Skip to main content

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!
Earlier, Sakshi Maharaj, BJP MP, called Nathuram Godse a real patriot, only to retract his statement after controversy erupted for glorifying the assassin of the Father of the Nation.
Ironically, it is not without reason that the ruling party, BJP, avoids calling the Mahatma as “the Father of the Nation”. Here, it appears to follow a 1961 advice by Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya, RSS pracharak, and founder general secretary of the Akhil Bharatiya Jan Sangh. A leader of Hindu Mahasabha, Dr Shyama Prasad Mookherjee, was another founder Jan Sangh (1951), which is forerunner of the BJP, established in 1980.
“History books have told you that Godse was a sarfira, a lunatic who killed Gandhi. But in reality, who was he? He was an educated man, the editor of newspapers ("Agrani Dainik" and "Rashtra Dharma"). He was a patriot, a freedom fighter,” Himani Savarkar, Godse's niece, and head of the radical Hindutva organisation, Abhinav Bharat, told "Indian Express" in 2015.
Daughter of Gopal Godse, younger brother and co-conspirator in the murder of the Mahatma, Himani was an architect by profession, and before her death, she brought out "Savarkar Samagra", a 10 volume "authentic" collection of writings by Barrister VB Savarkar, who is revered as Veer Savarkar.
“When Partition happened, he (Nathuram) was in Pune, his lands were not taken away, his mother and sisters were not assaulted, then what made him get up and go to Delhi? Because the women of Bengal and Punjab were also his sisters. And the man responsible for this vigathan (division), Gandhi, had to be removed,” she said.
This version of history is drawn largely from Godse’s testament in his trial at Red Fort in Delhi. It held that the Mahatma was not the man who led India to freedom; he in fact presided over, and was responsible for, India's division, and allegedly, as a final act of betrayal, sat on fast to “give” Pakistan Rs 55 crore in 1948.
On his 71st death anniversary, while the nation -- led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi -- was paying homage to the Mahatma, a self-styled Hindutva leader instantly shot into infamy by staging an ‘assassination’ of his effigy in Aligarh. The saffron-clad woman leader, Pooja Shakun Pandey, a mathematics professor, is a firebrand leader who often attracts media attention with her outlandish statements and actions.
She is no stranger to controversies. She is the national secretary of the All-India Hindu Mahasabha, and has told reporters that, just like effigies of Ravana are burned every year on Dussehra, she would like to make it a tradition to shoot at Gandhi’s effigies each year on January 30 -- the day he was shot dead by Godse.
Her husband, Ashok Pandey, joins her mission. “Poojaji is an extremely brave woman, who has taken sanyas from ordinary life to serve the cause of Hindutva,” Pandey said. “It’s a tragedy that in our country, an FIR is registered for shooting a pervert like Gandhi, who slept naked with his niece, and is responsible for the death of lakhs of Hindus.”
One feels sad when the person who resisted Partition till the very last is being blamed for it, and was shot dead by Godse on January 30, 1948, when he was going for the evening prayer at Birla House, Delhi. Notably, the Hindu Mahasabha of Savarkar and Dr Mookerjee, which blamed the Mahatma for Partition, joined hands with the Muslim League to be partners in at least three provinces -- Bengal, Sindh and North West Frontier after the Muslim League, led by Mohammad Ali Jinnah, passed a resolution seeking Pakistan in March 1940 at Lahore. Later, Dr Mookerjee was the Finance Minister in the Bengal government headed by Fazlul Haq, who moved the Pakistan Resolution!
Sardar Patel, deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister, in a letter to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru on February 27, 1948, referring to assassination of the Mahatma, said: “It ... clearly emerges ... that the RSS was not involved in it at all. It was a fanatical wing of the Hindu Mahasabha directly under Savarkar that (hatched) the conspiracy and saw it through."
He continued: "It also appears that the conspiracy was limited to some ten men, of whom all except two have been got hold of… Of course, his assassination was welcomed by those of the RSS and the Mahasabha, who were strongly opposed to his way of thinking and to his policy."
The Sardar added, "But beyond this, I do not think it is possible, on the evidence which has come before us, to implicate any other members of the RSS or the Hindu Mahasabha. The RSS jas undoubtedly other sins and crimes to answer for, but not for this one.”
Over the last seven decades, several petitions have been filed to review the Gandhi assassination case in the Supreme Court, though all of them have rejected, taking into account long trials and inquiry commissions. Now,efforts are on to malign Gandhi by right-wing politicians, though unsuccessfully.
Anup Sardesai writes in “Nathuram Godse: The Story of an Assassin”: “Godse, Gandhiji’s assassin, did not have any past record of indulging in communal violence or religious fanaticism... At a time when this country was going through chaotic times, and when its ‘so-called' Gandhian politicians lost the confidence of the masses, Godse began being looked upon as an alternative to the Gandhian ideology."
Sardesai,  who claims the motive behind writing his book was not to demean the Mahatma, nor glorify his assassin, adds, "As a result, the followers of Nathuram Godse are increasing with each passing day. Thus, it has become necessary to unearth the truth behind this religious fanaticism theory.”
Yet, none can deny the trend to malign the Mahatma by the likes of Pooja Shakun Pandey or Shakshi Maharaj, or those calling to erect the statues or temples in the name of “Pandit” Nathuram Godse. Meanwhile, the urn containing Godse’s ashes at Godse House, Pune, awaits immersion in the Indus River -- as and when India becomes Akhand Bharat to include Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Yet, the fact remains, the slogan Akhand Bharat has been forgotten by our present-day rulers, despite their claim to follow the preachings of Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar (Guruji), the second chief of RSS. Maybe Islamophobia restrains them!
---
*Senior journalist based in Ahmedabad, socio-political historian. Contact: haridesai@gmail.com. A version of this article was first published in Asia Voice

Comments

Unknown said…
Gandi was never a father of India - he and congress were farce as they resulted in the killing of millions of PUNJABIS due to partition of India.

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”