Skip to main content

Adrift and unanchored ambitions: The meandering foreign policy of Hindutva politics under Modi

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
Post-colonial Indian foreign policy, shaped by the internationalist ideals of the anti-colonial struggle, stood firmly against colonialism, militarism, apartheid, neo-colonial economic practices, and imperialist hegemony. The concept of Non-Alignment was first articulated at the United Nations by India and Yugoslavia during the Korean War, signaling a refusal to be drawn into the bipolar politics of the Cold War. This idea soon evolved into the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), a global forum in which India played a leading role—championing decolonization, peaceful development, democratisation, and global solidarity.
NAM was never a passive stance of neutrality. Rather, it represented a proactive opposition to colonial and capitalist domination, apartheid, and military alliances. Representing over 55% of the world’s population, the movement promoted a democratic, peaceful world order based on justice and non-alignment. These foundational principles deeply informed Indian foreign policy, combining moral leadership with strategic national interest.
Even after the Cold War, the values of peace, cooperation, and conflict resolution remained cornerstones of Indian diplomacy. NAM continued to advocate for multilateralism and equality, with India emerging as a key voice in defending the interests of the Global South.
However, the rise of Hindutva politics under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has marked a sharp departure from this legacy. Aligning closely with U.S.-led imperialist agendas and embracing a narrow, majoritarian worldview, the current government has eroded India’s strategic autonomy. Modi’s close alliance with the Israeli state and India’s involvement in the U.S.-led Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD)—often seen as an “Asian NATO” to contain China—reflect a shift that has compromised India’s independent foreign policy.
Framed as a "multi-alignment" strategy, these alignments have weakened the foundational principles of India’s foreign policy and diluted the relevance of the Non-Aligned Movement. What once stood for anti-colonial solidarity, peaceful coexistence, and global justice has been replaced by transactional diplomacy driven by short-term geopolitical interests. The foreign policy of Hindutva-led governance appears increasingly opportunistic and morally unmoored, jeopardizing India’s credibility and influence on the global stage.
While no Indian Prime Minister has undertaken as many international trips as Modi, foreign visits alone do not define the effectiveness or values of a country’s diplomacy. Modi’s travels have often prioritized personal branding and spectacle over substantive diplomacy. Far from advancing India’s core interests, they have fostered a personality cult and weakened the country's traditional diplomatic stature—one that was built on principled leadership and global solidarity.
The current trajectory of Indian foreign policy under Hindutva reflects a directionless and incoherent approach, characterized by erratic choices and ideological rigidity. By aligning with imperialist and Zionist regimes, the Modi government has distanced India from its historic role as a leader of the Global South and a champion of oppressed peoples. Nations that once looked to India as a moral and strategic ally now view it with increasing skepticism.
This decline demands a robust response from Indian citizens. The international reputation and foundational interests of the country must not be bartered away to serve American imperialism or neo-colonial European trade interests. Too often, India is seen by Western powers as merely a market—its people reduced to consumers—rather than as equal partners in shaping a fair and just global order.
As Henry Kissinger once remarked, “It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.” In this context, the principles of the Non-Aligned Movement remain as relevant as ever. Reviving them is essential to reasserting the independence of Indian foreign policy and promoting a democratic, equitable world order—one not dictated by the imperatives of global capitalism or corporate interests.
India must reclaim its moral compass. An independent, non-aligned foreign policy—rooted in peace, justice, and solidarity—is key to restoring its global standing. The ideal of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (The world is one family), long central to India’s philosophical and civilisational vision, must be revived not merely as rhetoric, but as a guiding principle.
Let the following verse from the Maha Upanishad once again illuminate India’s global outlook:
 "The world is a family
One is a relative, the other is a stranger—say the small-minded.
The entire world is a family—live the magnanimous.
Be detached, be magnanimous,
Lift up your mind and enjoy
The fruit of universal freedom."
In the broader context, our freedoms, peace, prosperity, and security are inherently interconnected. When these values are divided by national interest, religion, race, or ideology, they are ultimately diminished for all. Foreign policy must rise above divisive politics and reflect a commitment to human dignity, justice, and liberation from all forms of inequality, exploitation, and reactionary thought. That is the only truly global and humane path forward.

Comments

TRENDING

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".