India's nuclear ambitions: Questions that demand answers

By Shankar Sharma*

India has set an ambitious target of expanding its nuclear power capacity from the current 9,000 MW to 100,000 MW over the next 20 years. The recently enacted has added fresh momentum to this push. However, these developments have also raised serious and credible concerns among environmentalists and civil society groups across the country.

Several factors worry these groups — ranging from safety and to financial costs and the . These concerns deserve open, honest engagement from the authorities, not dismissal.

A pattern worth noting in the nuclear sector is that whenever one technology runs into problems, its advocates tend to pivot to the next promising alternative. Today, that alternative is , or . But a closer look reveals that SMRs carry their own set of unresolved issues. In fact, any nuclear technology — old or new — brings with it broadly the same basket of concerns for society, even if the scale or nature of those concerns may vary.

According to a , achieving the 100 GW nuclear target by 2047 will require an investment of Rs 25 lakh crore and sweeping policy reforms. This is an enormous commitment of both financial and natural resources. It is therefore essential that all societal concerns are addressed satisfactorily before our communities are locked into this path.

At the same time, we should not overlook the inspiring example right within our own country. has emerged as a shining star in India's renewable energy story. The state did not merely participate in the — it helped write the rulebook. This demonstrates that clean, sustainable electricity is not a distant dream but an achievable reality, and one that avoids the complex risks associated with nuclear power.

A serious public discussion on how India can transition to a — on both the demand and supply sides — is the need of the hour. Such a discussion must involve civil society, experts, and policymakers working together in good faith.

---

*Power & Climate Policy Analyst, Karnataka

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta* India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

Vande Mataram and the politics of distraction: When patriotism replaces performance

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan There is an old saying: “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” Samuel Johnson was not criticising love for one’s country; he was warning against those who weaponise patriotic symbolism to escape accountability. In India today, that warning feels uncomfortably relevant.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha* In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine.

Counterview

Search This Blog