Skip to main content

Environmental nod to Karnataka projects: Govt of India's contradictory approach raises eyebrows

By Shankar Sharma* 
Recent decisions made by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) and the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) regarding environmental issues in Karnataka have stirred significant discussion in the local media. 
Environmentalists have welcomed the rejection of the Kalasa Nala Diversion project across the Mahadayi River (photo) and the Ministry's request for the Karnataka government to clarify the use of forest land for the Yettinahole Water Project. 
However, the conditional approval for the Goa-Karnataka power line cutting through the Mahaveer Wildlife Sanctuary has raised serious concerns among conservation advocates. 
This apparent contradiction has led many to question the government's environmental policies, suggesting they may be influenced by political factors. Critics point out the inconsistency in reasoning, noting that while the Kalasa Nala Diversion was rejected due to the expected felling of approximately 200,000 trees in a densely forested area, an even larger number of trees—many within a legally protected area—will likely need to be cut for the power line. 
Moreover, questions have emerged about the MoEFCC’s prolonged silence regarding the environmental impacts of the Yettinahole project, which has been in discussion for over a decade. 
Residents are alarmed by the fact that over the past six years, the MoEFCC has granted approvals for more than 270 projects within protected regions, contributing to the diversion of around 120,000 hectares of original forest land. Reports indicate that between July 2014 and April 2020, the Ministry approved 87% of the environment clearance requests made, leading to significant deforestation. 
Impartial approach to evaluating various project proposals in Western Ghats is essential for maintaining ecological integrity
Some political leaders are now using these reports to challenge the MoEFCC's inconsistent policies and its perceived lax enforcement of the Wildlife Protection Act and the Forest Conservation Act. 
There are growing fears that the Ministry may fail to address these political criticisms and uphold its responsibility to acts of forest conservation. To restore public confidence, the MoEFCC must reaffirm its commitment to safeguarding forests, rivers, and protected areas by rejecting all proposals for forest land diversion in these critical regions. 
This includes re-evaluating project proposals that threaten biodiversity and wildlife sanctuaries and ensuring a consistent application of environmental laws. 
In light of these challenges, MoEFCC and NBWL must promptly and permanently reject any proposals that would lead to the destruction of significant forestland in Karnataka's wildlife sanctuaries for hydropower projects. 
A comprehensive and impartial approach to evaluating the various project proposals in the Western Ghats is essential for maintaining ecological integrity. 
--- 
*Power & Climate Policy Analyst, Karnataka. This article reflects the author’s representation to the Minister of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, and the Vice-Chairperson of the National Board for Wildlife

Comments

TRENDING

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.