Skip to main content

CJI's 'cockroaches' remark sparks outrage; activists' body demands apology

By A Representative
 
A major controversy has erupted following oral observations made by the Chief Justice of India during a court hearing on May 15, in which he reportedly likened certain activists to "cockroaches" and "parasites of society."
The remarks, made while hearing a petition from a lawyer seeking senior advocate designation, have drawn sharp criticism from Citizens for Democracy (CFD), a prominent civil rights organization. In a strongly worded letter to the CJI, the group has demanded an unconditional apology and withdrawal of what it calls "uncharitable remarks."
According to the CFD's letter, the CJI observed from the bench on May 15: "There are already parasites of society who attack the system, and you want to join hands with them?... There are youngsters like cockroaches, who don't get any employment or have any place in profession. Some of them become media, some of them become social media, RTI activists and other activists, and they start attacking everyone."
Following widespread criticism, the Chief Justice issued a clarification the next day, stating he was "pained" by what he termed media misrepresentation. He asserted that his remarks were specifically directed at those who had entered professions using "fake and bogus degrees," and not at the youth of the nation.
"I am proud of our present and future human resource," the CJI stated, adding that Indian youth "inspire" him.
'Lame Explanation'
The CFD has rejected this clarification as "lame," arguing that the original comments explicitly targeted activists presumed to have failed to secure employment. The letter questions the "judicial rationale" behind the remarks and draws a parallel with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's use of the epithet "Andolanjivi" (professional protester) for activists.
"What is more striking is, your comment is very close to the Prime Minister Narendra Modi calling the activists Andolanjivi," the letter states, listing other epithets allegedly used by the PM including "urban Naxals" and "Lutyens' Delhi gang."
The CFD's letter invokes the Supreme Court's own past judgments to underscore its objection. It recalls an August 20, 2024, ruling in the case 'In Re: Right to Privacy of Adolescents,' where a bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan set aside a Calcutta High Court judgment and observed: "A judgment of the Court cannot contain the Judge's personal opinions on various subjects... The Judge has to decide a case and not preach."
The letter also references a September 2024 suo motu proceeding involving controversial comments by a Karnataka High Court judge, where a five-judge bench observed that courts must "be careful not to make comments... which may be construed as being misogynistic or prejudicial to any segment of our society."
'Cockroaches Will Survive'
In a striking rhetorical flourish, the letter declares that activists—whom the CJI allegedly likened to cockroaches—have existed since the Jurassic age, surviving the extinction of dinosaurs. "Individual cockroaches can be trampled upon under dictatorial boots but our species will survive," it states.
The CFD distinguishes between "cockroaches" (activists) and "termites"—the latter described as those who "eat up government files," exploit forests, and displace Adivasi communities for corporate interests.
The letter concludes by warning that the CJI's "prejudicial and unsolicited comment" has clouded citizens' faith in the judiciary. It reminds the Chief Justice that the Constitution mandates safeguarding the interests of the disadvantaged.
"We are doing our duty to safeguard the interests of have-nots and we will continue to do so. It is for you to decide whether you will stand by the Constitution and support cockroaches, or protect the interests of termites."

Comments

  1. Regardless of the intent behind the remarks, public confidence in the judiciary depends on judges being careful with their language. When comments become the focus instead of the legal issues, they can easily overshadow the substance of the case.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.