'Funding bias': ₹2,532 cr for Sanskrit vs ₹34 cr for four Dravidian languages

By A Representative

The All India Secondary Education Council (AISEC) has sharply criticized the Union Government’s recent directive mandating a strict three-language formula in schools, calling it a veiled attempt to impose Hindi and Sanskrit on non-Hindi speaking populations.

In a statement, AISEC General Secretary Dr. Tarun Kanti Naskar demanded the immediate withdrawal of the CBSE Circular dated May 15, 2026, which makes the study of three languages compulsory for Class IX effective July 1, 2026.

Under the new rules, at least two of the three languages must be native Indian languages. A foreign language can only be studied as a third language if the first two are Indian, or as an optional fourth language.

Dr. Naskar backed his opposition with a sharp critique of the government’s own spending patterns. Citing a 10-year cumulative expenditure analysis (2014-15 to 2024-25), he highlighted stark disparities in funding for scheduled and classical languages:

- Sanskrit: ₹2,532.59 crore

- Urdu: ₹837.94 crore

- Hindi: ₹426.99 crore

- Tamil: ₹113.48 crore

- Kannada, Telugu, Malayalam & Odia (combined): ₹34.08 crore

“It is palpably clear that much emphasis is given to Sanskrit, which is not a spoken language of common people in any part of the country, followed by Urdu and Hindi,” Dr. Naskar said. He argued that the policy effectively forces either Sanskrit or Hindi—or both—onto non-Hindi speaking communities, while similarly condemning Hindi speakers to imposed Sanskrit or other regional languages.

The statement also took aim at the circular’s silence on English, which Dr. Naskar described as “an essential bridge for higher education and a window to acquire worldwide knowledge.” He stressed that English is equally imperative for the robust development of all Modern Indian Languages, enabling symbiotic enrichment rather than displacement.

AISEC has proposed a two-language framework instead: every student should learn their mother tongue and English. Children of inter-state migrants may choose to learn the language of their new state alongside English. A third language, the organization said, should remain strictly voluntary.

“Pedagogically, this two-language framework is the most practical, scientifically sound, and inclusive approach,” Dr. Naskar asserted, demanding that the Union Government immediately revoke the three-language formula by withdrawing the CBSE circular.

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan * Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.

Counterview

Search This Blog