Skip to main content

No aadhaar, no ration? Hard blow by Gujarat govt on poor and marginalized

By Pankti Jog*
Only those who have aadhaar registration and linked it with ration card will get ration from a Public Distribution System (PDS) shop. This decision of the Gujarat government has hit very badly thousands of poor and marginalized communities of Gujarat, especially during the drought year.
The Gujarat government has always been eager to make aadhaar compulsory for many of the government benefits like scholarship scheme, Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS), and social security schemes like old age pension, widow pension etc. However, this time it is the turn of ration which one is supposed to get from PDS, ensured under the National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013, passed by Parliament.
The Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel (MAGP) has been receiving complaints on poor implementation and corruption in Annapurna Yojana of the state government. Annapurna Yojana was launched by the government to ensure 5 kg of ration (wheat and rice) to priority households in rural and urban areas for Rs 2 per kg and Rs 3 per kg respectively. As per the law, 75% of the rural households and 50% of the urban households need to be given this benefit.
However, in Gujarat, for the last two months, the government has stopped giving ration to those who do not have aadhaar or those who have not linked aadhaar with the ration card yet.
In Danta block of Banaskantha district, the Right to Information (RTI) helpline team recently went in for cross checking after receiving several complaints on their helpline regarding ration being denied.
In one of the Fair Price Shops (FPS) at Dalpura village of Danta block of Banaskantha district, the team found that the names have been checked off with black pen for those who do not have aadhaar. When checked with the person at the FPS, he comfirmed that he has been given instructions by the mamlatdar's office that only those to who have aadhaar will get ration under Annapurna Yojana.
The team checked further in more than 30 villages in Danta block, and learnt that the situation is very pathetic. The government has turned so insensitive that it is denying ration for not having aadhaar, and only one third part of the ration quota is being allocated as per the NFSA. Similar situation was found in many villages of Devgadh Bariya block of Dahod district, too.
The Gujarat government came up wiith 5 different circulars in 2017, mentioning that aadhaar is preferable for availing benefit of a scheme. In one the circulars it is also mentioned that all individuals (beneficiaries) are expected to be linked. But it has not used the word mandatory for every individual with a ration card to get linked with aadhaar for getting ration.
Ironically, when contacted, the office of the principle secretary, Food and Civil Supplies Department, said the government has not taken any such decision.
However, for the past two months, in some of the poorest tribal blocks, while interacting with FPS license holders in Danta and Devgadh Bariya, they confirmed that the “e-FPS portal” displays only those names that have aadhaar, one reason why their names were cancelled and struck down with black pen.
The RTI helpline team checked things live during ration distribution in Dalpura village FPS shop, and it was shocked to see that in one of the ration cards, there were 10 members. While 9 names were displayed, the one that did not have aadhaar was not displayed.
This reveals that e-FPS software has been modified and automatically deletes the names on the basis of the availability of aadhaar. If the state government has not taken any such decision, how come that the e-FPS portal displays names of only those who have aadhaar from the ration card?
One of the tribals from Devgadh Bariya block said, "They have been denying ration to us for the last two months on the basis of aadhaar. Many of the villagers do not have aadhaar yet. Reasons are many. Some do not have any documents to show their birth date, some due to old age, some others because their thumbs impression does not match, and there are those who do not have Rs 200 to 500 to travel to block level several times, asking middle agents to fill up their forms."
While the government claims that they have completed all Seva Setu programmes in the state, there are hundreds of poor and marginal citizens who are excluded from aadhaar registration.
“This may lead to starvation in poor families, as due to drought situation in the state this year, there is scarcity of inter-district employment in agriculture, especially in Saurashtra”, said Harinesh Pandya of Janpath, a state-level network of voluntary organizations. “No provision in a circular can have overriding effect over the provisions of an Act that has been made by Parliament”.
MAGP has demanded that the government needs to immediately issue instructions to all districts that no ration can be denied for not having aadhaar, and every family covered under Annapurna Yojana should get complete ration quota as per the allocation.
On one hand, orders of the Supreme Court say that governments must ensure that no citizen will be excluded from a scheme and a programme because of aadhaar, on the other hand, the Gujarat government has given a hard blow to the poor and marginalized in the state by making aadhaar mandatory for getting one’s ration.
---
*Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel, Ahmedabad

