Failure of democratic ways to resolve Kashmir unrest root cause of JK terror attack: NAPM

Counterview Desk

The National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), India's well-known civil rights network, even as condemning the "fatal attack" on the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) convoy at Pulwama, killing 44 jawans, has insisted that "military and militant violence must end and give way to democratic aspirations of people of Kashmir".

Text of the statement signed, among others, by well-known civil rights leaders Medha Patkar, Dr Binayak Sen and Prafulla Samantara:Deeply pained at the loss of 44 human lives, NAPM condemns the militant car-bomb attack on the CRPF convoy in Pulwama, expresses its sincere condolences to each of the families of the CRPF personnel who were killed and hopes for early and complete recovery of those injured in the attack. We know that no amount of 'monetary compensation' can do justice for this loss of lives, which is also the result of the gross failure of the state and particularly the present government (which claims to be the custodian of the interests of jawans) to ensure a democratic resolution to the political problem in the region.

At this moment of national grief and mourning, NAPM expects that the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Defence Minister, Army Chief, all political parties, media and other sections of society would respond with maturity and sensitivity, refraining from any retributive statements or actions that would jeopardize peace and justice intiatives.
We warn the Government of India and 'powers-that-be', against using this tragic incident for their own ulterior political designs at the cost of justice and peace to the deceased jawans and people of Kashmir in particular and India at large.
While the admitted involvement of Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) in the present and earlier attacks is a matter of public record and JeM must be held accountable for its violent actions, it must be recognized that this alone cannot solve the problems of civil unrest, violence by the State and militant response by certain other sections in Kashmir.
It must also be noted that the role of the state of Pakistan in planning and facilitating attacks of such scale and intensity cannot be ignored and this calls for more political, economic and diplomatic pressure on Pakistan to prevent such attacks.
The 'Kashmir' question is undeniably a socio-political problem caused and exacerbated by decades of insincere and ineffective policies and politics at the Centre and state, massive militarization and consistent neglect of the democratic aspirations of the common people of Kashmir.
Viewing the political struggle, civil unrest and militancy in Kashmir only as a 'law and order' and 'territorial' problem to be handled by security forces comprising the State Police, Central Armed Police Forces and the Indian Army, is at the root of the problem.
The problem has only grown over the decades, with increasing alienation of the people of Kashmir, especially disenchantment of the youth, and excesses by the security forces on the one side and at times like this, of the army or police personnel on the ground, who are also drawn largely from the 'ordinary working and farming classes' of this country and are used as canon fodder by the political leadership!
It is high time India and Pakistan acknowledge that deployment of armed forces over decades by both states, to the exclusion of democratic avenues and engagement with the people of Kashmir at the centre of the process, has done nothing to solve the core concerns of Kashmiris.
NAPM calls upon both the Governments of India and Pakistan to acknowledge the enormous human cost of ignoring a democratic approach and resolution to the Kashmir question and expects both nation states to engage the people of Kashmir in formulating and spelling out their medium-term and long-term policies for the region.
Both the states must initiate talks with the common people of Kashmir, including youth and women, people’s organizations including militant organizations as a beginning for public confidence-building measures.
People-to-people contact between India and Pakistan in the larger interest of peace in the sub-continent must be immediately and consistently encouraged. Alongside, diplomacy initiatives with other neighbours, towards improving the internal security situation in Kashmir must also be taken up. The recent UN Report on human rights violations in Kashmir also should be taken seriously and justice must be ensured.
NAPM urges all parties concerned to accept the polintlessness of the cycle of violence as a means of finding a solution and instead initiate and engage in open and meaningful dialogue involving the different stake holders in order to end State and non-state violence and move forward towards a democratic resolution of the Kashmir conflict.

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog