Skip to main content

Adrift and unanchored ambitions: The meandering foreign policy of Hindutva politics under Modi

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
Post-colonial Indian foreign policy, shaped by the internationalist ideals of the anti-colonial struggle, stood firmly against colonialism, militarism, apartheid, neo-colonial economic practices, and imperialist hegemony. The concept of Non-Alignment was first articulated at the United Nations by India and Yugoslavia during the Korean War, signaling a refusal to be drawn into the bipolar politics of the Cold War. This idea soon evolved into the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), a global forum in which India played a leading role—championing decolonization, peaceful development, democratisation, and global solidarity.
NAM was never a passive stance of neutrality. Rather, it represented a proactive opposition to colonial and capitalist domination, apartheid, and military alliances. Representing over 55% of the world’s population, the movement promoted a democratic, peaceful world order based on justice and non-alignment. These foundational principles deeply informed Indian foreign policy, combining moral leadership with strategic national interest.
Even after the Cold War, the values of peace, cooperation, and conflict resolution remained cornerstones of Indian diplomacy. NAM continued to advocate for multilateralism and equality, with India emerging as a key voice in defending the interests of the Global South.
However, the rise of Hindutva politics under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has marked a sharp departure from this legacy. Aligning closely with U.S.-led imperialist agendas and embracing a narrow, majoritarian worldview, the current government has eroded India’s strategic autonomy. Modi’s close alliance with the Israeli state and India’s involvement in the U.S.-led Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD)—often seen as an “Asian NATO” to contain China—reflect a shift that has compromised India’s independent foreign policy.
Framed as a "multi-alignment" strategy, these alignments have weakened the foundational principles of India’s foreign policy and diluted the relevance of the Non-Aligned Movement. What once stood for anti-colonial solidarity, peaceful coexistence, and global justice has been replaced by transactional diplomacy driven by short-term geopolitical interests. The foreign policy of Hindutva-led governance appears increasingly opportunistic and morally unmoored, jeopardizing India’s credibility and influence on the global stage.
While no Indian Prime Minister has undertaken as many international trips as Modi, foreign visits alone do not define the effectiveness or values of a country’s diplomacy. Modi’s travels have often prioritized personal branding and spectacle over substantive diplomacy. Far from advancing India’s core interests, they have fostered a personality cult and weakened the country's traditional diplomatic stature—one that was built on principled leadership and global solidarity.
The current trajectory of Indian foreign policy under Hindutva reflects a directionless and incoherent approach, characterized by erratic choices and ideological rigidity. By aligning with imperialist and Zionist regimes, the Modi government has distanced India from its historic role as a leader of the Global South and a champion of oppressed peoples. Nations that once looked to India as a moral and strategic ally now view it with increasing skepticism.
This decline demands a robust response from Indian citizens. The international reputation and foundational interests of the country must not be bartered away to serve American imperialism or neo-colonial European trade interests. Too often, India is seen by Western powers as merely a market—its people reduced to consumers—rather than as equal partners in shaping a fair and just global order.
As Henry Kissinger once remarked, “It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.” In this context, the principles of the Non-Aligned Movement remain as relevant as ever. Reviving them is essential to reasserting the independence of Indian foreign policy and promoting a democratic, equitable world order—one not dictated by the imperatives of global capitalism or corporate interests.
India must reclaim its moral compass. An independent, non-aligned foreign policy—rooted in peace, justice, and solidarity—is key to restoring its global standing. The ideal of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (The world is one family), long central to India’s philosophical and civilisational vision, must be revived not merely as rhetoric, but as a guiding principle.
Let the following verse from the Maha Upanishad once again illuminate India’s global outlook:
 "The world is a family
One is a relative, the other is a stranger—say the small-minded.
The entire world is a family—live the magnanimous.
Be detached, be magnanimous,
Lift up your mind and enjoy
The fruit of universal freedom."
In the broader context, our freedoms, peace, prosperity, and security are inherently interconnected. When these values are divided by national interest, religion, race, or ideology, they are ultimately diminished for all. Foreign policy must rise above divisive politics and reflect a commitment to human dignity, justice, and liberation from all forms of inequality, exploitation, and reactionary thought. That is the only truly global and humane path forward.

Comments

TRENDING

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative   A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram   In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

The Epstein shock, global power games and India’s foreign policy dilemma

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The “Epstein” tsunami has jolted establishments everywhere. Politicians, bureaucrats, billionaires, celebrities, intellectuals, academics, religious gurus, and preachers—all appear to be under scrutiny, even dismantled. At first glance, it may seem like a story cutting across left, right, centre, Democrats, Republicans, socialists, capitalists—every label one can think of. Much of it, of course, is gossip, as people seek solace in the possible inclusion of names they personally dislike. 

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram   In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.