Skip to main content

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!
Earlier, Sakshi Maharaj, BJP MP, called Nathuram Godse a real patriot, only to retract his statement after controversy erupted for glorifying the assassin of the Father of the Nation.
Ironically, it is not without reason that the ruling party, BJP, avoids calling the Mahatma as “the Father of the Nation”. Here, it appears to follow a 1961 advice by Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya, RSS pracharak, and founder general secretary of the Akhil Bharatiya Jan Sangh. A leader of Hindu Mahasabha, Dr Shyama Prasad Mookherjee, was another founder Jan Sangh (1951), which is forerunner of the BJP, established in 1980.
“History books have told you that Godse was a sarfira, a lunatic who killed Gandhi. But in reality, who was he? He was an educated man, the editor of newspapers ("Agrani Dainik" and "Rashtra Dharma"). He was a patriot, a freedom fighter,” Himani Savarkar, Godse's niece, and head of the radical Hindutva organisation, Abhinav Bharat, told "Indian Express" in 2015.
Daughter of Gopal Godse, younger brother and co-conspirator in the murder of the Mahatma, Himani was an architect by profession, and before her death, she brought out "Savarkar Samagra", a 10 volume "authentic" collection of writings by Barrister VB Savarkar, who is revered as Veer Savarkar.
“When Partition happened, he (Nathuram) was in Pune, his lands were not taken away, his mother and sisters were not assaulted, then what made him get up and go to Delhi? Because the women of Bengal and Punjab were also his sisters. And the man responsible for this vigathan (division), Gandhi, had to be removed,” she said.
This version of history is drawn largely from Godse’s testament in his trial at Red Fort in Delhi. It held that the Mahatma was not the man who led India to freedom; he in fact presided over, and was responsible for, India's division, and allegedly, as a final act of betrayal, sat on fast to “give” Pakistan Rs 55 crore in 1948.
On his 71st death anniversary, while the nation -- led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi -- was paying homage to the Mahatma, a self-styled Hindutva leader instantly shot into infamy by staging an ‘assassination’ of his effigy in Aligarh. The saffron-clad woman leader, Pooja Shakun Pandey, a mathematics professor, is a firebrand leader who often attracts media attention with her outlandish statements and actions.
She is no stranger to controversies. She is the national secretary of the All-India Hindu Mahasabha, and has told reporters that, just like effigies of Ravana are burned every year on Dussehra, she would like to make it a tradition to shoot at Gandhi’s effigies each year on January 30 -- the day he was shot dead by Godse.
Her husband, Ashok Pandey, joins her mission. “Poojaji is an extremely brave woman, who has taken sanyas from ordinary life to serve the cause of Hindutva,” Pandey said. “It’s a tragedy that in our country, an FIR is registered for shooting a pervert like Gandhi, who slept naked with his niece, and is responsible for the death of lakhs of Hindus.”
One feels sad when the person who resisted Partition till the very last is being blamed for it, and was shot dead by Godse on January 30, 1948, when he was going for the evening prayer at Birla House, Delhi. Notably, the Hindu Mahasabha of Savarkar and Dr Mookerjee, which blamed the Mahatma for Partition, joined hands with the Muslim League to be partners in at least three provinces -- Bengal, Sindh and North West Frontier after the Muslim League, led by Mohammad Ali Jinnah, passed a resolution seeking Pakistan in March 1940 at Lahore. Later, Dr Mookerjee was the Finance Minister in the Bengal government headed by Fazlul Haq, who moved the Pakistan Resolution!
Sardar Patel, deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister, in a letter to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru on February 27, 1948, referring to assassination of the Mahatma, said: “It ... clearly emerges ... that the RSS was not involved in it at all. It was a fanatical wing of the Hindu Mahasabha directly under Savarkar that (hatched) the conspiracy and saw it through."
He continued: "It also appears that the conspiracy was limited to some ten men, of whom all except two have been got hold of… Of course, his assassination was welcomed by those of the RSS and the Mahasabha, who were strongly opposed to his way of thinking and to his policy."
The Sardar added, "But beyond this, I do not think it is possible, on the evidence which has come before us, to implicate any other members of the RSS or the Hindu Mahasabha. The RSS jas undoubtedly other sins and crimes to answer for, but not for this one.”
Over the last seven decades, several petitions have been filed to review the Gandhi assassination case in the Supreme Court, though all of them have rejected, taking into account long trials and inquiry commissions. Now,efforts are on to malign Gandhi by right-wing politicians, though unsuccessfully.
Anup Sardesai writes in “Nathuram Godse: The Story of an Assassin”: “Godse, Gandhiji’s assassin, did not have any past record of indulging in communal violence or religious fanaticism... At a time when this country was going through chaotic times, and when its ‘so-called' Gandhian politicians lost the confidence of the masses, Godse began being looked upon as an alternative to the Gandhian ideology."
Sardesai,  who claims the motive behind writing his book was not to demean the Mahatma, nor glorify his assassin, adds, "As a result, the followers of Nathuram Godse are increasing with each passing day. Thus, it has become necessary to unearth the truth behind this religious fanaticism theory.”
Yet, none can deny the trend to malign the Mahatma by the likes of Pooja Shakun Pandey or Shakshi Maharaj, or those calling to erect the statues or temples in the name of “Pandit” Nathuram Godse. Meanwhile, the urn containing Godse’s ashes at Godse House, Pune, awaits immersion in the Indus River -- as and when India becomes Akhand Bharat to include Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Yet, the fact remains, the slogan Akhand Bharat has been forgotten by our present-day rulers, despite their claim to follow the preachings of Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar (Guruji), the second chief of RSS. Maybe Islamophobia restrains them!
---
*Senior journalist based in Ahmedabad, socio-political historian. Contact: haridesai@gmail.com. A version of this article was first published in Asia Voice

