Skip to main content

Appropriating an icon? Why is RSS-BJP "celebrating" Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose

By Ram Puniyani*
On January 23, BJP-RSS organized various programmes to honour Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. In one of these programs, a clash took place leading to a curfew in Kendrapada, Orissa. In different meeting organized by BJP-RSS, an attempt was made to draw parallel between Bose and Savarkar, Bose and RSS.
Propaganda is on to show that it was on Savarkar’s suggestion that Bose undertook to tie up with axis powers (Germany and Japan). Parallels are being drawn between RSS and INA (Azad Hind Fauj). Now all attempts are on to show that Bose’s nationalism was close to that of Savarkar-RSS.
The RSS combine is trying to praise Netaji as the one who gave legitimacy to struggle for Independence against British. When did this combine realize the contributions of this great freedom fighter? Or for that matter the question comes did RSS combine ever want to struggle against British rule?
It is last few years that these attempts to identify with national icons are going on. While in case of Sardar Patel the propaganda is that, had he been the first Prime Minster of India, we would not have had Kashmir problem, we would has progressed more. The truth in this matter is that Patel and Nehru were two solid pillars of Indian Cabinet who gave foundations to Indian republic. The differences among them were of minor nature and Patel was the most trusted Cabinet colleague of Nehru.
As far as Netaji is concerned, we know that he is one of the major freedom fighters of India. He was part of the Indian National Congress most of his life and was its President of Tripura session in 1939. Within Congress he was part of the socialist group. He and Nehru had matching ideas on issues of socialism, secularism among others.
He did fallout from Congress on the issue of method of getting freedom. While Gandhi-led Congress wanted to adopt the path of non violence, Netaji did not see eye to eye on this issue. For getting freedom for India, Congress launched ‘Quit India’ movement to build anti-British pressure, and this gave boost to the freedom struggle.
During the Second World War, Netaji’s approach was to launch armed military action against the British by collaborating with axis powers (Japan and Germany), that’s how he set up INA. He also formed free India’s provisional government in Singapore on October 21, 1943. He has been a charismatic leader who was thoroughly anti-British.
Undoubtedly Congress was firm in the path of non-violence. It launched Quit India movement which was led by Mahatma Gandhi. Bose did develop some differences on the matter of fighting against the British. He resorted to tying up with fascist Germany and its ally Japan.
What were RSS and Hindu nationalists doing at this point of time? Hindutva ideologue Savarkar, the progenitor of Hindutva and Hindu nation ideology, propagated at that time that Hindu nationalists should help British in their war efforts against Japan and Germany. RSS sarsanghchalak MS Golwalkar instructed all its branches not to do anything which will annoy British and kept aloof from the anti British struggles.
So while Congress was putting pressure on British through Quit India movement, Netaji was fighting British through INA, Savarkar was proactively helping the British by helping them in recruitment for armed forces. In a way, RSS did nothing which went against the British rule. So here, with a forked tongue, Hindu nationalists on one hand were supporting the British in their war efforts (Savarkar) or keeping aloof (Golwalkar-RSS), on the other now they are eulogizing Netaji for his anti-British INA!
While Netaji was socialist, close to the ideas held by Nehru, Golwalkar went on to write that communists are internal threat to the Hindu nation. While BJP at the time of its formation used the word Gandhian socialism, it was a mere electoral jumla (gimmick). The ideology and actions of Netaji and Hindu nationalists-RSS were poles apart. So why are they projecting him today? Why are they trying show similarities which are not there?
Essentially, as RSS did not participate in freedom movement, it does not have any national icon. RSS’ Atal Bihari Vajpayee at that time was a young college student who during Quit India movement was jailed by mistake; he apologized and got himself released. Savarkar, since he was anti-British before being imprisoned in Andman jail,/has been glorified as the brave warrior by prefixing Veer (brave) to his name. He also apologized to the British and got released from the jail.
Mostly the communal nationalists, Muslim League-Hindu Mahasabha-RSS, never took anti-British stance. This should be the defining point for Indian nationalism. Congress and Bose were anti-British to the core, so their nationalism in a way has similar wave length despite some differences.
When INA of Bose was being tried by British for their anti-war actions against the British, it was the likes of Nehru who defended the INA; none from the Hindu nationalist camp came forward to defend Bose and his colleagues during the trial by British. It is only for electoral reasons that now RSS-BJP need to identify with the likes of Patel and Bose. They are actively trying to dig up some points here and there to get a ride on the back of legends like Patel and Bose.
So far Sardar Patel has been projected and now it’s Netaji’s turn! Their central opposition is to Indian nationalism. They vilify Nehru, who stood rock solid in defense of secularism and democracy. Since RSS wants to oppose the Nehru legacy and Congress on electoral ground, it keeps propping up icons like these.
While these icons had some differences with Nehru, they essentially were on similar wave length as far as secular democratic values are concerned. These projections of Patel and Netaji are mere electoral ploys to garner more power!
---
*Well-known political commentator

