin Smith, England’s Lionhearted Warrior Against Pace

By Harsh Thakor*  Robin Smith, who has died at the age of 62, was among the most adept and convincing players of fast bowling during an era when English cricket was in decline and pace bowling was at its most lethal. Unwavering against the tormenting West Indies pace attack or the relentless Australians, Smith epitomised courage and stroke-making prowess. His trademark shot, an immensely powerful square cut, made him a scourge of opponents. Wearing a blue England helmet without a visor or grille, he relished pulling, hooking and cutting the quicks. 

No action yet on complaint over assault on lawyer during Tirunelveli public hearing

By A Representative   A day after a detailed complaint was filed seeking disciplinary action against ten lawyers in Tirunelveli for allegedly assaulting human rights lawyer Dr. V. Suresh, no action has yet been taken by the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, according to the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL).

Latur’s quiet rebel: Dr Suryanarayan Ransubhe and his war on Manuvad

By Ravi Ranjan*  In an India still fractured by caste, religion, and language, where narrow loyalties repeatedly threaten to tear the nation apart, Rammanohar Lohia once observed that the true leader of the bahujans is one under whose banner even non-bahujans feel proud to march. The remark applies far beyond politics. In the literary-cultural and social spheres as well, only a person armed with unflinching historical consciousness and the moral courage to refuse every form of personality worship—including worship of oneself—can hope to touch the weak pulse of the age and speak its bitter truths without fear or favour. 

Differences in 2002 and 2025 SIR revision procedures spark alarm in Gujarat

By A Representative   Civil rights groups and electoral reform activists have raised serious concerns over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Gujarat and 11 other states, alleging that the newly enforced requirements could lead to large-scale deletion of legitimate voters, particularly those unable to furnish documentation linking them to the 2002 electoral list.

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

From crime to verdict: The 27-year journey that 'rewarded' the destroyers of Babri Masjid

By Shamsul Islam    Thirty-three years ago, on December 6, 1992, a 16th-century mosque was reduced to rubble by a frenzied mob orchestrated by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and its political fronts. The demolition was not a spontaneous outburst of Hindu sentiment; it was the meticulously planned culmination of a hate campaign that branded Indian Muslims as “Babur-ki-aulad” and the Babri Masjid as a symbol of historical humiliation. 

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.