Comments

TRENDING

Noam Chomsky, top scholars ask NRIs to take stand on human rights violations in India

Counterview Desk
Renowned world scholars, including Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Angela Davis, Fredric Jameson, Bruno Latour, Ilan Pappe, Judith Butler, among others, have issued a statement castigating the Narendra Modi government for allegedly creating an environment of fear through arrests, intimidation and violence.

Actionable programme for 2019 polls amidst lynch mobs, caste violence, hate mongering

Counterview Desk
Reclaiming the Republic, a civil rights network, has released a document prepared under the chairmanship of Justice AP Shah (retired) -- and backed, among others, by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander, economist Prabhat Patnaik, Right to transparency activist Anjali Bhardwaj and social scientist Yogendra Yadav  (click HERE for full list) -- with the "aim" of putting forth policy and legislative reforms needed to “protect” and “strengthen” the Constitutional safeguards for India’s democratic polity.

Call to support IIM-Bangalore professor, censured for seeking action against Uniliver

Counterview Desk
Sections of the Indian Institute of Managements (IIMs) across India have strongly reacted to the decision to censure Dr Deepak Malghan, a faulty at IIM-Bangalore. Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, who is faculty at IIM-Tiruchirapalli, has sought wider solidarity with Dr Malghan, saying, "The administration has censured Deepak for merely suggesting a meaningful action against Hindustan Unilever for their abysmal environmental record" by “disinviting” it for campus placement.

India under Modi "promoted" crony business, protected financial fraudsters, fueled bigotry

By Sandeep* and Rahul Pandey**
Narendra Modi's ascension to power was accompanied with jubilation and expectation. His supporters were expecting an end to era of corruption and initiation of good governance which was described as Achche Din. His party's adherence to idea of nationalism was believed to make India a vibrant country and guide India to be a world leader. He gave the slogan of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' conveying that his government was for all.
Corruption The government system is infested with corruption. A minimum of 10% is siphoned off from government schemes and projects, some of which goes back to political party in power and remaining is pocketed by various administrative, executive and political functionaries. This corruption continues and has increased. Now an additional Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) person working as Official on Special Duty or some equivalent position in every government department also has a share in this booty.
The Narendra M…

Inviting Rajapaksa to India "insult" to 1,40,000 Tamils killed by Sri Lankan army

Counterview Desk
In the context of Sri Lankan opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa being invited in India, about 75 human rights activists*, claiming to be concerned about rights violations during the civil war in Sri Lanka, especially in 2009, have joined together to express their dissent through a statement.

A Godse legacy? BJP rulers have "refrained" from calling Gandhi Father of the Nation

By Dr Hari Desai*
What an agony! On one hand, the entire India is celebrating the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but on the other side, so-called Hindu Mahasabha members have been found mock-enacting the killing of the Mahatma and celebrating the murder by distributing sweets!

Post-advisory, Govt of India appears reluctant to ban e-cigarettes, "harmful" to kids

By Rajiv Shah
Is the Government of India dilly-dallying over the issue of banning e-cigarettes, which have been declared by anti-tobacco activists across the world as providing “an entryway to nicotine addiction”, especially among the kids? It would seem so, if the latest developments are any guide.

World Bank needs a new perspective on development, not just a new president

By Maju Varghese*
The resignation of the World Bank President Jim Yong Kim was an unexpected development given the fact that he had three more years to complete his tenure. Resignations at such a high level after bidding for a second term is unusual which prompts people to think what would have led to the act itself.

Not just Indian women engineers, men too face sexual harassment at workplace: US study

By Rajiv Shah
A recent research, carried out jointly by two US-based non-profit organizations, Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and Center for WorkLife Law (WLL), based at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, has found that 45% of women engineers as against 28% of men engineers complained that it was perceived as “inappropriate when women argued at work, even when it was work-related.”