Skip to main content

'No to risky 11,000 MW hydroelectric project': Call to protect Siang river

Beverly Longid, Jiten Yumnam*
  
The civil rights network, International Indigenous Peoples Movement for Self-Determination and Liberation (IPMSDL), has voicesd its support for the residents of Siang District, Northeast India, as they resist the National Hydroelectric Power Corporation's (NHPC) efforts to monopolize the Siang River for its Upper Siang Hydroelectric Project, a massive undertaking proposed at 11,000 MW. 
On August 31, a demonstration was held in Siang District, led by farmers, students, and Indigenous communities opposing NHPC's aggressive surveying efforts. Local residents criticize these actions as lacking proper consultation and consider them a blatant disregard for Indigenous Peoples’ right to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC), as outlined in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), to which the Indian government is a signatory. 
If approved, the main dam would become the largest in the Indian subcontinent, positioning itself as a competitor to China's hydropower initiatives along the Tsangpo River, which flows through Tibet and Arunachal Pradesh. The Siang River, which traverses Southwest China, Northeast India, and Bangladesh, plays a crucial role in maintaining the regional ecosystem. 
The proposed hydropower project poses risks to local wildlife and habitats. Additionally, around 300 members of the Adi Indigenous community face potential displacement due to this project, endangering their way of life and cultural practices linked to the river. 
Various community organizations have condemned NHPC's actions through numerous statements and letters. In response, Deputy Commissioner P.N. Thungon issued an order prohibiting government employees and officials from participating in protests, labeling their actions as “anti-government” and “anti-development.” 
Critics argue large hydropower projects, often executed at the expense of peoples' land rights, cannot be considered sustainable
This move is widely regarded as a violation of the right to assembly, demonstrating a lack of respect for the rights of Indigenous peoples. The Siang Indigenous Farmers Forum has submitted a rejection letter to NHPC, declaring that “...surveys or related activities for the Siang Upper Multipurpose Project should not proceed without the consent of the stakeholders and those affected by the dam.” 
The North East Human Rights organization criticized the Deputy Commissioner’s order, asserting, “This is a clear misuse of power aimed at intimidating the public and community leaders from exercising their constitutional rights.” Despite the apparent focus on profit and political leverage, the Indian government promotes such projects under the guise of national development and security against China's influence in the region. 
They claim this initiative is part of a transition to non-coal and non-fossil fuel energy sources. However, critics argue that large hydropower projects, often executed at the expense of Indigenous peoples and their land rights, cannot be considered sustainable or clean energy solutions. 
The IPMSDL has backed with the Adi community and the people of Siang District in their fight against the NHPC and the Indian government's infringement on Indigenous rights. We must not remain passive while corrupt politicians and businesses exploit our natural resources and displace us from our ancestral lands, it said. 
---
*International Indigenous Peoples Movement for Self-Determination & Liberation co-convenors

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”