Comments

Unknown said…
Gandi was never a father of India - he and congress were farce as they resulted in the killing of millions of PUNJABIS due to partition of India.

TRENDING

Girl child education: 20 major states 'score' better than Gujarat, says GoI report

By Rajiv Shah
A Government of India report, released last month, has suggested that “model” Gujarat has failed to make any progress vis-à-vis other states in ensuring that girls continue to remain enrolled after they leave primary schools. The report finds that, in the age group 14-17, Gujarat’s 71% girls are enrolled at the secondary and higher secondary level, which is worse than 20 out of 22 major states for which data have been made available.

Congress 'promises' cancellation of Adani power project: Jharkhand elections

Counterview Desk
Pointing out that people's issues take a backseat in Jharkhand's 2019 assembly elections, the state's civil rights organization, the Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha, a coalition of activists and people’s organisations, has said that political parties have largely ignored in their electoral manifestos the need to implement the fifth schedule of the Constitution in a predominantly tribal district.

Hindutva founders 'borrowed' Nazi, fascist idea of one flag, one leader, one ideology

By Shamsul Islam*
With the unleashing of the reign of terror by the RSS/BJP rulers against working-class, peasant organizations, women organizations, student movements, intellectuals, writers, poets and progressive social/political activists, India also witnessed a series of resistance programmes organized by the pro-people cultural organizations in different parts of the country. My address in some of these programmes is reproduced here... 
***  Before sharing my views on the tasks of artists-writers-intellectuals in the times of fascism, let me briefly define fascism and how it is different from totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is political concept, a dictatorship of an individual, family or group which prohibits opposition in any form, and exercises an extremely high degree of control over public and private life. It is also described as authoritarianism.
Whereas fascism, while retaining all these repressive characteristics, also believes in god-ordained superiority of race, cultur…

Savarkar in Ahmedabad "declared support" to two-nation theory in 1937, followed by Jinnah three years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Ex-World Bank chief economist doubts spurt in India's ease of doing business rank

By Rajiv Shah
This is in continuation of my previous blog where I had quoted from a commentary which top economist Prof Kaushik Basu had written in the New York Times (NYT) a little less than a month ago, on November 6, to be exact. He recalled this article through a tweet on November 29, soon after it was made known that India's growth rate had slumped (officially!) to 4.5%.

With RSS around, does India need foreign enemy to undo its democratic-secular fabric?

By Shamsul Islam*
Many well-meaning liberal and secular political analysts are highly perturbed by sectarian policy decisions of RSS/BJP rulers led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, especially after starting his second inning. They are vocal in red-flagging lynching incidents, policies of the Modi government on Kashmir, the National Register of Citizens (NRC), the demand for 'Bharat Ratna' to Savarkar who submitted 6-7 mercy petitions to the British masters (getting remission of 40 years out of 50 years' sentence), and the murder of constitutional norms in Goa, Karnataka and now in Maharashtra.

Post-Balakot, danger that events might spiral out of control is 'greater, not less'

By Tapan Bose*
The fear of war in South Asia is increasing. Tensions are escalating between India and Pakistan after the Indian defence minister's announcement in August this year that India may revoke its current commitment to only use nuclear weapons in retaliation for a nuclear attack, known as ‘no first use’. According to some experts who are watching the situation the risk of a conflict between the two countries has never been greater since they both tested nuclear weapons in 1998.

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Worrying signs in BJP: Modi, Shah begin 'cold-shouldering' Gujarat CM, party chief

By RK Misra*
The political developments in neighbouring Maharashtra where a Shiv Sena-NCP-Congress government assumed office has had a trickle down effect in Gujarat with both the ruling BJP and the Congress opposition going into revamp mode.

'Favouring' tribals and ignoring Adivasis? Behind coercion of India's aborigines

By Mohan Guruswamy*
Tribal people account for 8.2% of India’s population. They are spread over all of India’s States and Union Territories. Even so they can be broadly classified into three groupings. The first grouping consists of populations who predate the Indo-Aryan migrations. These are termed by many anthropologists as the Austro-Asiatic-speaking Australoid people.