Comments

GC said…
The left coined Netaji as a foreign agent...
Congress cheated Netaji every point of time when he was alive and also supressed his glorious life history from the people of the country. How can these parties cantslk about Netaji now?
T N RAMAKRSIHNA said…
RSS founder himself was associatedpleasant with Congress and was also a revolutionary. Savarkar inspired Hindu youths to join army so that they can revolt against British at an appropriate and opportune time.

RSS swayamsevaks have participated in freedom movement in their personal capacity. T N Ramakrishna President Rashtra Gaurava Samrakshana Parishath. +91 9845672560. www.rgspbharath.com
Unknown said…
Stop Bullshitting about RSS, visit The National Library in Calcutta and go through the archives. Read and get out of denial..Bose and Bengal were opposed to RSS and Hindu Mahasaba. RSS backstabbed are freedom fighters.

TRENDING

'Enough evidence': Covid vaccines impacted women's reproductive health

By Deepika*  In 2024, the news outlets have suddenly started reporting about covid vaccine side effects in a very extensive manner. Sadly, the damage is already done.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Dadi, poti discuss 'injustice' under 10 yr Modi rule: Video campaign goes viral

By Our Representative  Watan Ki Raah Mein, a civil society campaign of the Samvidhan Bachao Nagrik Abhiyan, has released a short video conversation on social media of an exchange of letters between a dadi and her poti discussing poverty, unemployment, corruption and women’s safety. The letters also raise the question of  suppression of our fundamental rights of speech, expression and justice. 

US 'frustrated' with India’s discomfort: Maritime exercise in South China Sea

By Vijay Prashad*  In early April 2024, the navies of four countries -- Australia, Japan, the Philippines, and the United States -- held a maritime exercise in the South China Sea. Australia’s Warramunga, Japan’s Akebono, the Philippines’ Antonio Luna, and the United States’ Mobile worked together in these waters to strengthen their joint abilities and -- as they said in a joint statement  -- to “uphold the right to freedom of navigation and overflight and respect for maritime rights under international law.” 

'Uncertainty in Iran': Raisi brokered crucial Chabahar Port deal with India

By Pranjal Pandey*  Ebrahim Raisi, the Iranian President, and the country’s foreign minister were tragically found deceased on May 20, 2024, shortly after their helicopter crashed in foggy conditions. In response, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei swiftly appointed a relatively unknown vice president as the interim leader.

Informal, outdoor workers 'excluded': Govt of India's excessive heat policies

Counterview Desk  Top civil rights network, National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), has demanded urgent government action to protect millions of outdoor workers from extreme heat and heatwaves, insisting declaration of heatwaves as climatic disaster.

Desist from academic censorship, stop threatening scholars: Letter to ICMR

Counterview Desk  In a letter to the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) director, the Universal Health Organisation (UHO) which consists of prominent health experts, has insisted that the Government of India’s top medical research agency should lead high quality research on vaccine safety and “desist from academic censorship”.

WHO move can 'enable' India to detain citizens, restrict freedom, control media

Counterview Desk  In an an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with copies to concerned Cabinet ministers, bureaucrats and MPs,  health rights network  People’s Alliance for Public Health (PAPH alias JanSwasthya Morcha), has urged that India should not be a signatory to the World Health Organization ( WHO) Pandemic Agreement and Amendments to the  International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005  to be adopted at the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva from 27th May to 1st June, 2024.

Vaccine nationalism? Covaxin isn't safe either, perhaps it's worse: Experts

By Rajiv Shah  I was a little awestruck: The news had already spread that Astrazeneca – whose Indian variant Covishield was delivered to nearly 80% of Indian vaccine recipients during the Covid-19 era – has been withdrawn by the manufacturers following the admission by its UK pharma giant that its Covid-19 vector-based vaccine in “rare” instances cause TTS, or “thrombocytopenia thrombosis syndrome”, which lead to the blood to clump and form clots. The vaccine reportedly led to at least 81 deaths in the UK.