Skip to main content

Naseeruddin Shah stands out for his uncompromising stance on artistic and political issues

By Harsh Thakor* 
Naseeruddin Shah has epitomised versatility, inventiveness and experimentation in a way that no other Bollywood actor of his era has. As we celebrate his 75th birthday on July 20, it is worth reflecting on the contributions of a man who transformed the very grammar of acting in Hindi cinema.
Lacking the conventional good looks of a mainstream hero, Shah nevertheless radiated a magnetic energy on screen, often overshadowing the most dominant of superstars. Few actors in Bollywood's history have paid as much justice to the characters they portrayed. His ability to mould himself into the skin of any role set new standards for performance. With remarkable introspection and emotional depth, Shah brought to cinema a spirit of constant reinvention. His acting journey has been marked by a series of pathbreaking experiments, which expanded the artistic boundaries of Hindi films.
Arguably the finest actor of the modern era—and among the all-time greats—Shah gave Indian Parallel Cinema a much-needed boost, championing progressive ideals and resistance against societal oppression. Whether depicting the anguish of the marginalised or the moral dilemmas of the urban elite, he showcased a wide range of expressions and mannerisms. His characters often exuded a profound inner struggle, balancing vulnerability with rage in a manner that resembled the brushwork of a painter or the chiselling of a sculptor.
Shah breathed life into the most complex characters and stood out for his ability to portray moral conviction—his silences spoke volumes, often interrupted by sudden bursts of passion. His film career has been marked by extraordinary diversity, with each role presenting him in a new light.
Off screen, Naseeruddin Shah has remained an uncompromising critic of the Hindutva wave and the stifling of dissent in India. He has shown solidarity with people’s movements and condemned the corporate takeover of Bollywood. His critique of the eulogising of Sholay, and comments on actors like Rajesh Khanna, although controversial, reflect his uncompromising stance on artistic and political issues.
Noteworthy Performances
In Nishant (1975), Shah made an unforgettable debut, portraying the diffident younger brother of a feudal overlord. His role grounded the film’s theme of caste oppression and sexual violence, giving it a soul.
In Junoon (1979), he matched Shashi Kapoor’s performance with his explosive portrayal of Sarfaraz Khan, a rebel resisting British rule, delivering the iconic line “Hum Dilli haar gaye hain” with unforgettable fervour.
In Aakrosh (1980), Shah played a young upper-caste lawyer navigating a broken justice system. His performance revealed the systemic silencing of marginalised voices, embodying helplessness and tenacity with remarkable subtlety.
In Sparsh (1980), he portrayed Anirudh, a proud blind school principal, with grace and conviction. His interactions with Kavita, particularly his rejection of pity, remain deeply moving and earned him a National Award.
In Albert Pinto Ko Gussa Kyoon Aata Hai (1980), his raw performance captured the emotional turbulence of the working class, reflecting Saeed Mirza’s vision of social unrest.
In Masoom (1983), as a man grappling with guilt over his illegitimate son, he brought heartfelt vulnerability and empathy to Shekhar Kapur’s poignant tale.
In Mandi (1983), set in a brothel, he effortlessly blended naivete and rebellion, making his character a vital thread in Shyam Benegal’s tapestry of lives.
In Paar (1984), Shah played Naurangia, a poor villager fleeing caste violence. His portrayal of pain, endurance, and resistance culminated in the iconic pig-herding river crossing scene. The role earned him his second National Award.
In Mirza Ghalib (1988), he embodied the legendary Urdu poet with poetic sensitivity, giving Gulzar’s lyrical vision a living form.
In Ijaazat (1987), amid strong performances by Rekha and Anuradha Patel, Shah’s portrayal of a conflicted, vulnerable man added weight to the emotional complexity of the love triangle.
In Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron (1983), he brought realism and restraint to Kundan Shah’s comic chaos, balancing mystery and satire with exquisite timing.
In Pestonjee (1988), he played Phiroj Shah, a heartbroken Parsi man, expressing melancholy through subdued expressions and perfecting the community’s mannerisms.
In Iqbal (2005), as a reluctant, drunken cricket coach, he crafted one of his most endearing roles. His transformation into a supportive mentor was depicted with humour, artistry and subtle emotion.
In Wednesday (2008), he played a common man who shakes the system with his threats. His character, driven by frustration at state apathy, became a symbol of everyday resistance.
In Ishqiya (2010), Shah portrayed Khalu, a lovelorn old-school criminal. His poetic musings, nuanced expressions, and understated humour stood out even amid strong performances by Vidya Balan and Arshad Warsi.
Naseeruddin Shah’s legacy is one of daring choices, emotional honesty and relentless experimentation. Few actors have redefined the cinematic space in India with such depth, range and conviction.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

The ultimate all-time ODI XI: A personal selection of icons across eras

By Harsh Thakor* This is my all-time best XI chosen for ODI (One Day International) cricket:  1. Adam Gilchrist (W) – The absolute master blaster who could create the impact of exploding gunpowder with his electrifying strokeplay. No batsman was more intimidating in his era. Often his knocks decided the fate of games as though the result were premeditated. He escalated batting strike rates to surreal realms.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.